What Richard said!
However, it's ironic that I became aware of Livecode through one of these
blacklistsing incidents. I was a memebre of a forum for one of the
blacklisting sites and Heather put a post on there becaue the RunRev
serevers were blacklisted there too. We exchanged emails about the
On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Blocking entire IP ranges is not a responsible way to blacklist, since it can
> - an inevitably does - affect legitimate users. It's simply lazy, a
> ham-fisted scorched-earth way to solve a problem that requires more surgical
> methods.
>
>
Tim Jones wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> I've had domains caught up with sloppy blacklisting schemes myself.
>>
>> It's not a problem with RunRev, or their host, but with the lazy
>> nature of a few blacklisting systems.
>
> Actually, in this case, it is their hos
On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> I've had domains caught up with sloppy blacklisting schemes myself.
>
> It's not a problem with RunRev, or their host, but with the lazy nature of a
> few blacklisting systems.
Actually, in this case, it is their host. GoDaddy needs to tighte
Pete wrote:
I got caught in this web a couple of years back (I think it was with
GoDaddy). Here's the problem I have with the blacklist sites. Their
blanket blackballing of servers means that the 99% of users who are using
it for genuine, non-spam emails get dumped on for the sins of the 1%.
P
Tim Jones writes:
> It appears that OnRev uses GoDaddy services as the "secureserver.net" servers
belong to them. Because of
> GoDaddy's "easy" online setup, spammers / scammers are able to pop in, perform
a hit-and-run with their
> mail broadcast, and the security team doesn't catch it and disa
I got caught in this web a couple of years back (I think it was with
GoDaddy). Here's the problem I have with the blacklist sites. Their
blanket blackballing of servers means that the 99% of users who are using
it for genuine, non-spam emails get dumped on for the sins of the 1%.
Personally, I s
Nice to know Tim good catch!
Bob
On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Tim Jones wrote:
> It appears that OnRev uses GoDaddy services as the "secureserver.net" servers
> belong to them. Because of GoDaddy's "easy" online setup, spammers /
> scammers are able to pop in, perform a hit-and-run with thei
It appears that OnRev uses GoDaddy services as the "secureserver.net" servers
belong to them. Because of GoDaddy's "easy" online setup, spammers / scammers
are able to pop in, perform a hit-and-run with their mail broadcast, and the
security team doesn't catch it and disable the account into it
Hi Bob,
Am 02.04.2012 um 19:02 schrieb Bob Sneidar:
> Do you have your own domain set up with on-rev?
Yep.
> If so, then you need to contact the blacklist organizations and find out what
> the gripe was. Then you can contact them via a form they have and request
> that you be removed, but if
Do you have your own domain set up with on-rev? If so, then you need to contact
the blacklist organizations and find out what the gripe was. Then you can
contact them via a form they have and request that you be removed, but if the
problem still persists, the problem will recur.
Are you sendin
Klaus-
Monday, April 2, 2012, 8:22:44 AM, you wrote:
> My web and email hoster is RunRev (on-rev).
> So my hoster has a bad reputation?
> If yes, how come? What can I do?
> Can anyone tell me who is to blame here, I plea not guilty!? :-D
I no longer use the on-rev smtp server because of this
Hi friends,
in the last weeks some of my mails bounced back from different email addresses
due to the sending MTA's poor reputation?
...
This message was crea
13 matches
Mail list logo
