[Use-revolution] Re: Revolution and XML

2001-11-29 Thread Ben Rubinstein
on 29/11/01 4:28 AM, Terry Judd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fine?? I don't doubt you can do it but I do question whether a generic > scripted solution is workable. Some Director dude that is more experienced > than I (and I'm no neophyte) has written a fairly robust xml parser in lingo > but giv

Re: [Use-revolution] Re: Revolution and XML

2001-11-29 Thread Ken Ray
Hey, Ben... can you post your code? It would be a great one to "optimize" on the list (just like we did with the "Constraining Movement" thread)... Just my $0.02, Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ - Original Message - From:

Re: adding objects to groups

2001-11-29 Thread Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
At 7:23 PM -0800 11/27/2001, Ben Rubinstein wrote: >on 28/11/01 2:27 AM, Ben Rubinstein at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >restored? Some clarification would be good - the documention gives >information about moving objects out of a group, but none that I could >detect for moving additional objects in.

checkbox state per card

2001-11-29 Thread Jamie
I'm making a simple database. It's cool that fields from a shared group can have different contents per card automatically. This is very helpful. Checkboxes from a shared group don't seem to have the same behavior. Setting such a checkbox on one card changes it on all cards. What is the simple

checkbox state per card

2001-11-29 Thread Jamie
I'm making a simple database. It's cool that fields from a shared group can have different contents per card automatically. This is very helpful. Checkboxes from a shared group don't seem to have the same behavior. Setting such a checkbox on one card changes it on all cards. What is the simple

[Use-revolution] Re: Revolution and XML

2001-11-29 Thread Terry Judd
>on 29/11/01 4:28 AM, Terry Judd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Fine?? I don't doubt you can do it but I do question whether a generic >> scripted solution is workable. Some Director dude that is more experienced >> than I (and I'm no neophyte) has written a fairly robust xml parser in lingo >>

Re: checkbox state per card

2001-11-29 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Jamie wrote: > What is the simplest way to make a checkboxe remember a separate > state for each card? If I understand your question, you simply set the sharedHilite property of each checkbox to false. Regards, Scott __

Re: checkbox state per card

2001-11-29 Thread Jamie
Thanks very much for the quick reply, Scott. OK, I see why I missed that, when I select any checkbox in the group, the "Share Hilite on Each Card" checkbox is ghosted on the Button page of the Properties window. How do I unghost the "Share Hilite..." checkbox so I can deselect it? Is there ano

Re: checkbox state per card

2001-11-29 Thread Jamie
OK, I was able to set the SharedHilite property to false from the message box. Not sure why the Properties window's GUI didn't allow that. Bug? Fixed in 1.1 (I'm using 1.0 for now)? Thanks again, Scott! -Jamie Jamie wrote: > > Thanks very much for the quick reply, Scott. > > OK, I see wh

Asterisk in window title

2001-11-29 Thread Ian Bridges
How do I remove the asterisk that appears after the window title in my stacks and standalones? eg My Stack* Ian B ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Re: Asterisk in window title

2001-11-29 Thread Troy Rollins
Ian Bridges wrote: > How do I remove the asterisk that appears after the window title in my > stacks and standalones? eg My Stack* Give the stack a label value in its properties palette. -- Troy RPSystems www.rpsystems.net ___ use-revolution mailing

Digest use-revolution.v001.n148

2001-11-29 Thread use-revolution-errors
-- BEGIN use-revolution.v001.n148 -- 001 - Kevin Miller Subject: Re: Lost Cursor changes Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:01:22 + MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 21/11/01