On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Richmond wrote:
> Does that make me a home-brewer?
Bah.
Soak some malted barley in hot water, rinse with hotter water, boil
the rinse with female hop flowers, cool down,and add yeast.
*Then* you will be a home brewer . . .
:)
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702
Reminds me of Madagascar 2. "All hail the New York Giants!"
On Oct 3, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Tim-
>
> Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 9:20:58 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Is LC the preferred tool for non-pros developing for their own use? If not
>> then what is?
>
> Asking that on the LC l
Tim-
Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 9:20:58 AM, you wrote:
> Is LC the preferred tool for non-pros developing for their own use? If not
> then what is?
Asking that on the LC list is like asking Giants fans who their
favorite team is.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
On 10/03/2012 07:20 PM, Timothy Miller wrote:
On Oct 2, 2012, at 1:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I just meant that anyone developing cross platform apps (Windows, OS X, mobile)
couldn't use the same code base for all builds. The menu is strictly an OS X
service, so there would have to be a lot
This is my classification as well. Though with the use of tablets
really gaining traction in the company, it is may become
important to have a tool I can use on desktop as well as mobile.
Tim Selander
On 10/4/12 1:42 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
You would need to make the distinction about develop
I think LC is a PERFECT tool for developing in house and being a
"home-brewer." What is even better is when you decided to go
commercial and go big because you have developed an amazing product,
you are still using the same tool to do it!
SKIP
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
You would need to make the distinction about developing in house. I am strictly
an in house developer, although some of what I do or plan to do might find it's
way into a commercial app eventually. Would I be considered a home-brewer or a
pro? I am certainly still an amateur!
Bob
On Oct 3, 2
