Storing Data Stacks inside OSX Bundle

2007-11-18 Thread Sivakatirswami
I saw that someone else was doing this... you can store a "main" stack (which needs to be saved) inside the standalone, splash screen engine stack's bundle... and seems to all work just fine... This has the obvious advantage of making sure they don't get separated, user just sees a single app

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Shari
Nice! I had expected a lot more of a memory issue. This will work out grand :-) I'm getting excited, doing the array this way solves some other problems I was pondering. Shari I think you'd have to have a much bigger amount of data to run into memory issues on a modern computer. Watching

Re: Storing Data Stacks inside OSX Bundle

2007-11-18 Thread Shari
I was doing it that way for awhile, storing stacks inside the MacOS folder of an OSX bundle. There are some caveats, but I'll tell you how it works. Right-Click on your application's icon. A menu will appear. Select "Show Package Contents". There will be one folder called Contents. In th

Revbrowser & Standalone

2007-11-18 Thread Ludovic Thébault
Hello, In rev 281, on MacOS 10.5, my stack works fine with revbrowser but if i made a standalone (with browser as external) i haven't my web page with no errors. The url is ok. If i put "answer tBrowserId" just after the revBrowserOpen function, i've "1" as result (so it's seem "ok" also

Re: Revbrowser & Standalone

2007-11-18 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Ludovic, You may need something similar to: XBrowser_Set "rect", the rect of this card,1 (where 1 is the browser instance ID). Best regards, Mark Schonewille -- Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Quickly extract data from y

Re: Revbrowser & Standalone

2007-11-18 Thread Ludovic Thébault
Le 18 nov. 07 à 16:42, Mark Schonewille a écrit : Hi Ludovic, You may need something similar to: XBrowser_Set "rect", the rect of this card,1 (where 1 is the browser instance ID). It's already done : revbrowserset tBrowserID, "rect", the rect of image "xxx" (i've take the script of the

Re: (mac) application menu

2007-11-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Bill Vlahos wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> FWIW, I just created a new stack, added a menubar, and built a >> standalone, all using only Rev's default settings. The engine >> responds to the OS' aevt/quit normally as expected, quitting the >> app without issue. >>

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Petrides, M.D. Marian wrote: Speaking of arrays... Am I correct in understanding that Rev only supports one dimensional arrays or am I misreading the dox? Rev currently supports associative arrays. Unlike numerically indexed arrays, associative array keys are not restricted to integers only,

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Petrides, M.D. Marian
Thanks, Richard! This is very helpful. On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Petrides, M.D. Marian wrote: Speaking of arrays... Am I correct in understanding that Rev only supports one dimensional arrays or am I misreading the dox? Rev currently supports associative arrays.

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Ken Ray
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:31:41 -0600, Petrides, M.D. Marian wrote: > Thanks, Richard! This is very helpful. This might help as well; it was an article I wrote trying to compare Director's arrays with Revolution's, but it gives an "inside peek" on how Revolution sees/works with arrays: http://

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Petrides, M.D. Marian
Thanks!! On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Ken Ray wrote: On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:31:41 -0600, Petrides, M.D. Marian wrote: Thanks, Richard! This is very helpful. This might help as well; it was an article I wrote trying to compare Director's arrays with Revolution's, but it gives an "inside peek

Re: (mac) application menu

2007-11-18 Thread Bill Vlahos
Richard, I think these problems are bugzilla'd originally in 4994 and then also in 5362 (which is marked as a duplicate of 4994). However, the workaround does not work for me. On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: My first test was with the current shipping version, v2.8.1gm3.

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Troy Rollins
On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Ken Ray wrote: This might help as well; it was an article I wrote trying to compare Director's arrays with Revolution's, but it gives an "inside peek" on how Revolution sees/works with arrays: http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/arry001.htm Ken,

Re: Size of array

2007-11-18 Thread Ken Ray
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:35:24 -0500, Troy Rollins wrote: > Ken, I notice that the article, while correct, isn't actually > representative of how arrays are *actually* used in Director. > While constructs like "getAt(getAt(myList,2),1)" would in fact work, > I have *never* seen anyone do that. Wh