Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-19 Thread Richard Gaskin
Apparently Kevin sent an email to one of the members of the Dev list clarifying the server changes - I trust he won't mind my taking the liberty of posting that here since it provides some very helpful info for those concerned about what had appeared to be the new policies for On-Rev: Th

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread stephen barncard
If there were shell access and root, we could install our own version of PostGRE. The disk space limit is insulting at the current pricing and an idea from another decade. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Robert Sneidar wrote: > I just sent an email. A polite one too, not a flamer. How many of

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Sneidar
I just sent an email. A polite one too, not a flamer. How many of you thought me capable of civility? ;-) I don't care about the PostGRE, although I understand some others might be who used it. The disk space will not affect me now, but may in the future, so I voiced my reserved objections. B

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread Robert Sneidar
Thank God I didn't decide to use PostGRE for any apps! Bob On Jan 18, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Rick Harrison wrote: > Hey guys, > > Did you notice that on-rev is no longer going to support > PostgreSQL databases anymore? > > All of my developmental work is being done with > PostgreSQL databases! >

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread Monte Goulding
On 19/01/2013, at 8:11 AM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote: > On 1/18/13 3:06 PM, stephen barncard wrote: >> I just got the notice, by email, a few hours ago. This is official. > > Right, I've seen it now. The email says to contact RR if there are concerns. > They don't read this list, so I hope people

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/18/13 3:06 PM, stephen barncard wrote: I just got the notice, by email, a few hours ago. This is official. Right, I've seen it now. The email says to contact RR if there are concerns. They don't read this list, so I hope people do that. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyp

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread stephen barncard
I just got the notice, by email, a few hours ago. This is official. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:37 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Howard, RR has always honored their contracts. I haven't seen any > information about new changes. In the past, anything that affected existing > users generated an email

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread J. Landman Gay
Howard, RR has always honored their contracts. I haven't seen any information about new changes. In the past, anything that affected existing users generated an email notification. Where would I go to see the info? Or did I miss an email? On 1/18/13 2:23 PM, Howard Bornstein wrote: This is v

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread Howard Bornstein
This is very distressing to me. I purchased a Founder's account when they were just starting and we had a *contract* that specified 100 GB storage for life. This action is exactly like AT&T offering "unlimited" data to its early iPhone users and then later deciding that they had changed the definit

Re: No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread stephen barncard
They are also cutting disk allowance in half to 50 gigs, when other providers (like Dreamhost) don't set such limits. No mention of root access. That's it for me, outa here. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Rick Harrison wrote: > Hey guys, > > Did you notice that on-rev is no longer going to sup

No More PostgreSQL on On-Rev anymore!

2013-01-18 Thread Rick Harrison
Hey guys, Did you notice that on-rev is no longer going to support PostgreSQL databases anymore? All of my developmental work is being done with PostgreSQL databases! I think that is outrageous! Anyone else upset by this change? If so we'd all like to here from you now. Thanks, Rick __