Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-31 Thread Richard Gaskin
Lagi Pittas wrote: > Richard > > You totally missed my point. It seems we missed each other's points. Mine was about ROI. > First off if the website is taking 24 hours of the developers time > then there is a problem. I went on the main site and there was a link > to the documentation yesterd

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-31 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Richmond wrote: > her Mum doesn't want to watch it alone because she takes all of it > literally and needs my wife to hold her hand whenever some gets shot, ends > up in prison, Joey, have you ever . . . :) -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-31 Thread Richmond
On 31.08.2016 12:46, Lagi Pittas wrote: Richard You totally missed my point. First off if the website is taking 24 hours of the developers time then there is a problem. I went on the main site and there was a link to the documentation yesterday - and guess what page not found - it happens all

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-31 Thread Lagi Pittas
Richard You totally missed my point. First off if the website is taking 24 hours of the developers time then there is a problem. I went on the main site and there was a link to the documentation yesterday - and guess what page not found - it happens all the time, I given up even bothering to look

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-30 Thread Monte Goulding
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 6:57 AM, Iphonelagi wrote: > > Why do we say RR has to spend more on marketing? > They have a marketing person and somebody looking after the website > Seems like they are doing the minimum at work and that's it. > Am I being harsh or just stating the obvious it doesn't cos

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-30 Thread Richard Gaskin
Iphonelagi wrote: > Why do we say RR has to spend more on marketing? > They have a marketing person and somebody looking after the website > Seems like they are doing the minimum at work and that's it. > Am I being harsh or just stating the obvious it doesn't cost any > extra money to do what Ric

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-30 Thread Iphonelagi
Why do we say RR has to spend more on marketing? They have a marketing person and somebody looking after the website Seems like they are doing the minimum at work and that's it. Am I being harsh or just stating the obvious it doesn't cost any extra money to do what Richmond did and search these s

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-30 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Richmond wrote: > It must be one of the few Dr Seuss books that didn't make it "across the > pond" as I was brought > up on Dr Seuss books even though I wasn't a child in the USA. > > I would be glad of the reference so I can have a chance to catch up. > good "s

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-29 Thread Richmond
On 30.08.2016 03:53, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) Also, I can read with both eyes shut. (hmm, probably means nothing to non US folks. It's a very late Dr. Seuss book).

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-29 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) > Also, I can read with both eyes shut. (hmm, probably means nothing to non US folks. It's a very late Dr. Seuss book). -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) Bob S On Aug 28, 2016, at 09:01 , Dr. Hawkins mailto:doch...@gmail.com>> wrote: And for straight C, I can think of a couple of huge examples without even thinking . . . ___ u

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
Thinking even. Bob S On Aug 29, 2016, at 10:17 , Bob Sneidar mailto:bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com>> wrote: If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) Bob S On Aug 28, 2016, at 09:01 , Dr. Hawkins mailto:doch...@gmail.com>> wrote: And for straight C, I can thi

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-28 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > There are no hobbyist C++ developers (who produce useful > applications/utilities that is). Just offhand,there's LyX . . . And for straight C, I can think of a couple of huge examples without even thinking . . . Unlike every other language

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-28 Thread Kay C Lan
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > There are no hobbyist C++ developers (who produce useful > applications/utilities that is). SourceForge isn't exactly the 'in' place for OSS these days but even so I think it does represent a location (indication) where part time and hob

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-27 Thread Richmond
Very well thought out. On 27.08.2016 02:23, Bob Sneidar wrote: As I have mentioned before in such threads, large companies need to consider a number of factors when working with custom software solutions, not the least of which is being able to find another developer who can code in the same e

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-26 Thread Bob Sneidar
As I have mentioned before in such threads, large companies need to consider a number of factors when working with custom software solutions, not the least of which is being able to find another developer who can code in the same environment as the one who drove off a bridge, or got hit by a met

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-26 Thread Heriberto Torrado González
Well, in our business, we use livecode everyday. We're using livecode for our internal tools and to develop tools for our customers. Livecode is very powerful, but it is not very "popular" between coders and developers. If you are waiting to get a job like "livecode programer" on a big com

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-25 Thread Matt Maier
Yeah, nobody I talk to or read has ever heard of Livecode. One of the larger freelance developer recruiting websites doesn't even bother to ask anyone if they know Livecode, and I half suspect they had to google it before they answered my question. I'm not really looking forward to having to get d

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-25 Thread Richard Gaskin
Richmond wrote: > On 25.08.2016 22:21, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> Richmond wrote: >> >> > Livecode is so not here it makes me howl: >> > >> > https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-1 >> > https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-2 >> > https://elearningindustry

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-25 Thread Richmond
No my howl was because I shouldn't hgave to add LC: it should be one of the automatic authoring tools of choice. R. On 25.08.2016 22:21, Richard Gaskin wrote: Richmond wrote: > Livecode is so not here it makes me howl: > > https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-1 > https:/

Re: Missing a chance

2016-08-25 Thread Richard Gaskin
Richmond wrote: > Livecode is so not here it makes me howl: > > https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-1 > https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-2 > https://elearningindustry.com/37-authoring-tools Yes, there are many thousands of tools lists across the w

Missing a chance

2016-08-25 Thread Richmond
Livecode is so not here it makes me howl: https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-1 https://elearningindustry.com/list-of-authoring-tools-part-2 https://elearningindustry.com/37-authoring-tools Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing lis