Re: On Performance of Array Access

jbv wrote: > Once something "suitable for including in a 9.0.x maintenance release" > is available, could you please include it to LC server, and especially > the version of LC9 server installed on on-rev sage server ? Here's a potentially quick CPU and RAM reduction opportunity for LC Server: h

Re: On Performance of Array Access

Great work Mark! ...great news! On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:41 PM Mark Talluto via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I have only one complaint…You should have told me to put a diaper on > before reading this. Aside from my inability to control myself with all > this wonderful n

Re: On Performance of Array Access

I have only one complaint…You should have told me to put a diaper on before reading this. Aside from my inability to control myself with all this wonderful news…Thank you! Best regards, Mark Talluto livecloud.io nursenotes.net canelasoftware.com <

Re: On Performance of Array Access

Mark, Thank you so much for following up on this thread. Once something "suitable for including in a 9.0.x maintenance release" is available, could you please include it to LC server, and especially the version of LC9 server installed on on-rev sage server ? I'm in the process of improving for a

Re: On Performance of Array Access

Mark W: > 6.7.11: 1117ms > 9.0.1: 4020ms > PR6671: 1017ms Now THAT'S the kind of news that makes a Friday special! Honestly I was quite disappointed lately in 9's array speed, but this gives me a lot of hope, and it also helps in the practical details of code planning for projects. Thank y

Re: On Performance of Array Access

Impressive. Thank you. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Mark Waddingham wrote: Generally, I don't tend to like to 'jump the gun' on anything related to optimization lest it is not what it seems when running in the real world but... I'm becoming increasingly confident that a recent fo

Re: On Performance of Array Access

Cool. I subscribed to the PR :) I’ll need to run this on the array stress test I did last week. Thanks, Brian On Aug 31, 2018, 8:58 AM -0500, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode , wrote: > Generally, I don't tend to like to 'jump the gun' on anything related to > optimization lest it is not what it

On Performance of Array Access

Generally, I don't tend to like to 'jump the gun' on anything related to optimization lest it is not what it seems when running in the real world but... I'm becoming increasingly confident that a recent foray of mine into yet another attempt to improve the speed of array access in LC9 might ha