Re: Will Apple Gatekeeper changes break our standalones?

Thanks, Trevor. I hate waiting until the support requests roll in, so like you I'm trying to get ahead of this. Thanks for sharing your insights. Please continue to do so! Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Will-Apple-Gatekeeper-ch

Re: Will Apple Gatekeeper changes break our standalones?

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:18 PM, tbodine wrote: > Also, from the rest of the Apple message about Gatekeeper, sounds like this > has potential to disrupt other standalones due to new bundle structure > requirements for codesigning... > > "Structure your bundle accord

Will Apple Gatekeeper changes break our standalones?

Apple sent developers this news last week: "With the release of OS X Mavericks 10.9.5, the way that OS X recognizes signed apps will change. Signatures created with OS X Mountain Lion 10.8.5 or earlier (v1 signatures) will be obsoleted and Gatekeeper will no longer recognize them. User

Gatekeeper

Here's a piece written about Apple's gatekeeper by one of the coders at Panic (creators of Coda) : http://www.panic.com/blog/2012/02/about-gatekeeper/ -- Stephen Barncard San Francisco Ca. USA more about sqb <http://www.google.com/prof

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Thanks a lot Pete ... ... found also this (/open source/) : https://github.com/roddi/ValidateStoreReceipt ... which include an XCode project so ... I have to understand how the include/modify for an OSX External for LiveCode :-\ About validating receipts : https://developer.apple.com/librar

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Hi Guglielmo, I found a program in the Mac App store that generates an ANSI C MAs receipt checking module for your application. The URL is http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/receigen/id452840086?mt=12 The price of $24.99 seems well worthwhile but I assume it would need an external interface to be bui

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

I dont think thats right. Thats the iTunes, or iPhone limit, but it doesnt seem to apply to the MAS. Ive installed on 8 so far and never hit a limit. The issue however is you do need your iTunes username and password to install an app you have purchased, and anyone sharing that may find other

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

In what way, Lynn? other than what I just described On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Lynn Fredricks < lfredri...@proactive-intl.com> wrote: > > Dreamhost plans start at about $8.95/mo - unlimited domains, > > storage and bandwidth. Upgrading to Virtual personal servers > > (with root access)

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

OK that's definitly better than unlimited. I'm not really stressing out too much on this because my current licensing scheme certainly isn't foolproof, but I expected that a licnesing scheme from Apple would have been tighter. Pete lcSQL Software On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Oic. I was under the impression that you could sign in, install an app, then sign out, but you are saying it works like iTunes. Bob On May 10, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Tim Jones wrote: > Actually, you're limited to 5 installations as you can only authorize 5 > machines to one MAS account at a time.

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Actually, you're limited to 5 installations as you can only authorize 5 machines to one MAS account at a time. MAS Hysteria, I think... Tim On May 10, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Because I can install it on all 250 Macs I have here at work after paying for > it only once. That woul

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Because I can install it on all 250 Macs I have here at work after paying for it only once. That would still be piracy. Bob On May 10, 2012, at 1:13 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 5/10/12 12:14 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > >> More important than that though is Andrew's comment about users bein

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Sure, but if you don't need all that, then you *could* save a lot of money in the long term. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 We will have room for

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

On 5/10/12 3:41 PM, Andre Garzia wrote: Mark, To each their own. I still advocate for VPSs... Agreed. JaguarPC lets us be resellers too, and offers good incentives for those who care to do it. I could resell any number of accounts if I wanted to become a full-time IT person. I'd get a pretty

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Hi Alex, If you're interested in specific features, then you should contact me off-list. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 We will have room for new

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Sure, advocate as much as you like. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 We will have room for new projects after 1 June. Contact me now and be first in

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

I figure it is, or should be, a common question, so I'll ask on-list support for revServer ? and while I'm here ... support for rev CGI ? How about support for ssl (if that's possible ??) Thanks -- Alex. On 10/05/2012 17:53, Mark Schonewille wrote: Hi, If you have some problems with

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Mark, To each their own. I still advocate for VPSs... On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Mark Schonewille < m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote: > Or you pay much less (less than 1 euro per month), if you just want to > host a small website while still enjoying all common features. > > -- >

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Or you pay much less (less than 1 euro per month), if you just want to host a small website while still enjoying all common features. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogram

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Things are so cheap these days that there is no reason not to go with a VPS hosting. Instead of paying from 5 to 10 monthly, you can pay just a little big more and be root. You may not know how to do linux stuff but once you need to install some odd library or software you will be happy that you we

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

So? -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 We will have room for new projects after 1 June. Contact me now and be first in line. On 10 mei 2012, at 22:21

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

On 5/10/12 3:17 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote: JaguarPC is at least 4 times more expensive than Economy-x-Talk. Just sayin' ;-) It has more resources. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com __

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

JaguarPC is at least 4 times more expensive than Economy-x-Talk. Just sayin' ;-) -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 We will have room for new projects

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

On 5/10/12 12:14 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: More important than that though is Andrew's comment about users being able to download as many copies as they want from the Apple Store after paying for a single license. If that really is the case, MAS does no more to protect against piracy than the li

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

On 5/10/12 2:36 PM, Andre Garzia wrote: Folks, I recommend http://jaguarpc.com they are very reliable and their support rocks. I like JaguarPC too. Their hosting packages are reasonable and include unlimited everything (bandwidth, domains, email addresses, etc.) I've been with them 11 years

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

I guess what attracted me to fatcow was their free drag and drop site builder tool which has a bunch of templates available. I have a passing knowledge of html but I have enough to do getting product out the door without having to spend a lot of time designing a web site and writing html to suppor

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Folks, I recommend http://jaguarpc.com they are very reliable and their support rocks. For those that can maintain their own servers, I recommend http://linode.com. Linode is like having your own little cloud but you're responsible for everything. JaguarPC is a managed host, so you can call suppo

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Very useful to know. Thanks Stephen ! Pierre Le 10 mai 2012 à 18:48, stephen barncard a écrit : > At the risk of being a spokesman > > Dreamhost plans start at about $8.95/mo - unlimited domains, storage and > bandwidth. Upgrading to Virtual personal servers (with root access) is easy > and

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

My strategy for all this is going to be to just get my app signed initially. That will take care of the Gatekeeper issue. As for the Apple Store, it seems the issues are: The license agreement. It seems that the Apple Store requires you to use the .pkg method of installing and if I remember

RE: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

> Dreamhost plans start at about $8.95/mo - unlimited domains, > storage and bandwidth. Upgrading to Virtual personal servers > (with root access) is easy and done in the control panel. Stephen, Could you describe your experiences setting up LiveCode based projects on Dreamhost? Best regards,

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

I love those guys. They still kicking around? Bob On May 10, 2012, at 9:48 AM, stephen barncard wrote: > I've been with them since 2002 since I hooked up > the Crosby Stills and Nash website with them. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@li

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Hi, If you have some problems with your hosting account, you can host your website with Economy-x-Talk for only 11 euro per year. All features such as IMAP mail, PHP, CGI, MySQL, FTP, etc., are included. Feel free to contact me off-list for more info. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Econom

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

one more thing -- shell access on even the cheapest plan. On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, stephen barncard < stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote: > At the risk of being a spokesman > > Dreamhost plans start at about $8.95/mo - unlimited domains, storage and > bandwidth. Upgrading to Virtu

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

At the risk of being a spokesman Dreamhost plans start at about $8.95/mo - unlimited domains, storage and bandwidth. Upgrading to Virtual personal servers (with root access) is easy and done in the control panel. Downgrading if you change your mind is also easy. They have their own perl coders

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Hi Bill, Yes I believe you're right on the number of pages, my mistake. I think it came about because they keep offering to upgrade me to their pro level web site builder for an extra monthly cost to eliminate the page number limit. I'm only using POP email with them so can't comment on the IMAP

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

I am using On-Rev, but I don't host websites there (yet). I got one of the lifetime memberships when it first came out, so I pay nothing each year. Bob On May 9, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote: > I'm looking for a new hosting company and FatCow gets some pretty good > reviews and seems

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Hi Andy, thanks for your reply. Yes, I know well that is quite complicate and, probably, impossible to do totally in pure LiveCode, so ... ... who has an external to *validate* the 'MAS receipt file' ??? It's a commercial product ??? Where we can get ??? :-) I think that very soon this wi

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Its quite complicated using your own code, took me quite a while to figure it out! I believe there is an external available however (from Obleo?) which takes care of it all if you dont fancy tackling it yourself. On 10 May 2012, at 10:25, Guglielmo Braguglia wrote: > Hi Andy, > maybe you mis

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Hi Andy, maybe you missed my previous eMail on this list ... :-) Please, can you clarify how you *validate* the 'MAS receipt file' from a LiveCode application ? Thanks in advance, Regards, Guglielmo On 10.05.2012 11:03, Andrew Henshaw wrote: Yes, a MAS reciept file is inserted into your

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

anism that checks against my web site. I >> guess >>> this also makes me wonder if I can provide a download directly from my >> web >>> site if I sell through the app store? >>> >>> Pete >>> lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> >

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Yes. Gatekeeper and the Mac App Store are two totally separate things, Ill just keep this reply back on the original Gatekeeper thread to avoid confusion. Ive just been playing with gatekeeper signing this morning, took 15 minutes max to get the developer id from Appe, then sign an app

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Henshaw wrote: > > > > > The MAS store does not offer a demo or trial version, people just buy > > it. > > > If they want a demo they can go to your website and try that. > > > > > &g

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

ot offer a demo or trial version, people just buy > it. > > If they want a demo they can go to your website and try that. > > > > I don't understand. I thought the origin of this post was to do with > GateKeeper and avoiding the hassle of it cautioning a user that you

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

Hi Andy, please, can you clarify this point ? How you check the validity of the 'MAS receipt file' from inside a LiveCode program ? Thanks in advance, Regards, Guglielmo On 09.05.2012 23:37, Andrew Henshaw wrote: ... Then add in the checking of the 'MAS reciept file' and you are good to

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

I used their live chat feature (very nice BTW) and they say the limits on pages are when using their build tools. If you build your site and FTP the files up there is no limit to the number of pages. They claim that IMAP is supported even thought he web site says just POP. And they do provide a

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Pete, I only see two types of accounts and one isn't really much of an account other than a place to park a domain. The other one says unlimited domains but I don't see any mention of number of web pages. It looks like they only support POP email no IMAP. Do you have access to the server logs

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows > The Ultimate Collection of Winsock Software ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url t

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Henshaw wrote: > The MAS store does not offer a demo or trial version, people just buy it. > If they want a demo they can go to your website and try that. > > I don't understand. I thought the origin of this post was to do with GateKe

Re: Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

Hi Bill, I'm using fatcow as I mentioned and have been generally happy with them. As background, I wanted somewhere that would get a web site up and running quickly with the minimum of html coding necessary from me. Fatcow have a basic drag and drop web designer (Weebly) which I used and more ful

Hosting Companies: Was Gatekeeper

I'm looking for a new hosting company and FatCow gets some pretty good reviews and seems reasonably priced at just under $5 per month. What are you folks using who are happy with their hosting company? Bill Vlahos _ InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping your imp

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Henshaw wrote: > > > >> Yes it will, ive had an app rejected for writing to the preferences > >> folder. > >> > >> I stick with ~/Library/Application Support/ and just put

Re: [OT] Mac App Store (was Gatekeeper)

M, Andrew Henshaw wrote: > >> Yes it will, ive had an app rejected for writing to the preferences >> folder. >> >> I stick with ~/Library/Application Support/ and just put >> everything in there. >> >> From June 1st there is also sandboxing to contend wi

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

They keep putting it back, the current deadline is June 1st, after that all new apps and updates will have to be sandboxed, unless of course they put it back again! On 9 May 2012, at 20:00, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Wasn't there a discussion that the sandbox would become mandatory at some > poi

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

n Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Henshaw wrote: > Yes it will, ive had an app rejected for writing to the preferences > folder. > > I stick with ~/Library/Application Support/ and just put > everything in there. > > From June 1st there is also sandboxing to contend wit

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

in there. >> >> From June 1st there is also sandboxing to contend with for the Mac App >> Store, but I understand sandboxing and the gatekeeper are two totally >> separate requirements, If I understand correctlt the gatekeeper just needs >> the code to be signed and i

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

st put > everything in there. > > From June 1st there is also sandboxing to contend with for the Mac App > Store, but I understand sandboxing and the gatekeeper are two totally > separate requirements, If I understand correctlt the gatekeeper just needs > the code to be signed and it doe

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

I take that back. http://www.fatcow.com/free-icons > They must be only for subscribers. There is no link on the home page for > downloads or icons. > > Bob > > > On May 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > >> By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows and my >

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

They must be only for subscribers. There is no link on the home page for downloads or icons. Bob On May 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows and my > web host is fatcow (who incidentally have a huge selection of 32x32

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Yes it will, ive had an app rejected for writing to the preferences folder. I stick with ~/Library/Application Support/ and just put everything in there. >From June 1st there is also sandboxing to contend with for the Mac App Store, >but I understand sandboxing and the gatekeeper a

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Someone that "Orks" cows. :-P On May 9, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Jerry Jensen wrote: > And, what the heck is a coworker? > > On May 9, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Tim Jones wrote: > >> And don't forget "Don't have a cow, Man!", or Cowabunga, or holy cow!. I >> believe it's a bovine plot to take over our ti

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

And, what the heck is a coworker? On May 9, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Tim Jones wrote: > And don't forget "Don't have a cow, Man!", or Cowabunga, or holy cow!. I > believe it's a bovine plot to take over our time line (veiled reference to > Heinlein's "Number of the Beast"). > > :-O > > Tim > > On

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

And don't forget "Don't have a cow, Man!", or Cowabunga, or holy cow!. I believe it's a bovine plot to take over our time line (veiled reference to Heinlein's "Number of the Beast"). :-O Tim On May 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows and my web host is fatcow (who incidentally have a huge selection of 32x32 and 16x16 icons available for free and royalty free). Pete lcSQL Software On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote: > P

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Thanks Bill, checking into all these. Pete lcSQL Software On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote: > Pete, > > Here are some links that were instrumental to me for code signing > InfoWallet and one of them has a link to a $49 commercial application to > help ma

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Matthias, Thanks for the link to the article. I've started the process and have doen as much as I can until my Apple Developer Program membership is activated. Maybe this question will be answered once I can get to the Mac Store Guidelines document, but the article says you have to store prefs fi

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi, seems i found an answer already. The revUp newsletter #112 contains an article how to submit an livecode app to the mac app store. http://runrev.com/newsletter/june/issue112/newsletter4.php I just hope that this still works. Regards, Matthias Am 09.05.2012 um 11:54 schrieb Matthias Rebb

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi, Am 08.05.2012 um 11:22 schrieb Andrew Henshaw: > As far as I was aware all you need to do is sign your apps, if you publish > an app to the Mac App Store it already has to be signed. > > To do this you need the $ 99/year Apple Developer Program, and then you can > use a few simple termin

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi Pete, get a look there : http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/ ... cheap and with a free, nice utility, to 'sign' your Win applications (/... I use this with my LiveCode Windows Applications, on Mac I'm on the Developer Program and, in the annual fee, it's included the certificate to sign your

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Pete, Here are some links that were instrumental to me for code signing InfoWallet and one of them has a link to a $49 commercial application to help make is easier. I haven't looked at it (doing it the hard way myself) but if it is half as good as they describe it would be worth it. Code sign

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

other hoop to go through if you want to > deploy you the Mac OS without your clients getting warning messages. > > As part of the program you also get access to the pre-release software so > you can test to ensure your apps dont get snagged by the gatekeeper. > > Andy > > >

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

all, its just another hoop to go through if you want to deploy you the Mac OS without your clients getting warning messages. As part of the program you also get access to the pre-release software so you can test to ensure your apps dont get snagged by the gatekeeper. Andy On 8 May 2012, at

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

: > Why is this "[OT}"? Won't Apple's use of Gatekeeper affect Livecode apps > for OS X? I would hate it if every person who wants to try my software > would get a message from Gatekeeper that "this might be malware. Are really > you sure that you want to run

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Why is this "[OT}"? Won't Apple's use of Gatekeeper affect Livecode apps for OS X? I would hate it if every person who wants to try my software would get a message from Gatekeeper that "this might be malware. Are really you sure that you want to run it?" Are Livec

Re: Gatekeeper

Yeah I guess it's not totally off topic. I believe there was a thread a while back about Gatekeeper and the dire warning that would ensue in Mountain Lion if a user tried to install an app that wasn't signed. Pete On Apr 30, 2012 4:10 PM, "Mark Wieder" wrote: > Pete- >

Re: Gatekeeper

Pete- Monday, April 30, 2012, 2:26:05 PM, you wrote: > Probably old news to some folks but thought it would be worth sharing. I got that email too, and it was news to me. I'm removing the (OT) from the subject line, as this seems quite relevant. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net __

[OT] Gatekeeper

Just got a newsletter from Apple with this link to a page about the Mountain Lion Gatekeeper ID: https://developer.apple.com/resources/developer-id/ Probably old news to some folks but thought it would be worth sharing. Pete lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

It is possible to get Linux apps running using the Linux compatibility libs, but I'm thinking more in a native manner. Tim On Feb 17, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Mike Bonner wrote: > I'm not positive, but didn't Andre get livecode running on bsd by > installing some linux binary support libraries or som

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

I'm not positive, but didn't Andre get livecode running on bsd by installing some linux binary support libraries or some such? Or maybe it was livecode server that was beaten into submission I forget. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tim Jones wrote: > Actually, thank Linus Torvalds for Linux.

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

Actually, thank Linus Torvalds for Linux. If you have the drive, it is possible to build a Linus system with no GNU tools and code - in that case, thank the FreeBSD guys. Speaking of which, how about a LiveCode version for FreeBSD? Tim On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote: > Tha

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

On 17/02/2012 14:59, Richard Gaskin wrote: Looks like Apple's message is clear: if you want to run Linux you'll need to buy your computer from System 76 or ZaReason. Thanks for the tip, Apple. ;) Looking at their site this morning it seems System 76 just refreshed their line... Interesting.

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

Roger Eller wrote: Nobody is safe. The latest incarnation of MacBook Pro hardware WILL NOT boot a live CD of any Linux distro. We tried 10 different ones including Ubuntu, Debian, Suse, Slackware, Mint, and other less-known distros. So, Apple is blocking bootloaders too. Looks like Apple's m

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote: > Thank gnu for Linux. > > Bernard > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ken Corey wrote: > > Companies are yearning for total control, for better or worse. > > Nobody is safe. The latest incarnation of MacBook Pro hardware WILL NOT boot a li

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

Thank gnu for Linux. Bernard On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ken Corey wrote: > Companies are yearning for total control, for better or worse. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe

[OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

> Gatekeeper can be configured to download anything you like, if you like. The main Problem here is that most people won't. Most users never ever change the default settings. So my prediction is: If you create Mac Software (and soon windows too), it is "Sign or die, App store or di

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

On 16/02/2012 21:25, François Chaplais wrote: Richard, Gatekeeper can be configured to download anything you like, if you like. For now. I do love my iPad, but my biggest heartache with it is that apps that I would like to have free and unfettered access can't (Codea is a great ex

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

Impressive young Skywalker! On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Looks like I may rival Punxsutawney Phil in the prognostication department - > consider the screen shot in this article: > > <http://www.macrumors.com/2012/02/16/gatekeeper-already-present

Re: [OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

Richard, Gatekeeper can be configured to download anything you like, if you like. Le 16 févr. 2012 à 21:53, Richard Gaskin a écrit : > Looks like I may rival Punxsutawney Phil in the prognostication department - > consider the screen shot in this article: > > <http://www.macrum

[OT] OS X's Gatekeeper

Looks like I may rival Punxsutawney Phil in the prognostication department - consider the screen shot in this article: <http://www.macrumors.com/2012/02/16/gatekeeper-already-present-in-os-x-10-7-3-available-for-developer-testing/> ...and the one in this LiveCode Journal blog post from O