Certainly not the pundits of the day. I was the only one here at work of all
the old Mac Fanatics who said the pundits were wrong. You know, now that you
mention it, I still to this day have not heard a single retraction or
acknowledgement either from the pundits of the day, or from my co-worker
I got in at $9.40 at the end of the Scully days.
Wish I'd not sold when it reached $24 ... but who would have though that it
would got the heights t's at now?
Tim
On Jun 11, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>
>> You may be right, b
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
> You may be right, but remember that Apple's share price was at $12 at the
> time. So, many thought OSX wasn't important then.
>
It never got down to $12 in the dark days.
I was waiting for $13.50, figuring it would be taken over for liqui
You may be right, but remember that Apple's share price was at $12 at the time.
So, many thought OSX wasn't important then.
On Jun 11, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> >The number of Linux users is estimated at more than 20 million, making it
> >one-third as important as OS X is, and
I should have said, "Richard and Richmond." ;-)
Bob
On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Richmond wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 08:00 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> Well put. And I would add that because of the nature of Linux, it really is
>> up to the end user to sort out the problems they are having with a
>
Speaking of the WWDC event and Linux:
One of the WWDC speakers just noted that there are now some 60 million
Mac users, roughly tripled over the last decade.
The number of Linux users is estimated at more than 20 million, making
it one-third as important as OS X is, and as relevant as OS X wa
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> ...because of the nature of Linux, it really is up to the end
> user to sort out the problems they are having with a particular
> configuration on a particular machine, because realistically,
> they are the only person with access to it. This is the "price"
> you pay (or shou
On 06/11/2012 08:00 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Well put. And I would add that because of the nature of Linux, it really is up to the end
user to sort out the problems they are having with a particular configuration on a
particular machine, because realistically, they are the only person with access
Well put. And I would add that because of the nature of Linux, it really is up
to the end user to sort out the problems they are having with a particular
configuration on a particular machine, because realistically, they are the only
person with access to it. This is the "price" you pay (or shou
if it's the xml external, then it might be usefulto know that I am using the
sqlite external, but not the xml external in bvgdocu2.
http://bjoernke.com/bvgdocu/
On 10.06.2012, at 20:50, Richmond wrote:
> Further to my ongoing problems with the documentation stacks of RR/LC 3.5,
> 4.0 and 4.5 c
On Jun 10, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Richmond wrote:
> Further to my ongoing problems with the documentation stacks of RR/LC 3.5,
> 4.0 and 4.5 crashing
> the IDE something really odd has emerged:
>
> At home I currently have 3 machines running Ubuntu variants, let me be
> original and call them:
>
>
Further to my ongoing problems with the documentation stacks of RR/LC
3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 crashing
the IDE something really odd has emerged:
At home I currently have 3 machines running Ubuntu variants, let me be
original and call them:
Machine 1: Xubuntu 12.04 installed from a Xubuntu install di
12 matches
Mail list logo
