HI All
Hoping I'm not teaching my granny to suck eggs ... Here is a great article
I remembered reading from a few years ago. It's easy to find on google so
you probably know of it ...
http://www.tannerhelland.com/4660/dithering-eleven-algorithms-source-code/
In any case his projects and how he
After reading Mark Waddingham explanation, now i am using a sequential
ordered array for this handler. Check this much shorter and faster version:
on mouseUp
put the millisecs into startTime
set the cursor to busy
put the alphadata of img "Image" into tAlphaData
put the imagedata of
@Al.
For multiples of 1/8 (Atkinson) you need 8*256=2048 integers,
that is 11 Bit.
For multiples of 1/16 (Floyd-Steinberg) you need 16*256=4096
integers, that is 12 Bit.
In 2 chars = 16 Bit fit even multiples of 1/256.
No dither-algorithm uses such tiny diffusion-errors.
__
Hi Hermann,
Hermann Hoch wrote:
> So all considerations to improve the LCS script are,
> TMHO, of rather theoretical value. Here are some more:
> The Atkinson algorithm uses multiples of 1/8 = 0.125 for
> the diffusion-error, the Floyd-Steinberg algorithm uses
> multiples of 1/16 = 0.0625.
> And h
> Al wrote:
> Please, check this new handler in the forum and suggest how to
> make this faster and more precise.
I already gave you a method that is, with a 500x500 image, at
least 1000 (thousand) times faster than your script.
Of course this is not due my special skills but the ability of
javas
On 2017-10-12 19:35, Alejandro Tejada via use-livecode wrote:
Peter Read wrote:
One note of caution regarding the use of the "repeat for each" loop,
whilst you will get a loop iteration for every value in the collection
(fldhexa3 in your example), you are not guaranteed the order in
which they w
A few hours ago, I send a message to the mail list, a message that vanish
without trace. Now I am resending parts of that message. The rest of the
message is in the forum...
Peter Read wrote:
> One note of caution regarding the use of the "repeat for each" loop,
> whilst you will get a loop iterat
Peter Reid wrote:
> One note of caution regarding the use of the "repeat for each" loop,
> whilst you will get a loop iteration for every value in the collection
> (fldhexa3 in your example), you are not guaranteed the order in which
> they will occur.
Maybe I misunderstand, but are you thinking
That is correct Ben. It's not the repeat for each that is unreliable (probably
a bad word to use here) but it is arrays which do not retain the sequence of
key/values in the order they were put in.
To get around this, when possible use numbered keys, then:
put the keys of aMyArray into tKeyLi
Hi Peter,
One note of caution regarding the use of the "repeat for each" loop,
whilst you will get a loop iteration for every value in the collection
(fldhexa3 in your example), you are not guaranteed the order in which they
will occur.
Are you sure? My understanding has always been that chun
One note of caution regarding the use of the "repeat for each" loop, whilst you
will get a loop iteration for every value in the collection (fldhexa3 in your
example), you are not guaranteed the order in which they will occur. This
doesn't matter in a lot of cases but does matter when the seque
11 matches
Mail list logo
