Wold it be possible or even practical to use the atom editor passing info
back and forth to LC thus separating LC from the editor so only one instance
of the engine is required to be running ?
No idea how to do this, just throwing it in for discussion.
-
Andy Piddock
My software never h
Malte Brill wrote:
> Ali Lloyd wrote:
>
>> I don't think that the current script editor should be neglected
>
> I think that depends on when 7 will be EOLed. If you plan to have 8
> stable by the end of the year and you plan to have a new Script
> editor there, wasting resources might be indeed a
Ali Lloyd wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 16:49, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> With the IDE things are even better: it's already written in a
>> high-level scripting language. Why not use LiveCode Script?
>>
>> If we can't build a good text editor in LiveCode, what are any of us
>> doing here?
>
>
Ali Lloyd wrote:
> I don't think that the current script editor should be neglected
I think that depends on when 7 will be EOLed. If you plan to have 8 stable by
the end of the year and you plan to have a new Script editor there, wasting
resources might be indeed a waste.
Mike Kerner wrote:
>
There are SO MANY things that can, and, in my opinion, should happen with
a/the script editor, that I often wonder if instead of working on one,
effort should instead be spent on a BBEdit/TextWrangler plugin or some
method for leveraging someone else's text editor.
Bootstrapping is an unbelievably
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 16:49, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> With the IDE things are even better: it's already written in a
> high-level scripting language. Why not use LiveCode Script?
>
> If we can't build a good text editor in LiveCode, what are any of us
> doing here?
>
>
That is a false dichotom
