Livecode Future - Tracking No-Hassle Solution

2024-07-27 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
I agreed with Simon on Tracking vs Privacy/Security: > If I had ever tried to supply any application that "phoned home" > I would have been asked to leave and never darken their door again. And old-fashioned busywork/paperwork Hassle to request opt outs - > additional levels of complexity, fr

Re: Livecode Future - End User Cost Extravaganza

2024-07-27 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
Mike: > $440/device is not happening. even $100/device is not happening. > we are not paying $100/employee so they can run our payroll app, > for instance, on their phone. Well said! You summed it up perfectly. Thanks. What LC tier would work for you? My experience ... Consulting clients, bi

Filtering unicode text

2024-07-27 Thread Neville Smythe via use-livecode
David Glasgow wrote > I have an app I haven?t touched for a while that makes heavy use of filter of > string variables up to 1,000,000 lines (but often only hundreds to tens of > thousands of lines). In my case finding all lines containing the to be found > string is a benefit > > I have lon

Re: Livecode Future

2024-07-27 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Mike Kerner wrote: > i appreciate the feedback. we've looked at xojo, a number of times, > but never written anything important in it. it was just an option > that came to mind, immediately, when thinking about LC competitors, > and their pricing. I've been very immersed in vendor evaluation in re

Re: Livecode Future

2024-07-27 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
i appreciate the feedback. we've looked at xojo, a number of times, but never written anything important in it. it was just an option that came to mind, immediately, when thinking about LC competitors, and their pricing. if we we decide to pull the plug on LC and rewrite our mobile apps, xojo would

Re: Livecode Future

2024-07-27 Thread Phil Smith via use-livecode
Xojo is not true multithreaded. The threads are cooperative, not preemptive. It uses "workers" which are basically helper apps to sort of do multithreads. They are working on preemptive threads but no idea when that will happen. The IDE is written in Xojo so its use of threads is limited.

Re: Livecode Future

2024-07-27 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
sean, * in reverse order: compare to xojo. $799. unlimited deployment (mac/win/linux/web/mobile, console/service apps. instead of bragging about their consulting service, they send you consulting leads). if you want to unlock god mode, with things like "top priority support", "fast fixes", "rapid

Re: use-livecode Digest, Vol 250, Issue 1

2024-07-27 Thread David V Glasgow via use-livecode
> On 3 Jul 2024, at 2:05 am, Neville Smythe via use-livecode > wrote: > > There is however > > filter elements of with into tLines; put line 1 of the keys of > tLines into tFoundLine > > And that is still very fast on unicode, even though it will find all the > lines matching str, not just

Re: Individual licensing questions

2024-07-27 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
That’s a superb idea. It’s very much like the one for Unreal Engine 5 I use. Theres is something more like $100,000 though. At that tip over point, it is quite a hike in costs though if you’ve been used to paying nothing and suddenly have to start paying $5000. But, hopefully by then you will ha

Re: Livecode Future

2024-07-27 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Mike Just picking up on your email below from earlier. You would be eligible for the 5% if you had it available in a privately accessible part of a web site to download as a standalone. That is, I’m pretty sure, the correct understanding of this licensing. And if you are getting $0 Gross from i

Re: Community edition

2024-07-27 Thread Tim Selander via use-livecode
It works on the older M1 macs, as long as you don't upgrade to OS14 -- I'm keeping my M1 Macbook air for as long as I can! Tim Selander On 2024/07/27 8:48, Neville Smythe via use-livecode wrote: On 26 Jul 2024, at 8:01 pm, Heriberto wrote: I am currently using the "Community" version, b