On Monday, Dec 30, 2002, at 15:28 Australia/Sydney, Matt Denton wrote:
Hello Dear List,
I'm just trying to Round off my year...
so pardon me if I'm w-ong but:
put round(-0.1)
Shouldn't that return 0 and not -0??
-0 is what? The smallest point ever imaginable beyond 0 in the negative
dir
Le dimanche, 29 déc 2002, à 21:57 US/Central, Howard Bornstein a écrit :
Is it possible to format button label text so that only a few letters
of the
label are underlined? It seems to be all or nothing, but I'd like to
be
able to have a standard button with a label like "black" with just
the
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 11:42 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
I then take the result and display it. The question I have is that
sometimes this call takes a very long time. (15-20 seconds).
I don't know what the delay could be. Maybe the DNS lookup for
www.apple.com?
We use a similar techni
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 08:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shell "ping -c 1 www.apple.com"
I then take the result and display it. The question I have is that
sometimes this call takes a very long time. (15-20 seconds).
I don't know what the delay could be. Maybe the DNS lookup fo
Hello Dear List,
I'm just trying to Round off my year...
so pardon me if I'm w-ong but:
put round(-0.1)
Shouldn't that return 0 and not -0??
-0 is what? The smallest point ever imaginable beyond 0 in the negative
direction?
Is this a bug or should I dig out my old school books? I imagi
>Is it possible to format button label text so that only a few letters of the
>label are underlined? It seems to be all or nothing, but I'd like to be
>able to have a standard button with a label like "black" with just the bl
>underlined.
I don't think it's possible using the textStyle property o
I've got a revolution app that does a simple
do field "runscript" as Applescript
and then that field has:
shell "ping -c 1 www.apple.com"
I then take the result and display it. The question I have is that sometimes this call takes a very long time. (15-20 seconds). Part of the reason I'm
Just so Rob.
I think of it as similar to the "interview" feature in programs such as
"Tax Cut", which is a perfect example of what I previously referred to
as a "data critical" situation.
Alan Gayne
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 06:10 PM, Rob Cozens wrote:
An off-the-wall thought:
Using
OCX and VCL are precursors to ActiveX on the Windows platform. They are
small libraries which provide extensibility to other programs. Probably what
he was referring to was whether Rev is extensible via custom C DLL's. Yes it
is, but one has to write the correct interfaces for it to work.
There is
An off-the-wall thought:
Using dialogs for field input allows those who don't want to (by
script) move the pointer over the button to instead move the button
under the pointer using intelligent dialog positioning.
--
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.com/who.htm
"
A colleague asked me if Rev can use OCX and/or VCL.
(terms that sincerely I don't understand)
Thanks in advance
Antonio Di Berardino
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--- Dar Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do arrow keys work? Is this the engine or some
> script?
>
> After I click in a group the arrow keys do not work.
> Maybe this is
> related to my arrow-key-in-TD problems.
>
I'm not sure I'm catching your drift here: are you
referring to the abil
On Sonntag, Dezember 29, 2002, at 06:52 Uhr, J. Landman Gay wrote:
The mystery of the trinity, the grouping of three Persons in one God.
I'm sure you could resolve this much simpler mystery in short order.
It depends on whether God is placed on the card or not. I suppose one
could assume th
On Sonntag, Dezember 29, 2002, at 06:22 Uhr, Chipp Walters wrote:
Are you talking about Microsoft...or Apple? ;-)
http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macos8/Legacy/legacy.html
??
regards
Wolfgang M. Bereuter
Learn easy with trainingsmaps©
INTERNETTRAINER Wolfgang M. Bereuter
Edelhofg.
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 02:17 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
I just tested this in 1.1.1, and it worked. Exactly how are you trying
to place the group? If you're scripting using the message box, you need
to refer to it using the background keyword.
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 03:55 P
How do arrow keys work? Is this the engine or some script?
After I click in a group the arrow keys do not work. Maybe this is
related to my arrow-key-in-TD problems.
Dar Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 12:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
A group may be removed from all cards but still exist in the stack.
Getting the owner of such a stack creates an error.
Yikes! The owner is the stack. And the stack is next in its path.
I had somehow corrupted the stack with some
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 02:43 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
A group may have its backgroundBehavior property set to true. Such a
group introduces interesting paths on any card it is on. This group
is also placed on new cards under some conditions. The card/stack
property backgroundNames
--- Björnke_von_Gierke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sonntag, Dez 29, 2002, at 18:52 Europe/Zurich, J.
> Landman Gay wrote:
>
> > Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> This awesome probing of the deep and wondrous
> mysteries of groups
> >> suggest to me that this accomplished assem
On Sonntag, Dez 29, 2002, at 18:52 Europe/Zurich, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This awesome probing of the deep and wondrous mysteries of groups
suggest to me that this accomplished assembly of programmers might
consider turning their talents to another group m
Hi Jaqueline,
Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This awesome probing of the deep and wondrous mysteries of groups
suggest to me that this accomplished assembly of programmers might
consider turning their talents to another group mystery that has
plagued mankind for centuries:
The m
I suppose one could assume that God's backgroundBehavior is always
set to true,
Jacque, Jim, et al:
Does this affect the message hierarchy among the Trinity?
--
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.com/who.htm
"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a
Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This awesome probing of the deep and wondrous mysteries of groups
suggest to me that this accomplished assembly of programmers might
consider turning their talents to another group mystery that has
plagued mankind for centuries:
The mystery of the t
Hehehe, I guess we're all a bit guilty about doing
that ; whenever we update our software, there's
usually something we change -- hopefully for the
better, right?
But whereas at Microsoft (and Sun as well, when it
comes to Java) the drones seem to run off in different
directions constantly with ove
Jan,
Are you talking about Microsoft...or Apple? ;-)
http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macos8/Legacy/legacy.html
> You forgot the part where they go "Of course we can
> change our minds at random. And then you have a new
> standard. Until we change our minds again, that is."
>
> Jan Schenk
Here is an altogether different approach to solving the original
measured response problem. Use a different input method.
I don't know if this program is for general distribution or for a
specific center. You could either use a touchscreen or trackpad with a
template. Trackpads cost less than $
on 12/29/02 7:39 AM, Rob Cozens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> You mean you can place a group across mutiple cards without
>> having the backgroundBehavior set?
>
> One can place any group on any existing card. BackgroundBehavior
> just determines whether the group is automatically placed on eac
Why "modeless" instead of modal dialogs?
Alan, David, et al:
My initial thought was to use modal dialogs, as one goal is to
prevent the user from visiting other portions of the app until the
input process is completed.
OTOH, a modeless dialog would allow the user to, for example,
copy/paste
--- Rob Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You mean you can place a group across mutiple cards
> without
> >having the backgroundBehavior set?
>
> One can place any group on any existing card.
> BackgroundBehavior
> just determines whether the group is automatically
> placed on each new
> car
--- Rob Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Does MS even read the SMTP spec?
> >
> >(I know, I know, "Microsoft" and "specification"
> should never be used in the
> >same sentence ).
>
> "Specifications? We don't have any specifications.
> We don't need to
> follow specifications. We don't ha
Does MS even read the SMTP spec?
(I know, I know, "Microsoft" and "specification" should never be used in the
same sentence ).
"Specifications? We don't have any specifications. We don't need to
follow specifications. We don't have to show you any stinking
specifications: We're Microsoft..
A very Happy New Year to all. May your expectations during the New
Year be exceeded.
Regards ... Bob
At 83 and still learning something new every day. (Me)
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 03:15 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
A group may have its backgroundBehavior property set to true. Such a
group introduces interesting paths on any card it is on. This group
is also placed on new cards under some conditions. The card/stack
property backgroundNames
I just tested this in 1.1.1, and it worked. Exactly how are you trying
to place the group? If you're scripting using the message box, you need
to refer to it using the background keyword.
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 03:55 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
I removed a group from all cards it was on.
34 matches
Mail list logo