Mark:
> Is there any chance you can package up the files used to test
> along with the stack and submit as an issue to BZ?
> That way we can take a look to see what is causing
> the significant differences with C and E, in particular?
Here it is!
I just posted the set of test files
(and r
On 2021-11-05 12:32, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote:
Absolutely; thanks!
I'll do that within the next few days.
(Should I use the old speed bug 21561 or a new one?)
If you just add it as another example stack to Bug 21561 that would be
fine - there's a good chance its multiple actual
Mark:
> Is there any chance you can package up the files used to test
> along with the stack and submit as an issue to BZ?
> That way we can take a look to see what is causing
> the significant differences with C and E, in particular?
Absolutely; thanks!
I'll do that within the next few days.
(
On 2021-11-05 11:05, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote:
My first LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test -
Results on Windows 10, current WordLib
Ratings:
- LC 9.6.5 RC 2 vs LC 9.6.3: 5 Wins, 0 Losses
- LC 9.6.5 RC 2 vs LC 6.7.11: 2 Wins, 3 Losses
Conclusion:
Good progress; if we follow up on
My first LC 9.6.5 RC 2 Speed Test -
Results on Windows 10, current WordLib
- LC 9.6.3:
A.docx - 0.073 seconds
B.docx - 0.518 seconds
C.docx - 0.321 seconds
D.docx - 0.314 seconds
E.docx - 9.202 seconds
- LC 9.6.5 RC 2:
A.docx - 0.05 seconds
B.docx - 0.484 seconds
C.docx - 0.284 seconds
