Back at you brother...
Margaret and I wish the best to you and yours Monte and all the Live Coders!
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of
Monte G
Hi LiveCoders
I’m off for the next couple of weeks (back on the 9th). Roughly half the team
return on the 4th and most of the rest on the 9th.
If you are taking a break I hope it’s a good one. I’m planning lots of work in
the garden which has been thoroughly neglected over the past few months.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Mike Kerner wrote:
> The new dictionary is indeed different. It is (mostly) implemented using
> the Bootstrap framework, which also means that much of it is more
> webby than the rest of us might like
Some of what we like and don't like can be simply down to our
I just had an interesting Android quit issues. I have to check if this is an
Android problem only or a characteristic of the base engine. I wonder if
this is related to stopping the debugger in the IDE and have some calling
handler do something?
Command test1
Repeat while not test2()
Answer "no
Point taken. However, being an IT person and having to work with customers to
resolve their issues, I find that regularly, the user will miss some critical
piece of information that would take me right to the problem. Not only that, I
have found that more times than I would like to admit, the cu
To be fair, a test stack isn't always required. They're actually pretty
flexible about that. What I meant in my post was that if the test does,
in fact, need a stack in order to adequately report it, I tend to
procrastinate because I'm almost always in the middle of something else.
If there's a
IMO, having a *requirement* for a user to create a test stack - EVEN IF
THE SIMPLE DESCRIPTION IS CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS - is an unacceptable
bureaucratic nonsense.
I'm all in favour of creating test stacks to demonstrate a problem -
esp. if the originally failing stack is complex, or if this c
On 12/22/16 11:46 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I would like to think that the introduction of the new external would
not require us to rewrite our apps.
Have you filed a bug report on that?
No, for a couple of reasons. First, it doesn't seem much different than
the need to close all running proc
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> I did write about it but I hadn't tried it yet. You were right on
> the nose, that fixes it. I had to allow a short wait. This fails
> as before:
>
>tsNetClose
>quit
>
> But this works:
>
>tsNetClose
>wait 1 with messages
>quit
>
> Success! :)
I would
I assume this discussion is still intact.
The "rawkeyDown" message may be trapped as follows:
on rawkeydown tkey
if tkey = 65308 then doScrollDownStuff
else doScrollUpStuff
end rawkeydown
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Detect-scroll-act
I am very interested. Please contact me via email off-list.
Thanks!
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Tiemo Hollmann TB
Sent: Thursday, Decem
Could you describe what exactly the software currently does? I have very
little spare time, but it sounds like I good cause. If I could help in
some small way, I would. Just need to know the level of skill needed, and
the full scope of the project.
~Roger
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Tiem
Actually, nevermind, the scroll wheel on my system doesn't trigger an arrow
key press, but the arrowkeys are indeed picked up by keysdown. My
apologies. :)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> I think the scroll wheel sends arrow keys, but since there isn't a
> "rawkeysdown()" f
I think the scroll wheel sends arrow keys, but since there isn't a
"rawkeysdown()" function to match the keysdown() function it would require
either an external or the function to be added with livecode builder. At
which point I wonder.. Is there a way to hook in to the system timer? (the
one that
The new dictionary is indeed different. It is (mostly) implemented using
the Bootstrap framework, which also means that much of it is more
webby than the rest of us might like (try to expand the window and see what
happens). Other than the tab control, the rest is one big browser widget,
so the b
Hi.
The "rawKeyDown" message can detect scrollWheel activity. The results are:
65308 for a down scroll
65309 for an up scroll.
Craig Newman
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Detect-scroll-activity-when-LC-is-not-frontmost-tp4711142p4711144.html
S
Hi all,
I don't know, if you all have your own company and products or if there are
also contract workers amongst you.
I have an old windows software (written in Toolbook), which I would love to
rewrite in LC for Win/Mac/iOS/Android. The issue is, I am only a part time
developer amongst lots of o
17 matches
Mail list logo
