Enhancement request for "Circle Avatar" widget.

Hi friends, see subject, I just created an enhencement request for a round border around (sic! :-) the image inside of the widget, that would really make sense. Not a border of the surrounding rect. Best Klaus -- Klaus Major https://www.maj

Re: Possible enhancement request

On 11/2/2023 11:20 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi friends, before I post an enhancment request to the "Qualtiy Center", I wanted to hear your opinions about this. Wouldn't it be great if ALL widgets would receive and handle at least a mouseup (and mousedown) meassage? I have alw

Re: Possible enhancement request

Hi all, I filed an enhancement request for this with some more examples: <https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=24429> Best Klaus > Am 02.11.2023 um 17:01 schrieb J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > : > > +... > > I can never keep all those variations str

Re: Possible enhancement request

+... I can never keep all those variations straight. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On November 2, 2023 10:21:29 AM Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi friends, before I post an enhancment request to the "Qua

Re: Possible enhancement request

for good or bad, the lcb style guide section on events as excerpted, here says that those events are recommended, but not required. in many of those widgets, it would also be nice if there was a way to interce

Possible enhancement request

Hi friends, before I post an enhancment request to the "Qualtiy Center", I wanted to hear your opinions about this. Wouldn't it be great if ALL widgets would receive and handle at least a mouseup (and mousedown) meassage? I have always wondered why that is not the case. This way scripting woul

Re: Enhancement request: show the execution contexts in debugger UI

ecode wrote: Hi Folks, I’ve just submit an enhancement request to add a pane to the script editor to show the execution contexts in the debugger UI. I hope others feel like this is a good enhancement and will join in to support it. https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23175 &

Re: Enhancement request: show the execution contexts in debugger UI

:46, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: Hi Folks, I’ve just submit an enhancement request to add a pane to the script editor to show the execution contexts in the debugger UI. I hope others feel like this is a good enhancement and will join in to support it. https://quality.livecode.com/show_

Enhancement request: show the execution contexts in debugger UI

Hi Folks, I’ve just submit an enhancement request to add a pane to the script editor to show the execution contexts in the debugger UI. I hope others feel like this is a good enhancement and will join in to support it. https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23175 <ht

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

Dan Brown wrote: > The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time > business in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership > with one of the top existing aggregators and creating a widget to > display the ads I could see being a winner. > > For apps made in lc communit

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Dan Brown via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business > in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top > existing aggregators and creating a widge

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

That would work for me. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2017, at 1:30 AM, Dan Brown via use-livecode > wrote: > > The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business > in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top > existing aggregators and

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top existing aggregators and creating a widget to display the ads I could see being a winner. For apps made in lc community they could take a percentage

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

When you sign up with an ad aggregator, a portion of the revenue goes to the aggregator. This would be no different. Basically, I am suggesting something like MobFox for LiveCode. Voluntary, of course. We need a realistic and practical as solution for ads. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 21, 201

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I was suggesting that perhaps providing a start to finish way for us to > have ads in the apps we make could provide extra income to RunRev - more > than the cost of hiring extra staff to m

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

I did not mean inside the IDE. I was suggesting that perhaps providing a start to finish way for us to have ads in the apps we make could provide extra income to RunRev - more than the cost of hiring extra staff to make that happen. I don't want to sound like I know what is best for them - I do

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

No he said apps MADE in Livecode. But I think it's a bad idea for RunRev (livecode whatever) to get sidetracked. I really like the progress they are making with new features and bug fixes. I want this long train to keep on moving. After all, without love, where would you be right now? (hmmm... t

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I > suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds > for apps made with LC. It could be a source of

Re: I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

Ouch. On 7/21/17 11:58 pm, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode wrote: My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds for apps made with LC. It could be a source of revenue for the company and for developer

I just added an enhancement request - 20138 - suggestion for in-app ads

My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds for apps made with LC. It could be a source of revenue for the company and for developers, and it could attract more developers looking for easy solutions t

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

Oh, I definitely claim the typos :-) Yes, it's line-for-line identical to one or two versions before the last one I released. The later version added a few declarations to make it 'explicitVariable' friendly (much needed for me - see "typo" above :-), and a few changes of 'char' to 'byte' -

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

On 7/9/17 3:36 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: s/snack/stack/ sheesh Actually, I've written scripts that eat stacks. I've written scripts that eat whole computers. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hypera

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

Hm. Do you know any angry angels? On 7/9/17 2:24 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: Fascinating. That's the code I wrote and released 10 years ago, and now it's found its way onto github without my help. -- Alex. On 09/07/2017 16:27, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: There's

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

s/snack/stack/ sheesh -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

On 07/09/2017 12:24 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: Fascinating. That's the code I wrote and released 10 years ago, and now it's found its way onto github without my help. But the fact that it's a script-only snack is rather nice. I made a few tweaks to bring it up to date and issued

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

Fascinating. That's the code I wrote and released 10 years ago, and now it's found its way onto github without my help. -- Alex. On 09/07/2017 16:27, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: There's a livecodescript library which manipulates exif data: https://github.com/angerangel/livecode

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

On 07/09/2017 10:39 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: It is GPLv2 or later *or* undisclosed commercial license. So not generally usable except for in pure GPLv3 LiveCode projects (unless you buy a commercial license for it for your specific use). Urk! Dang lawyers. -- Mark Wieder

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

It is GPLv2 or later *or* undisclosed commercial license. So not generally usable except for in pure GPLv3 LiveCode projects (unless you buy a commercial license for it for your specific use). Mark Sent from my iPhone > On 9 Jul 2017, at 16:19, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > >> On

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

There's a livecodescript library which manipulates exif data: https://github.com/angerangel/livecodeExif Warmest Regards, Mark. Sent from my iPhone > On 9 Jul 2017, at 09:51, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode > wrote: > > Currently LiveCode only accesses the density of an image from its m

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

On 07/09/2017 04:22 AM, JB via use-livecode wrote: I did a web search and found this info. Exiv2 is a C++ library and a command line utility to manage image metadata. It provides fast and easy read and write access to the Exif, IPTC and XMP metadata of images in various formats. Exiv2 is avail

Re: Image Metadata Enhancement Request

I did a web search and found this info. Exiv2 is a C++ library and a command line utility to manage image metadata. It provides fast and easy read and write access to the Exif, IPTC and XMP metadata of images in various formats. Exiv2 is available as free software and with a commercial license,

Image Metadata Enhancement Request

Currently LiveCode only accesses the density of an image from its metadata. It would be very usefil indeed if it could access all of an image's metadata. BUG 20025 Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit th

Re: enhancement request

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > I rely on exact pasting positions when duplicating a card object to a > different card or across stacks. LC's "duplicate" menu item does offset the > duplicates. And thanks Jacque,. I knew about that but had forgotten about it. When try

Re: enhancement request

Thanks Jerry, didn't know about that, very useful Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Jerry Jensen wrote: > If you use Option-drag to

Re: enhancement request

I actually use naming to discern which fields display input from a SQL database. Every field that begins with “fld” is associated with a column in a table i.e. fldCustomerName is associated with the column customername. Bob S On Oct 14, 2014, at 14:15 , J. Landman Gay wrote: > Agree, I thin

Re: enhancement request

Either the option key is stuck, or else the engine thinks it’s down. Sounds like you are cloning the second copy. Bob S On Oct 14, 2014, at 13:16 , la...@significantplanet.org wrote: > Hello, > I've had this situation before and had it again today, which cost me a couple > of hours. > > I d

Re: enhancement request

On 10/14/2014, 5:26 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: Going back to the original problem, it might be useful to offset a pasted control by a few pixels to the right and lower to make it more obvious it's there. Or just keep the app browser or the project browser open, where it would be easy to spot.

Re: enhancement request

And now I remember how I got into the same predicament a long time ago: I option-dragged and then thought "oops, I didn't want to do that" and tried to undo my action by carefully putting the new one exactly over the original. WRONG MOVE JENSEN! On Oct 14, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Jerry Jensen wrote:

Re: enhancement request

That is an excellent idea and would solve the problem for him. It is nice to visually see something has changed. Sometimes your keyboard does not catch the paste command and then when you drag the supposed pasted field to a new location you mess up the location of the original field. John Balgen

Re: enhancement request

If you use Option-drag to make a copy, you can for sure see that there are two. .Jerry On Oct 14, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Going back to the original problem, it might be useful to offset a pasted > control by a few pixels to the right and lower to make it more obvious it's > the

Re: enhancement request

Going back to the original problem, it might be useful to offset a pasted control by a few pixels to the right and lower to make it more obvious it's there. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin

Re: enhancement request

I like to reference my fields and buttons by id number and then I don’t need to worry about it. John Balgenorth On Oct 14, 2014, at 2:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Agree, I think the feature is more desirable than not. I frequently name all > label fields the same so I can loop over all the

Re: enhancement request

Agree, I think the feature is more desirable than not. I frequently name all label fields the same so I can loop over all the controls and skip any named "lbl". On October 14, 2014 4:05:49 PM CDT, dunb...@aol.com wrote: >As for a warning that you already have one of that name, there are >insta

Re: enhancement request

dy have one of that name, there are instances where that sort of naming is desired, and we would then have others writing for an enhancement that eliminated that annoying warning. I say, "Live it, or live with it" Craig -Original Message- From: larry To: use-livecode Sent: T

enhancement request

Hello, I've had this situation before and had it again today, which cost me a couple of hours. I dragged a new scrolling field onto my stack and named it "myInput". I hit Ctrl C and Ctrl V to copy it. I dragged the new field to a new position and named it "myOutput". Somehow (I'm not sure ho

Re: [Enhancement Request] Support of webM and webP

lity Center. :D http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12448 Al -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Enhancement-Request-Support-of-webM-and-webP-tp4679750p4679753.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archiv

Re: [Enhancement Request] Support of webM and webP

thinking of? Dar On May 19, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote: > Just posted this enhancement request: > http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12448 > > Although I have posted this request in LiveCode's mail-list, > the Quality Center is the place to discus

[Enhancement Request] Support of webM and webP

Just posted this enhancement request: http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12448 Although I have posted this request in LiveCode's mail-list, the Quality Center is the place to discuss it. Could you include in LiveCode, support for these modern and updated video, audio and anim

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On 24/04/2014 23:15, Richard Gaskin wrote: Ben Rubinstein wrote: > I'd love to know: what do other people do to customise their > environment? Is that all?!? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-liv

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Ben Rubinstein wrote: > > It's got various things on it, but the main ones are a big backup+save > button, and a display of the rev version - actually, the buildnumber(), > version() and revAppVersion() - so just by glancing at the top-right corner > of my screen

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

It is interesting how different people work in different ways. In my lcStackBrowser plugin I tried to include functionality that I've found useful in my own work environment and also keep the number of open utility stacks to a minimum, hoping to provide as much flexibility as possible. Like Richar

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

J. Landman Gay wrote: On 4/24/14, 5:15 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Where do you put the stacks you're working on? :) You and I have exactly opposite work habits. Maybe not so much. Most of those stacks aren't open all the time, some seldom

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On 4/24/14, 5:15 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Where do you put the stacks you're working on? :) You and I have exactly opposite work habits. I mentioned "choice" earlier in this thread. Choice is good. It's a credit to LC that we can work howev

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

Ben Rubinstein wrote: > I'd love to know: what do other people do to customise their > environment? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveC

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On 4/24/14, 1:56 PM, Ben Rubinstein wrote: I'd love to know: what do other people do to customise their environment? I use a system I started in HC 25+ years ago and have been adding to ever since. Back then it was additions to the Home script, today it's a library plugin that inserts one scr

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:13 PM To: How to use LiveCode Subject: Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC I got tired of that so now I just type "the version"

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On 24/04/14 00:26, Alejandro Tejada wrote: Hi Richmond, Richmond Mathewson-2 wrote How about something like this: on saveStackRequest put (the short name of this stack & the version) into NOM put NOM into fld "NOM" set the name of this stack to NOM pass saveStackRequest en

RE: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

rev.com] On >Behalf >Of J. Landman Gay >Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:13 PM >To: How to use LiveCode >Subject: Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and >RC > >I got tired of that so now I just type "the version" into the message >box. &g

RE: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

ssage- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:13 PM To: How to use LiveCode Subject: Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC I got tired of that so now I just type "the version

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

With a file-format change happening, and two fronts of development, this is even more important. Maybe the mouse pointer can be red for dp and orange for rc. Or it can speak “seven point zero” whenever I bring a window forward. Or a way to make version icons for aliases. Dar On Apr 23, 20

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

I got tired of that so now I just type "the version" into the message box. On April 23, 2014 8:20:56 PM CDT, Kay C Lan wrote: >The problem I have is I occasionally accidentally start the wrong version >so I'm constantly needing to visit the About LiveCode to confirm which version >is open --

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Stacks can be opened many ways. > I'm with Richard on this one. I have stacks I wont risk with anything other than GM versions of LC. Those stacks I am willing to risk I simply duplicate then start them up with an RC or DP version. The pro

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

t; end saveStackRequest > > Certainly works for me. Where do you put this handler? In a frontscript or replacing the IDE original handler? Al -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Enhancement-Request-Open-and-BackUp-in-LiveCode-DP-and-RC-tp4

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On 23/04/14 23:04, Alejandro Tejada wrote: Then, a plug-in stack would do. Does LiveCode includes the Engine version in each saved stack? http://docs.runrev.com/Function/version http://docs.runrev.com/Property/stackFileVersion If this is true, then LiveCode could provide a warning when develop

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

On 23/04/14 22:22, Alejandro Tejada wrote: Hi All, Just added this enhancement request: http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12279 Every announcement of a new LiveCode version includes this message: WARNING: this is not a stable release. Please ensure you back up your stacks before

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

engine version and offers to create a backup. Just a thought... Al -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Enhancement-Request-Open-and-BackUp-in-LiveCode-DP-and-RC-tp4678587p4678592.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

Stacks can be opened many ways. In most of my projects I only manually open one stack in the IDE, and the scripts in that stack may load as many as a dozen others. To satisfy the request the engine would have to intercept all attempts to open stacks, or maybe just the save command, and then i

[Enhancement Request] Open and BackUp in LiveCode DP and RC

Hi All, Just added this enhancement request: http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12279 Every announcement of a new LiveCode version includes this message: WARNING: this is not a stable release. Please ensure you back up your stacks before testing them. RunRev could add the following

[ENHANCEMENT REQUEST] LiveCode Server needs a way to disable SSL verification check

Hey Folks, Sometimes you need to use a self-signed certificate with a server that you want to access with LiveCode. When using LiveCode with Desktop Apps, you can issue libURLSetSSLVerification false and be happy but if you're using LiveCode server, then you're lost because there is no way to disa