$Millions like the satellites they controlled.
Horses for Courses !
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/LiveCode-has-a-new-eye-on-the-earth-tp4660466p4660712.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
I don't think the world needs less "bitchers", I don't think that is possible.
What the world needs is far fewer people who listen to them. :-)
Hey! That is going on my Facebook page!
Bob
On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote:
> Lotus Notes was basically destroyed by professional
Bernard-
Thank you. Yes, you're making my point quite well, but I can't tell whether that
was the intention or whether you're trying to argue against it.
For sheer functionality and showcasing the power of LiveCode, it's hard to beat
the Landsat application. But I'd argue that displaying screensh
On 13.02.2013 at 10:24 Uhr + Bernard Devlin apparently wrote:
Critcising the aesthetics of programmes produced by RAD tools has often
been a way in which "professional programmers" have rubbished the useful
(yet unpolished) tools that literally ran many businesses. The same thing
happened wi
Well said...:-)
Dixie
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:24:02 +
> From: bdrun...@gmail.com
> Critcising the aesthetics of programmes produced by RAD tools has often
> been a way in which "professional programmers" have rubbished the useful
> (yet unpolished) tools that literally ran many businesse
Critcising the aesthetics of programmes produced by RAD tools has often
been a way in which "professional programmers" have rubbished the useful
(yet unpolished) tools that literally ran many businesses. The same thing
happened with Lotus Notes. It was an environment that permitted thousands
of n
The key phrase here is (paraphrased): "We load 3000 to 4000 commands into
the spacecraft daily. It's vital that we check every single command to
ensure it will execute properly and without harming any part of the
spacecraft. This check is always done under a short deadline, and it used
to take thre
On Feb 12, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> I don't care about the webpage. Halfway down there's a screenshot of the
> LiveCode UI command panel. That's the part I'm complaining about. Yes, I do
> get
> your point about this being an impressive system, but the part that shows what
> LC look
Peter M. Brigham writes:
>
> The NASA people didn't create the webpage. Quarrel with the page design if you
will, using LC to run a major
> satellite data system is impressive. That's the point. It's worth letting
people know about it.
>
I don't care about the webpage. Halfway down there's a s
Geoff Canyon writes:
>
> If I had a dollar for every quick hack I've bodged together over the
> years...
Sure - and that goes for all of us. But the OP said
"I love to use the NASA Landsat as an example of how LC is not just a hobbyist's
language!"
and I would draw the line at promoting a qui
The NASA people didn't create the webpage. Quarrel with the page design if you
will, using LC to run a major satellite data system is impressive. That's the
point. It's worth letting people know about it.
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
On Feb 12, 20
If I had a dollar for every quick hack I've bodged together over the
years...
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
> Actually LiveCode is perfect for quick single purpose/single user app
> development. I don't see why that should give it a bad name.
>
> --
> M E R Goulding
> S
Actually LiveCode is perfect for quick single purpose/single user app
development. I don't see why that should give it a bad name.
--
M E R Goulding
Software development services
mergExt - There's an external for that!
On 13/02/2013, at 8:15 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Looks like a quick hack.
>
Geoff Canyon writes:
> Who created it?
Looks like a quick hack.
It's the sort of thing that gives LiveCode a bad name...
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Who created it?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:43 PM, stephen barncard <
stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote:
> I'm impressed by the unimpressive-ness of the interface. It was probably
> written before 2002.
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>
> > I guess, just don't use
I'm impressed by the unimpressive-ness of the interface. It was probably
written before 2002.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
> I guess, just don't use the phrase "you don't have to be a rocket
> scientist to use LiveCode".
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Monte Goulding
I guess, just don't use the phrase "you don't have to be a rocket scientist to
use LiveCode".
On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
> >I'm sure it's perfectly usable to those that know how to use it ;-)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use
I'm sure it's perfectly usable to those that know how to use it ;-)
On 13/02/2013, at 6:22 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Yow! That is one *ugly* interface. I'd just as soon not advertise that as our
> poster child.
--
Monte Goulding
M E R Goulding - software development services
mergExt - There's a
18 matches
Mail list logo
