Forget it… too long a day.. .I needed another segment my path…
sorry for the noise
Amazing how hard this is for me… I must be super dense or something is really
missing in the docs.
OK , so you say we don't need to use "go" to get stacks into memory
I have this in my loader stack
put ( get
Amazing how hard this is for me… I must be super dense or something is really
missing in the docs.
OK , so you say we don't need to use "go" to get stacks into memory
I have this in my loader stack
put ( getPathForSharedLibraries() & "itemMetadataParser.livecodescript") into
tMediaParser
put
But LiveCode is not C. In LiveCode an array is a value, not a special kind of
variable.
put "abcd" into cup 1 of that egg carton in the box labeled
"alphabetBlocks"
(I know, Dar sees the world funny.)
> On Jul 9, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 7/9/2016 1:39 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> After all, how does one express an array in English? :)
>
> "Egg carton". Devin taught me that while brandishing a prop at one of
> our teaching sessions.
>
>put "abcd" into cup 1 of eggcarton "alphabetBlocks"
Conceptually
ext:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Getting-Library-Stacks-into-Memory-tp4706461p4706515.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
On 7/9/2016 1:39 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
After all, how does one express an array in English? :)
"Egg carton". Devin taught me that while brandishing a prop at one of
our teaching sessions.
put "abcd" into cup 1 of eggcarton "alphabetBlocks"
At first I thought it was some kind of yolk b
Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 07/09/2016 10:13 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> One might even say it becomes the "parent script" of the control.
>>
>> If only we had a word to describe that unique role clearly... ;)
>
> Ah... the problems of trying to set up a one-to-one correspondence
> between techni
On 07/09/2016 10:13 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
One might even say it becomes the "parent script" of the control.
If only we had a word to describe that unique role clearly... ;)
Ah... the problems of trying to set up a one-to-one correspondence
between technical terms and natural language. I
Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 10:57 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>> I seem to remember inserting the script of a stack into back at some
>> point in the past.
>
> Probably also worth pointing out here that if you assign a behavior
> to a control, the behavior acts as a backscript to that contro
On 07/08/2016 10:57 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I seem to remember inserting the script of a stack into back at some
point in the past.
Probably also worth pointing out here that if you assign a behavior to a
control, the behavior acts as a backscript to that control.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw.
I seem to remember inserting the script of a stack into back at some point
in the past. I know for sure you can start using the stack which is
effectively the same thing.
The main thing is that you don't need to "go" there to load the stack into
RAM. Just putting it in use does that, as does a
On 07/08/2016 12:48 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
insert the script of the stack into front or back
Now *that* would be an interesting addition to the language
"...surprise me, Trebek..."
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing
Jacque wrote: "insert the script of the stack into front or back"
The dictionary implies that this can only be done with an "object" , hence the
assumption (probably wrong) that one needs to have the stack open…
I assume you mean that we can do it like this now with script only stacks
insert
t all the go invisible commands on start up are still breaking
the loading. We'll fix that today
Swasti Astu! Be Well
( from my mobile )
_
From: J. Landman Gay mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Getting Lib
These almost sound like undefined errors with the group name as the object
hint.
Mobile apps can only have one window at a time, and each "go" replaces the
previous window. If you go to an invisible stack you'll see black. In
general don't use "go" for that kind of thing, just using the stack
Our new app was loading nicely on the iPhone.. .we externalized a lot of code
to scripts that are meant to be used in front, back and as behaviors… with the
go stack
cmd
logInfo "Loading frontscript" && tStackPath
go stack (getPathForSharedLibraries() & tStackPath)
insert the script of stack
16 matches
Mail list logo