Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread Matt Maier
Wasn't planning to make a habit out of this, but here's another one. Unles "variabable" was a punny easter egg. Maybe some kind of Freudian slip. http://samples.on-rev.com/get.irev "...added with the following syntax: http://www.yoururl.com?variabableName1=value&...; I'll stop if someone can

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread [-hh]
Hi Klus and Dr.Hwkins, sorry, searched without "a". But off topic is off topic, so I'll insist on that: Matt writes: '.. this sentence shouldn't have an "a" in it.' And this sentence(*) has two "a" in it. He could have written '.. this sentence shouldn't have an "a " in it.' Else we have two

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:00 AM, [-hh] wrote: > [2] The sentence you cite is not there. > https://livecode.com/services/ > > Were it Ireland instead of Scotland, I'd suggest the wee folk had taken care of it . . . -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread Klaus major-k
Hi Hermann, > Am 30.07.2016 um 17:00 schrieb [-hh] : > > [1] As to the sentence you cite: > Why should have "your team" no "a"? > Or: What means "your tem?" there is an "a" too much right after "hire": >> ...to help you hire a the right new LiveCode developer... > [2]

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread [-hh]
[1] As to the sentence you cite: Why should have "your team" no "a"? Or: What means "your tem?" [2] The sentence you cite is not there. https://livecode.com/services/ Matt Maier wrote > It's off topic, but in the spirit of wanting Livecode to be as good as it > can be, this sentence shouldn't

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Peter Bogdanoff wrote: > It's Scots. Or maybe Scotch. For that matter, it could have been caused by bourbon to tequila . . . :) -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 ___ use-livecode

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread Peter Bogdanoff
It's Scots. Or maybe Scotch. > On Jul 30, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Richmond wrote: > > Well, I would also take issue with 'onto' and replace it with 'for'. > > Richmond. > > >> On 30.07.2016 16:22, Matt Maier wrote: >> It's off topic, but in the spirit of wanting

Re: typo

2016-07-30 Thread Richmond
Well, I would also take issue with 'onto' and replace it with 'for'. Richmond. On 30.07.2016 16:22, Matt Maier wrote: It's off topic, but in the spirit of wanting Livecode to be as good as it can be, this sentence shouldn't have an "a" in it. https://livecode.com/services/ "Let us run the