App Browser versus Project Browser

Well, it seems that the "people" are speaking with one voice over here: http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25503 So, as an experiment in participatory democracy, and whether RunRev/LiveCode REALLY listen to their installed customer base, Please go there and give your opinion. R.

Browser

I am again looking at implementing Javascript charts within a LC browser. Looking at amCharts. Got a chart displaying easily within the browser widget. Tries to print the card but the widget does not print. So, I am left wondering if printing is impossible from within LC but then remembered

Browser

gt;> I am again looking at implementing Javascript charts within a LC browser. >> Looking at amCharts. >> Got a chart displaying easily within the browser widget. >> Tries to print the card but the widget does not print. > > > I’m using amCharts in another project

Browser!!!!

see subject I've just posted this to the KS forum: OK, with the @RunRev team hopefully having a good night's rest and with us very close to our final stretch goal I'm going to take the bull by the horns and let you know what I think the next goal will be based on some information I was provide

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

r base, Please go there and give your opinion. If by the 'people' you mean yourself, one other person and another who said he doesn't even use the application browser (and hasn't for years) ;) To be fair, whilst preference *might* be an interesting thing to gauge... Far

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

iveCode REALLY listen to their installed customer base, Please go there and give your opinion. If by the 'people' you mean yourself, one other person and another who said he doesn't even use the application browser (and hasn't for years) ;) And Jacque Landman Gay. To be fai

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

iveCode REALLY listen to their installed customer base, Please go there and give your opinion. If by the 'people' you mean yourself, one other person and another who said he doesn't even use the application browser (and hasn't for years) ;) Well, I may not know much, but I do

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Indeed - but I don't think your tone of phrase was using it in that exact manner? ;) By the way, I'm smiling here - it is a useful conversation to have if it is constructive. Either app browser bashing or project browser bashing isn't particularly useful to my mind. What is us

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Seriously, no need to feel hot about the collar :) There are definitely people who do not like the project browser - that is clear. I'd also suggest that there are people who don't like the application browser. So - let us assume that it costs a good deal of time to maintain bot

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 07/10/15 21:40, Mark Waddingham wrote: Indeed - but I don't think your tone of phrase was using it in that exact manner? ;) By the way, I'm smiling here - it is a useful conversation to have if it is constructive. Either app browser bashing or project browser bashing isn'

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

So if we had deleted the app browser stack from the build, would your point of view have changed and would you have started to use the project browser? ;) Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Oct 2015, at 19:46, Richmond wrote: > >> On 07/10/15 21:40, Mark Waddingham wrote: >> In

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

who do not like the project browser - that is clear. I'd also suggest that there are people who don't like the application browser. So - let us assume that it costs a good deal of time to maintain both and thus having one such thing would be preferable... Is there a compromise in de

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 07/10/15 21:43, Mark Waddingham wrote: Seriously, no need to feel hot about the collar :) There are definitely people who do not like the project browser - that is clear. I'd also suggest that there are people who don't like the application browser. So - let us assume that it co

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

to feel hot about the collar :) There are definitely people who do not like the project browser - that is clear. I'd also suggest that there are people who don't like the application browser. So - let us assume that it costs a good deal of time to maintain both and thus havin

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

So if we had deleted the app browser stack from the build, would your point of view have changed and would you have started to use the project browser? ;) Sent from my iPhone On 7 Oct 2015, at 19:46, Richmond wrote: On 07/10/15 21:40, Mark Waddingham wrote: Indeed - but I don't think yo

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

As an indication of community division it might be useful - app browser/project browser/indifferent. However, I'm not sure a poll would give us the information we need as it is too binary. It's not about preference as such it's about having a component which serves everyon

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 07/10/15 21:54, Mark Waddingham wrote: So if we had deleted the app browser stack from the build, would your point of view have changed and would you have started to use the project browser? ;) When I finally got to look at a LiveCode 8 build after a week's hiatus with various com

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 10/7/2015 1:22 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote: Far more useful would be constructive criticism of both the Project Browser and the Application Browser. It does seem a little 'silly' to maintain two things which serve essentially the same purpose - so Ali's idea is perhaps the b

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 12:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > > That's just what I remember from the few days I tried to work with it. I'm > not convinced that the current design can accomodate my work style unless it > can at least be revised to show a columnar view rather than a linear one. > What

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

addingham wrote: Far more useful would be constructive criticism of both the Project Browser and the Application Browser. It does seem a little 'silly' to maintain two things which serve essentially the same purpose - so Ali's idea is perhaps the best way forward - what is it that is

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

't pursue it. If the docs could be separated out into a separate window for reference I might have an easier time learning it. It does look powerful and I've heard only good reports about it. If LC 8 really does eliminate the app browser, I'll probably move to Navigator. The clien

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

I am one of the people that generally prefers the Application Browser to the Project Browser, but to be fair I don’t think I gave the PB enough attention to see any of it’s merits. Now that I’ve used the PB a little more in LC8 I have been able to get a slightly better feel for it, so I

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Richmond wrote: > Well, all I can suggest is that LiveCode produces a hybrid > [ chimæ ra ??? ] and see what the response is . . . Maybe that would be useful, but maybe LiveCode Ltd. doesn't need to build it. They have a lot of smart people writing C++ in ways beyond the skills and experience

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

nice but I think it may have suffered from the same single hierarchy issue that the project browser suffers from. At one point I was thinking of making a stack browser that behaved like the column view in the finder but then I realised that the most annoying thing about the application browser i

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Hmmm, I had to bail on LC8… just not ready do deal with too many broken issues right now. I stuck in 7.1 for now… I like the project browser for several reasons (stopped using the application browser 3 months ago) 1) visual representation of objects is very helpful I 2) having the groups

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Monte Goulding wrote: > At one point I was thinking of making a stack browser that behaved > like the column view in the finder but then I realised that the most > annoying thing about the application browser is its use of horizontal > space. Unfortunately it’s the use of horizonta

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

IMO, Jacque makes a number of valid points. In the Project Browser, because stacks and cards are contained in the single view, a long list of controls will remove any stack and card references from view, while in the Application Browser, stacks and cards are always visible. It seems like

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

I think this thread illustrates the problem the team have trying to figure out what type of browser to implement. Everyone has their own ways of working and it's practically impossible to come up with a solution that will keep everyone happy. Perhaps the biggest divide is between the horiz

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Agreed that satisfying everybody will never happen, but I would argue that the dual-pane approach of the Application Browser can display more information in a single view than the Project Browser. IMO, accessing multiple stacks is more efficient using this approach compared to using a single

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On Oct 7, 2015 3:02 PM, "Mark Waddingham" wrote: > > As an indication of community division it might be useful - app browser/project browser/indifferent. > > However, I'm not sure a poll would give us the information we need as it is too binary. I personally don't

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 10/7/2015 6:20 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: IMO, Jacque makes a number of valid points. In the Project Browser, because stacks and cards are contained in the single view, a long list of controls will remove any stack and card references from view, while in the Application Browser, stacks and cards

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

e: >> >> As an indication of community division it might be useful - app >browser/project browser/indifferent. >> >> However, I'm not sure a poll would give us the information we need as it >is too binary. > >I personally don't like either one. I r

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 10/07/2015 11:54 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote: So if we had deleted the app browser stack from the build, would your point of view have changed and would you have started to use the project browser? ;) Wow. I step away for a day and look what happens. Interesting question. I'd probably

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Like others I find the left pane of the app browser pretty useful. I¹ve given the project browser a number of runs but usually end up returning to the app browser because of the way it displays (simply) stacks and cards. I don¹t much like the right pane of the app browser when there are lots of

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

PM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > IMO, Jacque makes a number of valid points. In the Project Browser, > because stacks and cards are contained in the single view, a long list of > controls will remove any stack and card references from view, while in the > Application Browser, stacks an

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

> On 8 Oct 2015, at 2:19 pm, Scott Rossi wrote: > > As soon as we get a means to irregularly distort images, I'm all for that How do you want to distort them? There’s an underlying affine transformation these days doing angle, flip & resize so anything you can do with affine transformations i

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

+1 from me Cheers Rolf > Agreed that satisfying everybody will never happen, but I would argue that > the dual-pane approach of the Application Browser can display more > information in a single view than the Project Browser. IMO, accessing > multiple stacks is more efficien

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

I had to look up "affine" (dude, you're getting technical) and my impression is this type of distortion could be useful. There appears to be a type of transformation named "projective" which, if I understand what it does, would be ideal. Anyway, I posted an example here that illustrates the desir

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

This would be awesome! Paul > On 7 Oct 2015, at 23:37, Scott Rossi wrote: > > I had to look up "affine" (dude, you're getting technical) and my > impression is this type of distortion could be useful. There appears to > be a type of transformation named "projective" which, if I understand what

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

icated the following: Was excited about a new component and tried Project Browser. Did not see any advantages over the Application Browser. Went back to Application Browser. Continues to see Application Browser there, so continues to use Application Browser. i.e. There is was a strong hint that

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

> On 8 Oct 2015, at 5:37 pm, Scott Rossi wrote: > > Anyway, I posted an example here that illustrates the desired options in > LiveCode terms: good (single axis distortion) and best (irregular > distortion). http://tactilemedia.com/download/image_distortion.jpg >

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

simple but full featured under cursor colour picker / finder. http://www.pointandsee.co.uk - made with LiveCode -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/App-Browser-versus-Project-Browser-tp4696976p4697023.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list

AW: App Browser versus Project Browser

+1 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag von J. Landman Gay Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2015 21:58 An: How to use LiveCode Betreff: Re: App Browser versus Project Browser On 10/7/2015 1:22 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

I'm going to abandon AB and PB as soon as RB (Rossi Browser) is ready! ;-D On Oct 8, 2015 3:07 AM, "Monte Goulding" wrote: > > > On 8 Oct 2015, at 5:37 pm, Scott Rossi wrote: > > > > Anyway, I posted an example here that illustrates the desired options in &

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

I am following this discussion and I have the impression that Project Browser refers to the one in LC 7. Ali posted in a different thread (that is why I quote him here) > There may not be many immediately obvious advantages to the new property > inspector, but there are two extraordi

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

J. Landman Gay wrote > On 10/7/2015 6:20 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: >> IMO, Jacque makes a number of valid points. In the Project Browser, >> because stacks and cards are contained in the single view, a long list of >> controls will remove any stack and card references from

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Monte Goulding wrote > > Direct integration between the project browser and the script editor would > be very nice too. Some kind of context mode in the script editor that > would switch the script in the script editor to the selected obhect with > some indication of unsaved or u

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

> On 8 Oct 2015, at 06:47, Martin Koob wrote: > > One question though Jacque says she uses the object IDs in the AB. I don't > see a column for object IDs in the AB. Is it a preference to choose which > columns are shown? Right-click on the column headers in the of the AB and you should see

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Ah! Ok thanks Paul. Martin -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/App-Browser-versus-Project-Browser-tp4696976p4697039.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

Right click on any header in the app browser to toggle visibility of the columns you want to display. On October 8, 2015 8:47:03 AM CDT, Martin Koob wrote: > >One question though Jacque says she uses the object IDs in the AB. I >don't >see a column for object IDs in

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

+50 That about "sums it up" Jacque. ;-) Bob S > On Oct 7, 2015, at 12:58 , J. Landman Gay wrote: > > On 10/7/2015 1:22 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote: >> Far more useful would be constructive criticism of both the Project >> Browser and the Application Browser. I

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > On 10/07/2015 11:54 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote: > >> So if we had deleted the app browser stack from the build, would your >> point of view have changed and would you have started to use the project >> browser? ;) >&

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote: > > i.e. There is was a strong hint that continued usage of the Application > Browser was related to its presence, rather than fondness. > > Essentially I was trying to determine whether it was familiarity or like > which

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 2015-10-08 17:58, Dr. Hawkins wrote: Wow. I step away for a day and look what happens. Interesting question. I'd probably stay with previous builds and cut my ties with a company that's out of touch with its user base. I, too, would probably go searching again. The whole IDE is degrading

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser

On 10/08/2015 09:05 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote: As I said in another post (in reply to the original reply), this wasn't the intent of my post - so apologies for any mis-inference that has been took. Hee. no mis-inference here. You posted a hypothetical question, and I took the bait. No worries

Mimic Chrome Browser Using CEF Browser?

I'm trying to run an HTML page locally within LiveCode using the CEF browser, and the page needs to think it's being accessed by Chrome. Do I use libURLSetCustomHTTPHeaders to do this, or something else? Can anyone explain how? Thanks & Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tac

Re: App Browser versus Project Browser (features)

On 10/7/2015 3:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 10/7/2015 1:22 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote: >> Far more useful would be constructive criticism of both the Project >> Browser and the Application Browser. It does seem a little 'silly' to >> maintain two things which ser

Re: Mimic Chrome Browser Using CEF Browser?

Yes you want to set the user-agent in the http headers: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Format_for_human-operated_web_browsers The new browser widget let's you do that manually as well. On Monday, 16 November 2015, Scott Rossi wrote: > I'm trying to run an HTML page l

browser widget vs. native browser control (iOS)

Hi folks, It’s been a while since I’ve done some work in LiveCode, so I’m kind of diving into LC 8 and trying to figure out the widgets, which look like an awesome feature. We (Read Naturally) have a possible need to “wrap” a web app in a browser control in a native iOS app. We need to get

Application Browser

The Application Browser, which at least 2 of the Use-List members love, has been made inaccessible from the menubar of LiveCode 8. I have knocked together 2 plugin stacks that will, temporarily patch your IDE to rectify this shortcoming: http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2

browser widget

Is anyone playing with the browser widget? I was trying to see if I could use it to do some scraping, but I am running into issues. 1) It seems that certain javascript-laden pages don't function 2) It does not appear that controlling the widget is going to be very easy, e.g. filling in

Re: Browser

> I am again looking at implementing Javascript charts within a LC browser. > Looking at amCharts. > Got a chart displaying easily within the browser widget. > Tries to print the card but the widget does not print. I’m using amCharts in another project and ran into the same problem

Browser Widget

I believe the Browser Widget uses the native browser and in that case it uses the same code as Safari on MacOS? I have been using CanvasJS to create some charts and have been rendering the result in the Browser Widget using Set the URL of ….. These charts have been created on the computer and

Project Browser

Hi all. Did someone say there was a way to get the application browser back? The project browser in it's current form is a bit unusable. A couple times I attempted to drag-reorder the objects, and instead only succeeded at putting one object into another group. I changed the sort ord

Browser widget

The browser widget is very nice in that it is very quick in comparision with using the browser control... but, is there a way to 'autofit', to scale the content to the rect of the widget ? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.

Browser widget

Bug 18420 Not getting very far I'm afraid. Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-li

widget browser

Hi all, I am using widget browser for the first time and I didn’t find the way to load an HTML file to MyBroswer. I especially want to use it in HTML5. I tried set the URL of widget « MyBrowser" to a specific html page, I tried set the htmlText of widget « MyBrowser » to a specific

New browser

Has anyone tried the JavaScript interaction with the new browser yet? Someone has asked me if it works. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com ___ use

browser app?

Hello, I came across this article: http://newsletters.livecode.com/february/issue149/newsletter4.php It describes a browser app for mobile phones. Does anyone know if the app could be adapted for a Windows desktop environment? Thanks for the help! Larry

Browser layering

Okay, next up: I thought all widgets could be layered like any other control. Are browser widgets an exception? Mine always appears on top regardless of its layer. I know this was expected with the revBrowser implementation but was hoping it was different for the widget. -- Jacqueline

Browser selections

Is there a way to get/set selected text in a browser widget? I couldn't find anything. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com ___ use-livecode mailing

Browser selections

Is there a way select text by script in a browser widget? I thought I'd done that before but I don't see a command for it now. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperac

Brave browser

While testing intensively in the LC-HTML5 builder for cross-browser functionality of extensions I used Brave, Chrome, Firefox and Safari. My personal ranking in short: Safari is fastest with huge JS (the standalone engine), Firefox is slowest but has more special features, Chrome has most

Browser widget

Are there any messages than can be used with the browser 'widget', so that you could know when the URL has finished loading, for example ? dixie ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to

browser print?

Does the browser widget support printing like the older revBrowser external did? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ambassa...@fourthworld.com

Re: Browser!!!!

If I was Kevin, I'd be going without sleep tonight. I'm in the same timezone as him :) Bernard On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Monte Goulding wrote: > see subject > > I've just posted this to the KS forum: > > OK, with the @RunRev team hopefully having a good night's rest and with us > very

Re: Browser!!!!

On 28/02/2013, at 2:23 PM, Bernard Devlin wrote: > If I was Kevin, I'd be going without sleep tonight. I'm in the same > timezone as him :) Well... he's probably got to be ready for some media attention tomorrow too If I were him I would have dropped a valium 3 hours ago and be snoring awa

Re: Browser!!!!

begins to convert potential to reality. -- Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Browser-tp4661546p4661549.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-liveco

Re: Browser!!!!

Heather may retract the "you're hired" offer. On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:25 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > >I could be wrong but it is an educated guess and I might get in trouble for > >leaking it ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runr

Re: Browser!!!!

On 28/02/2013, at 2:29 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: > Heather may retract the "you're hired" offer. Well I didn't say I'd accept... hope I don't get in trouble but I just think it's important to keep this thing going. Particularly because this has been the quite time... Now I'm getting fireworks g

Re: Browser!!!!

I completely agree with that sentiment. I was browsing the Real Studio forum the other day, and I found the levels of dissatisfaction there very sad. I have never used RealBasic, but I wish the company and the users success (I love having options). On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:26 AM, tbodine wrote

Re: Browser!!!!

tion.278305.n4.nabble.com/Browser-tp4661546p4661553.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage you

Re: Browser!!!!

tapped out but very interested in that area as well. -- Mark -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Browser-tp4661546p4661554.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-liveco

Re: Browser!!!!

On 28/02/2013, at 2:37 PM, Mark Smith wrote: >> I don't know the cost but I believe the next stretch goal will be an >> overhaul of the database connectivity layer. I could be wrong but it is an >> educated guess and I might get in trouble for leaking it > > Any idea what that might involve?

Re: Browser!!!!

you wish for!!") But LC a year from now should be a very different beast. I can hardly wait -- mark -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Browser-tp4661546p4661556.html Sent from the Revolution - User ma

Re: Browser!!!!

miss the 3am party. Have a good one. Cheers, -- Mark -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Browser-tp4661546p4661557.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-liveco

Re: Browser!!!!

Monte Goulding wrote: >... maybe someone wants a new db connectivity layer ;-) Rather than a third rewrite of the SQL connectors, how about a first version of a MongoDB connector? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for Desktop, Mobile, and Web _

Re: Browser!!!!

We would likely fund a kickstarter or fund this feature alone. An async mongo driver would solve every single programming problem I have right now. Andrew On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Monte Goulding wrote: > > >... maybe someone wants a new db connectivity layer ;-) >

Application Browser

Hello, I was wondering if there was a way to filter what shows in the Application Browser. I find it to be very very noisy. I really do not need to see any stacks that have been opened as a plugin. Can I get rid of them? Is there anything else I can do to trim that list down? Is there an

Rev Browser

Hi all I am having problem with Rev Browser in my new app for MACOSX. Consider this HTML, , why RevBrowser shows this text field with a background color "black" while Safari shows it (correctly) with an orange background color ? All the

Project Browser... BAAAAD!

Hi all. So hearing that I can drag reorder objects in the project browser I thought I’d give it a try. I tried to drag a group up to another position, but it deleted the whole group! No problem, I’ll just revert to saved right? WRONG! Object still deleted! So I closed the stack

6.7.6 Project Browser

I just downloaded 6.7.6 stable and noticed that the PB doesn't seem to be populating. Anyone else? -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oceans. On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours, and did a little diving. And

RFQ: Controllable Browser

I'm looking for someone to help me with my scraping projects. I want to be able to control a browser, including navigating, pulling all the goodies off of a page, click links, buttons, etc., fill forms, and scrape. Think of this as RoboBrowser for LC. -- On the first day, God create

Browser widget scrolling

This does not appear to work: set the hScrollbar of widget “myBrowser" to false The scrollbar becomes visible when you drag resize a window. I was expecting there to ne no scrollbar at all. Also the checkboxes in the properties section (horizontal and vertical) do not work. They are always se

Browser Widget Issue

I’m having trouble keeping track of which framework the browser widget uses - on MacOS is it using webkit or Chromium? A url I am trying to access is blank - https://obs.ninja  - while it is showing in Safari and Chrome on the desktop - any suggestions

Fix The Browser!

Aloha Panagiotis Merakos Browers Bug: https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23267 What are we doing? This is “really serious” . The API Dictionery does not work for iOS allowUserInteraction property set the allowUserInteraction of widget to allowInteraction browserDocumentLoadBegin

Project browser docs

Where is the documentation for the project browser? There's nothing in the User Guides in the dictionary. There are several mentions in the User Guide under the Help menu but they all refer to managing datagrids. There is one mention "for more details, see the section on the projec

LC8 Browser widget

Is it the intention to add printing functionality to this widget? Thanks Terry ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.c

Re: Project Browser

On 24/05/2016 15:44, Bob Sneidar wrote: Did someone say there was a way to get the application browser back? The project browser in it's current form is a bit unusable. A couple times I attempted to drag-reorder the objects, and instead only succeeded at putting one object into another

Re: Project Browser

It isn't my cup of tea either. But for those of us who don't like it, the Application Browser is "still there", but, I assume, it is frozen, and in time may prove a bit "lumpy" with new versions of Livecode. But by then, either the Project Browser will be

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >