Android Stack Opener

Hi All, Check these files that I am using to develop and test faster, much faster, any stack using a real Android devices (rooted), without the limitations of device emulation. 1) Stack Opener v3 (Android APK) Download from:

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Mark Wieder wrote: > On 05/01/2017 04:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > >> How many Android devices have an x86 processor? >> >> My hunch is that there are more C++ apps on Android than there are x86 >> devices they can't run on, but I have no data on that. >> > > I believe all the

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

On 05/01/2017 04:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: How many Android devices have an x86 processor? My hunch is that there are more C++ apps on Android than there are x86 devices they can't run on, but I have no data on that. I believe all the Chromebooks have Intel chips. This

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Jan Schenkel wrote: > So LiveCode is a bit of an outsider, as the apps it produces spend > little time in the Dalvik/ART virtual machine. All scripts run in the > native portion, and events are funneled from the VM into native code > to be handled there. This leaves me wondering which

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

On Sat, 4/29/17, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > > [snip] > > I had thought one of the reasons Android uses the Dalvik and ART > VMs is because they're VMs, separating the APIs from processor architectures. > > If so, then the LC engine for Android is

Re: Android & LC advice

David V Glasgow wrote: >> On 30 Apr 2017, at 2:49 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> >> David V Glasgow wrote: >> > Because of the cost issue, I am assuming that Android will be the >> > most appropriate platform. >> >> If cost were the only issue, Android would no doubt be the better >> choice by

Re: [OT] Today's Google Doodle/Theme

Phallic programming: Ada Lovelace ain't in it! On 5/1/17 6:18 pm, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: The maypole?? Bob S On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:06 , Scott Rossi via use-livecode wrote: Note today’s Google doodle topic is especially appropriate for the LC

Re: sims' spotty dog

A great deal has been done about it by most people on this list. I am not getting them because I use Microsoft OLP (Online Protection). Other spam filter software is available. > On Apr 29, 2017, at 10:28 , Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode > wrote: > > Why

Re: [OT] Today's Google Doodle/Theme

The maypole?? Bob S > On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:06 , Scott Rossi via use-livecode > wrote: > > Note today’s Google doodle topic is especially appropriate for the LC > community. > > Regards, > > Scott Rossi > Creative Director > Tactile Media, UX/UI Design

Re: [OT] Today's Google Doodle/Theme

:-)) > On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:20 , Scott Rossi via use-livecode > wrote: > > Then don’t look in the Balkans. > > Scott Rossi > Creative Director > Tactile Media, UX/UI Design > > > >> On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:18 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode >>

Re: Creating apps directly on mobile devices

One of the LC guys was messing around with this a couple years ago, and posted about it on the blog. I have been able to do lots of useful things, including editing scripts, on mobile. I would be willing to bet that you can have all sorts of fun if you set your mind to it on a 13" tablet... On

Re: Is there any reason not to create a self-installing app?

Have a look at Trevor's Levure framework. It's an easy to make #1 happen. Also, it's really easy to just make hack-a-stacks with it, too. I was pretty skeptical when I started using it a couple months ago, but once I started using it, I stopped building anything the old way. On Sun, Apr 30,

LiveCode.org

Referencing: Community Coding Standards, Naming Conventions, Best Practice Richard Gaskin wrote:"These are good questions"... put "Thank you, Richard" into myArrayKey ["private"] put "It seems Richard is spending all his days and nights here in the mailing lists and forums. There must be

[ANN] This Week in LiveCode 80

Hi all, Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter! Read issue #80 here: https://goo.gl/v80as0 This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what's been going on in and around

Re: Android & LC advice

Good point Richard, I should have said. Nothing I would expect to be particularly demanding. Mostly shunting text about on screen, timing and recording responses, and very modest data exchange < = 1000 characters. > On 30 Apr 2017, at 2:49 pm, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode >

Re: Documentation on Accelerated Rendering

Layering was definitely broken, that's for sure. But in this case we're referring to the layermode of a draggable object. I haven't worked much with his latest version yet, when I was doing it I was using fields instead of images. But since the images are created on the fly from within LC I

Re: Documentation on Accelerated Rendering

My mistake was resetting the layermode after a drop. It does have to be set after object creation but that should be the only time it's messed with. Dragging was too jerky without acceleratedRendering, so I think that has to remain. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay |

Re: Documentation on Accelerated Rendering

Did you already try the following? Layer mode: Use 8.1.4. Before that and in 9-dp6 exact layering is broken. The combination: set the acceleratedRendering to false set the paintcompression to RLE set the alwaysbuffer of to true ___ use-livecode