I see I'm behind the curve again, should have read the rest of the thread
before posting...
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
On 2/25/11, Peter Brigham wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/12 1:55 PM, Dar Scott wrot
On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 2/24/12 1:55 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
>
>> I suspect we are all doing this the wrong way. Maybe there are
>> debugging features or compiler optimizations that allow for better
>> ways to do this.
>
> I've started doing it the way someone else
Reminds of the labelling on fireworks back in the UK "Light the blue touch
paper and retire". Maybe that's a good one for the English like
programming language disvussion.
Pete
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Dar-
>
> Friday, February 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM, you wrote:
>
>
Dar-
Friday, February 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM, you wrote:
> (Oh, by the way, Mark, this old teletype programmer can never
> bring himself to use CR for the LiveCode newline.)
Yeah, I mentally translate CR and LF to CRLF all the time. And I can't
handle "return" as a synonym. "put tText & return" m
Bob-
Friday, February 24, 2012, 1:24:26 PM, you wrote:
> Yup! It's open sourced (Thank you very much Jerry and Trevor!)
> and Mark Weider just updated it recently.
...and (sigh) just updated again to 1.0.13 to further hack around the
menubar problem.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
As long as we are sharing debugging techniques, let me share what I am doing
for IOS development. I created a launcher app that has a Global LogData
buffer. The launcher app has a display window and 3 buttons. One button
goes to a file in my dropbox that contains a list of URLs to the othe
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Andre-
>
> Friday, February 24, 2012, 2:22:47 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Then you have added benefits...
>
> Also note that as of rev 2.9 "put" statments to the message box can be
> redirected to a file. I forget the details off the top of my head,
Andre-
Friday, February 24, 2012, 2:22:47 PM, you wrote:
> Then you have added benefits...
Also note that as of rev 2.9 "put" statments to the message box can be
redirected to a file. I forget the details off the top of my head, but
I think it's in the 2.9 release notes.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:41 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 2/24/12 3:39 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
>
>> That may have been I who mentioned log.
>>
>
> I'm sure it must have been, you have lots of little tricks like that. I
> just couldn't remember for sure.
>
> I've used Andre's method too, where you t
On 2/24/12 3:39 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
That may have been I who mentioned log.
I'm sure it must have been, you have lots of little tricks like that. I
just couldn't remember for sure.
I've used Andre's method too, where you toggle a constant, but I didn't
post it because, like you, I couldn't
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
> Is there any advantage of using a debug constant over commenting out the
> body of the log?
no advantage at all... actually, the commented version will run faster
because it does not execute the if statement to check for constant value.
The th
Is there any advantage of using a debug constant over commenting out the body
of the log?
And, to add to the confusion of output possibilities, if I want to minimize the
time impact or have other constraints, I log to a variable and then do
something with the variable.
Dar
On Feb 24, 2012,
Jacque,
I use something like
constant kDebug = true
on log pText
if kDebug is true then
put pText
end if
end log
The good thing is that if I want to change from debug to release, I just
change the kDebug constant value and the puts are gone.
Cheers
andre
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:58
That may have been I who mentioned log. Don't forget the newline or tab in the
log handler. The method also allows adding timestamps or delta seconds.
Though I said "log", I actually tend to use the word log for more permanent
logging. The three letters can't be beat for shortness, though.
Yup! It's open sourced (Thank you very much Jerry and Trevor!) and Mark Weider
just updated it recently.
Bob
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Dar Scott wrote:
> Is GLX2 still available?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Plea
Um... erm... yes well harumph why I DID know that.
Bob
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> And... er... you *are* aware that glx2 already has this in the "Go" menu,
> right?
>
> --
> Mark Wieder
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-li
: Re: Stray Puts
On 2/24/12 1:55 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
> I suspect we are all doing this the wrong way. Maybe there are
> debugging features or compiler optimizations that allow for better
> ways to do this.
I've started doing it the way someone else suggested. I use a handler:
on
On 2/24/12 1:55 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
I suspect we are all doing this the wrong way. Maybe there are
debugging features or compiler optimizations that allow for better
ways to do this.
I've started doing it the way someone else suggested. I use a handler:
on log pMsg
put pMsg
end log
Then i
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
>
> Is GLX2 still available?
https://bitbucket.org/mwieder/glx2/
Courtesy of Jerry and Mark =)
--
http://www.andregarzia.com -- All We Do Is Code.
http://fon.nu -- minimalist url shortening service.
_
I couldn't figure that one out for a Remo plugin I asked Jerry and he
never responded. Thanks Bob!
sqb
On 24 February 2012 11:27, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Bob Sneidar writes:
>
> >
> > Anyone ever scripted a put to put something in the message box, and then
> forgot it was there and had a
> >
Good idea, Mark. But... Then you have to put 'put empty' at the top of the
section tested. Easy to search for, though. Or clear the message box by hand.
It would be nice to have a clear button on the message box. And a scroll bar.
That way to you can accumulate several runs. You can put
Bob Sneidar writes:
>
> Anyone ever scripted a put to put something in the message box, and then
forgot it was there and had a
> helluvatime finding it again?
Nice, but no, a while back I stopped putting "put" statements in and replaced
them with
put xyzzy & cr after msg
that way I just have
In a word - YES. I'll give this a try - thanks ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:49, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Anyone ever scripted a put to put something in the message box, and then
> forgot it was there and had a helluvatime finding it again? I give you:
>
> function findPut theScri
I've gotten in the habit of doing this:
--TEST:
put blah blah blah
Then I can just do a search for "--TEST" and find the "put" and delete
it. Not very high-tech, but it works for me.
Marty K
Anyone ever scripted a put to put something in the message box, and then forgot
it was there and had
Cool! What about 'put something after message'?
I sometimes make a long comment like '-- -
!' after such lines. Sometimes, I make a command to log values
that can be changed to output to the message box, stdout, the console, a file
or a field and then c
Bob,
I think that Chipp had an altPlugin that would look everywhere on a stack
and find those puts...
=)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Anyone ever scripted a put to put something in the message box, and then
> forgot it was there and had a helluvatime finding it again?
26 matches
Mail list logo
