i thought most of the human interface and multimedia patient nonsense was done
by the late 90s. soo many of these trolls with the cdrom boom we went thru and
it was pretty funny then as the ideas had been out there on public display most
of the time way before. At one point our company was appro
Dar Scott wrote:
> I would love to see inventors prosper.
Q: In the current litigious business environment we find ourselves in,
how many people does it take to write a line of code?
A: Three.
One programmer to write the code.
One attorney to check each line of code against existing patents.
I would love to see inventors prosper. I recognize the debates in the moral
standing of IP. I know many ideas have come up and were not developed. I know
how easy it is to see a good idea, maybe an invention, and think it is obvious
in one's trade, and it might be. We have different ideas on
I can't track it down right now, but while I was at Apple (1987-1992) someone
did a "throwing Finder", where you could grab files and throw them to the trash.
Someone tried to sue everyone who had made a CD-ROM once, I think that failed.
Hopefully this one will fail too.
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:
Bruce wrote:
> The patent is RE43,318 which is a reissue of 6,920,619. The first few claims
> will give you an idea of what is covered:
>
> 1. A system for manipulating images comprising a screen upon which an image
> is displayed; and a computer coupled to the screen, the computer causing the
The patent is RE43,318 which is a reissue of 6,920,619. The first few claims
will give you an idea of what is covered:
1. A system for manipulating images comprising a screen upon which an image is
displayed; and a computer coupled to the screen, the computer causing the
images to be manipulat
Kee wrote:
> Wondering what the lawyer patented and how it was different from state of the
> art 1993.
I believe the patent was awarded for the utility and novelty of gestures.
Actually touching an object on the screen and flinging it away to delete it.
Touch screen interaction then was usually
In the article:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/apple-betrayed-by-its-own-law-firm/
I am not sure what the lawyer patented exactly but if is was moving an object
on the screen by pointing to it, there were touch screens way back when and the
sample code from the 1993 HyperTalk
Great publicity
Mind-boogling that these software patents get approved.
Wasn't this part of Hypercard?
on mouseDown
grab me
end mouseDown
Brahmanathaswami
Björnke von Gierke wrote:
Of large importance to this list is the third last paragraph, (last link on the
first page of two):
"
..
On 06/02/2013 08:12 PM, Jim Lambert wrote:
Also, Here's an article the lawyer's wife wrote for RunRev's Newsletter in
2005, two years pre-iPhone.
http://newsletters.livecode.com/march/issue22/newsletter2.php
Jim Lambert
___
Interestingly enough the
On 06/02/2013 08:09 PM, Jim Lambert wrote:
Dr. Milekic participated in the use-revolution list in 2006 & 2004. His
questions seeme very much related to this invention.
Jim Lambert
___
Bulgarians would make fairly pointed noises that Dr Milekic is a
Also, Here's an article the lawyer's wife wrote for RunRev's Newsletter in
2005, two years pre-iPhone.
http://newsletters.livecode.com/march/issue22/newsletter2.php
Jim Lambert
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit thi
Dr. Milekic participated in the use-revolution list in 2006 & 2004. His
questions seeme very much related to this invention.
Jim Lambert
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and man
Of large importance to this list is the third last paragraph, (last link on the
first page of two):
"
...
Milekic had never written a line of code or taken a programming class; he told
a Philly tech publication that his touchscreen software was built with a
program called RunTime Revolution, wh
Definition of a 'good' start ?
... ten dead lawyers
> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:26:17 -0700
> Subject: Another bizarre Apple patent troll case, in which Runtime Revolution
> plays a bit part
> From: bornst...@designeq.com
> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>
> htt
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/apple-betrayed-by-its-own-law-firm/
--
Regards,
Howard Bornstein
---
www.designeq.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubsc
16 matches
Mail list logo
