Colin-
Friday, April 12, 2013, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
Please do comment on the right tools to do C++ coding on Linux,
and contributing to the community version of LiveCode.
May I direct your attention to:
http://forums.runrev.com/viewforum.php?f=66
I'm currently using gcc 4.7.2 on my 64-bit
On 04/13/2013 12:12 AM, Roger Eller wrote:
A 64-bit version was listed in the kickstarter stretch goals. Maybe that
was in the back of your mind when you downloaded it.
But stretch is as stretch does, and looking at RunRev's list of goals
they will be, indeed, stretched
to provide a 64 bit
On 04/13/2013 01:59 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Colin Holgate wrote:
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted.
I found these instructions somewhere:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get
Yes, I had the choice of logging in and using LiveCode, or not logging in and
not using LiveCode.
On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
That fixed things, LiveCode installed from the downloads folder just fine.
I did do the register stage, given there was
On 04/13/2013 07:48 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
Yes, I had the choice of logging in and using LiveCode, or not logging in and
not using LiveCode.
Very droll.
From a personal point of view I don't mind logging in and sending
whatever info to RunRev as
they know all about my warts already :)
Are any of you running Linux under Parallels? I need to write about the process
of pull the source code and building LiveCode, for Mac and Windows anyway, and
I may as well show what's involved in Linux.
Which Linux would be best for LiveCode, and for building LiveCode? Which
development
Colin,
About the VM part of your question, i use Virtual Box (FOSS version) and
prefers it to Parallels i used before. About the Linux part of your question,
Richard may give you a more actualized response than i my do ;-)
Best,
Le 12 avr. 2013 à 15:02, Colin Holgate a écrit :
Are any of
I already have Windows 8 running under Parallels, and it works extremely well.
I did try Virtual Box a while ago, but had some issues with it. It would just
be similar to add a new VM to Parallels.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Pierre Sahores s...@sahores-conseil.com wrote:
About the VM
.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/setting-up-Linux-for-LiveCode-and-other-dev-questions-tp4663254p4663264.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the suggestions. In the end though I'm downloading Ubuntu. Not so
much because it's the one I've heard people rave about the most, but because
there's huge download Ubuntu button inside Parallels! I figure that's going
to be easier than going with another variety.
Do you
On 04/12/2013 04:22 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I already have Windows 8 running under Parallels, and it works extremely well.
I did try Virtual Box a while ago, but had some issues with it. It would just
be similar to add a new VM to Parallels.
I use VMware and love it.
Richmond.
On Apr
The download and install of Ubuntu went really well. I downloaded the community
edition of LiveCode, a file named LiveCodeCommunityInstaller-6_0_0-Linux.x86.
That wanted me to select the application to use for opening it. I went into its
properties and checked the box that said allow to execute
I have been licensed for both programs, and have had spells where I used
Fusion. A while ago though Parallels overtook Fusion again, in particular to do
with hardware 3D, and so Parallels is better for the time being.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
I renamed the LiveCode installer to be .exe instead of .x86, and then when I
double clicked on it it revealed a set of files and folders. One of those is an
installer folder, but that only contains a png.
Still looking for help on how to run the installer on Linux!
On 04/12/2013 08:56 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I renamed the LiveCode installer to be .exe instead of .x86, and then when I
double clicked on it it revealed a set of files and folders. One of those is an
installer folder, but that only contains a png.
Still looking for help on how to run the
Which Linux? In Ubuntu, I always move it out of the downloads folder, then
right-click it, go to permissions, and make it executable. Then
double-click and install.
~Roger
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Colin Holgate co...@verizon.net wrote:
I renamed the LiveCode installer to be .exe
I had already set the permissions to be read write for everyone, moved it out
of the downloads folder, and set the executable box. None of those helped.
Here's one clue, if I do this:
ldd LiveCodeCommunityInstaller-6_0_0-Linux.x86
I get:
not a dynamic executable
If I then try:
readelf -l
On 04/12/2013 02:41 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I had already set the permissions to be read write for everyone, moved it out
of the downloads folder, and set the executable box. None of those helped.
Here's one clue, if I do this:
ldd LiveCodeCommunityInstaller-6_0_0-Linux.x86
I get:
not a
Colin, just a wild idea, try installing ia32-libs.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/setting-up-Linux-for-LiveCode-and-other-dev-questions-tp4663254p4663287.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted.
I found these instructions somewhere:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install ia32-libs
That fixed things, LiveCode installed from the
A 64-bit version was listed in the kickstarter stretch goals. Maybe that
was in the back of your mind when you downloaded it.
~Roger
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Colin Holgate co...@verizon.net wrote:
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically
On 4/12/13 3:02 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Colin, just a wild idea, try installing ia32-libs.
Oh that again. sigh
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Colin Holgate wrote:
Thanks. I'm not sure why I thought I was getting a 64 bit version. It
automatically gave me the one I thought I wanted.
I found these instructions somewhere:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install ia32-libs
That fixed things, LiveCode
On 13/04/2013, at 7:58 AM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Oh that again. sigh
Mark Wieder is working on compiling for 64 bit on Linux. Looks like he's
working on the IDE engine but I imagine if he gets that then server will come
quickly...
Cheers
--
Monte Goulding
M E R
On 4/12/13 6:17 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 13/04/2013, at 7:58 AM, J. Landman Gay
jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Oh that again. sigh
Mark Wieder is working on compiling for 64 bit on Linux. Looks like
he's working on the IDE engine but I imagine if he gets that then
server will come
Colin Holgate coiin@... writes:
How do you launch applications on Linux?
You need to set the executable bit.
Right-click on it
Go to Properties
Select the Permissions tab
Check Execute: Allow executing file as program
Close
Double-click
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
Please do comment on the right tools to do C++ coding on Linux, and
contributing to the community version of LiveCode.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Yeah, I just got home and I'm trigger-happy with the responses.
27 matches
Mail list logo
