Re: Reverting to 5.0.2

2012-03-23 Thread Ray Horsley
Many thanks guys! On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote: > Hi, > > You're right. 2.7 is the format used since 2.7 (which was finally released as > 3.0 IIRC) and now the new format is 5.5. Before 2.7 it was 2.4. I don't > remember being unable to open a 2.4 stack with any version

Re: Reverting to 5.0.2

2012-03-23 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi, You're right. 2.7 is the format used since 2.7 (which was finally released as 3.0 IIRC) and now the new format is 5.5. Before 2.7 it was 2.4. I don't remember being unable to open a 2.4 stack with any version between 2.0 and 2.4. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting

Re: Reverting to 5.0.2

2012-03-23 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 3/23/12 3:27 PM, Ray Horsley wrote: I've saved a stack in 5.5 but now I'd like to open it in 5.0.2 which doesn't recognize it as a stack. I can open it in 5.5 and save it in legacy but that takes me all the way back to 2.7 with an unknown number of feature losses. Any suggestions? Version

Re: Reverting to 5.0.2

2012-03-23 Thread Michael Doub
It would be helpful if there is a mapping between stack file revisions (2.7.2.4, current) and the live code revisions. Is this documented anywhere? What is the stack revision number for 5.5? In Ray's case, I think that 2.7 is the format used by 5.0.2. Please correct me if I am mistaken -=

Reverting to 5.0.2

2012-03-23 Thread Ray Horsley
I've saved a stack in 5.5 but now I'd like to open it in 5.0.2 which doesn't recognize it as a stack. I can open it in 5.5 and save it in legacy but that takes me all the way back to 2.7 with an unknown number of feature losses. Any suggestions? Thanks, Ray Horsley LinkIt! Software _