Hello,
A 2.9-built standalone's printing function suddenly no
longer works -- kind of.
Looking thru the archives, a likely culprit is Vista.
Anyway. I say "kind of", cause I did finally manage
to get a print-out when I over-rode my printer's
"automatic paper-tray selection" option and, instead,
Recently, Chipp Walters wrote:
>> While I agree with the posting that Mark made a few weeks back about not
>> spamming the list
Nah, that's OK. I get it -- she's right. :-)
> If you take another look, you'll find some excellent FREE Rev
> demo stacks and tutorials on Scott's site. He's always b
Thank you Sarah, I'll give that a try!
Marty
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Marty Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a stack from which I create a text file that has to be uploaded to a
server. The file can be either a tab or comma delimited file. I'm creating
it in Rev 3.0 Studio on
Shao Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I agree with the posting that Mark made a few weeks back about not
> spamming the list with non-Rev related postings,
So much for friendly correspondence on this list. ;-)
BTW, If you take another look, you'll find some excellent FREE Rev
demo stacks a
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Marty Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a stack from which I create a text file that has to be uploaded to a
> server. The file can be either a tab or comma delimited file. I'm creating
> it in Rev 3.0 Studio on my iMac with 10.5.5. I'm getting an error that
Hello again fellow Revolutionaries : )
I have built an interface where users can keep on adding new layers of
information down a stack window by clicking a button at the bottom of the
bottom most layer (the button clones the last group and re-populates the
fields to suit the new context).
Because
I have a stack from which I create a text file that has to be uploaded
to a server. The file can be either a tab or comma delimited file. I’m
creating it in Rev 3.0 Studio on my iMac with 10.5.5. I’m getting an
error that I’ve traced to an end-of-line problem. The file looks fine on
my Mac but
Tom,
Boy! Today IS a slow one. (smile)
Thanks,
Joe Wilkins
On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
Joe,
This will add the X in one shot before each field for you.
on mouseUp pMouseBtnNo
repeat with x = 1 to the number of fields of card 1
set the name of fld x to (
Jim,
Thanks for the routine. I had already done something similar. It
wasn't that big a deal. As I said, wrong side of the bed. Or my
arthritis!
Joe Wilkins
On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
Referring to objects using numbers as labels is a risky practice
since Rev
will resolv
Joe,
This will add the X in one shot before each field for you.
on mouseUp pMouseBtnNo
repeat with x = 1 to the number of fields of card 1
set the name of fld x to ( "X" & x)
end repeat
end mouseUp
It might be easier to think of 1 and "1" as reserved words in this
instance.
Scott,
I understand; just feeling a bit argumentative this morning. Wrong
side of the bed? (smile)
Thanks,
Joe Wilkins
On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Joe -- it's not a backward compatibility issue, it's an ambiguity
issue. If
you say "field 1" in your scripts, Revolution
On 10/7/08 5:16 PM, "Joe Lewis Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attention:
>
> I'm doing some math on a form. Carefully, I thought, I numbered the
> various flds so that I could refer to them in sequence or, at least,
> know what their names are by their positions without having to
> constan
Recently, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
> I kind of suspected that was probably the case, but we all
> like to save keystrokes when we can; particularly when there are a lot
> of them. Incidentally, the pointer tooltips plug-in 2.0 that Chipp
> recently released provides the field names as I had design
Hi Mark,
And thanks. I kind of suspected that was probably the case, but we all
like to save keystrokes when we can; particularly when there are a lot
of them. Incidentally, the pointer tooltips plug-in 2.0 that Chipp
recently released provides the field names as I had designed them "1",
Hi Joe,
Are you using "1", "2" etc. as field names? That's wrong. Revolution
parses these names as numbers, regardless of the quotes. You must add
some characters to make sure that Revolution parses the name as a
string, e.g. "Val 1", "Val 2", etc.
You can refer to these fields in a repea
Attention:
I'm doing some math on a form. Carefully, I thought, I numbered the
various flds so that I could refer to them in sequence or, at least,
know what their names are by their positions without having to
constantly check them out. However, when it came time to refer to them
I was a
Mikey-3
No, I have no experience with the SMTP library! Are there any tutorials or
sample stacks that illustrate the use of the SMTP library?
Mikey-3 wrote:
>
> Are you aware of the SMTP library? That would be the way you would
> normally send email from RR without getting anything else invo
While I agree with the posting that Mark made a few weeks back about
not spamming the list with non-Rev related postings, I'd just like to
point out that you should always have a non-Flash fallback for your
navigation..
___
use-revolution mailing l
Are you aware of the SMTP library? That would be the way you would
normally send email from RR without getting anything else involved.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and man
What an incredibly talented person!
Congratulations and thanks!
Neal
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Revolutionaries:
>
> Just a quick note to announce the redesign/release of Tactile Media's Web
> site (www.tactilemedia.com). The site update is not
Is there a simple way to code to send an e-mail from within Revolution
without using an e-mail client such as Apple's Mail? I have a program that
is designed to send a report as a text file. I run into a problem with
RevMail using an e-mail program when the user uses a web based e-mail
program.
--
Scott,
Looks awesome! Thanks for this!
Judy
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Revolutionaries:
>
> Just a quick note to announce the redesign/release of Tactile Media's Web
> site (www.tactilemedia.com). The site update is not as important as a new
Hello Revolutionaries:
Just a quick note to announce the redesign/release of Tactile Media's Web
site (www.tactilemedia.com). The site update is not as important as a new
Revolution Tutorials/Demos area available in the Software section of the
site, which now features 32 free and open stacks, com
Malte Brill wrote:
if you want, please look at
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=7257
I too see leakage and drastic slowdowns under Linux, yet I could not
boil it down to something as atomic as in this test case.
Interesting test case, Malte. Thanks for that - I just added
Hi Richard,
if you want, please look at
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=7257
I too see leakage and drastic slowdowns under Linux, yet I could not
boil it down to something as atomic as in this test case.
Cheers,
malte
___
use-re
Mark Srebnik wrote:
Greetings,
Would like to convert a HyperCard Stack to Rev if possible. However, from
reading Jacqueline's excellent tutorial on this I see the following
problems.
A) Since I use OSX on my MacBook at home, I don't have ability to run
HyperCard; ie, no Classic anymore...
B)
Bernard Devlin wrote:
Ok, so since Chipp thinks my benchmark is pretty crummy (which I'm happy to
believe), can someone provide me with what they think would be a better way
to benchmark the speed of the different engines? I'm reluctant to use
Wilhelm's suggestion on Linux, since there is a kno
Hi Mark,
Just suppress messages before you open the stack and edit the scripts.
See the Development menu.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum/
Benefit fr
Greetings,
Would like to convert a HyperCard Stack to Rev if possible. However, from
reading Jacqueline's excellent tutorial on this I see the following
problems.
A) Since I use OSX on my MacBook at home, I don't have ability to run
HyperCard; ie, no Classic anymore...
B) Since I don't have HC
Before anyone else jumps in. Richmond, it seems I'm the only one having
issues with 2.9 and 3.0.
It might be useful for you to download the evaluation versions (particularly
if you are using Linux), to see if the product is buggy for you. If not,
you've got a good reason to fill the jar asap.
B
1. A bit short of money right now.
2. For reasons that have been confirmed in the Use-List since RR 3 was
released: the very same reason why I bought a Mac G4 two weeks after they
released the G5s.
Microsoft and Apple have been slammed time and time again for releasing
software (operating syst
Wilhelm, thanks for this suggestion. I've posted a new request to the list
explaining why I would hesitate to use this with Linux.
Bernard
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Wilhelm Sanke, FB01 <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun Oct 5, 2008, Bernard Devlin bdrunrev at gmail.com wrote:
>
> "If
Ok, so since Chipp thinks my benchmark is pretty crummy (which I'm happy to
believe), can someone provide me with what they think would be a better way
to benchmark the speed of the different engines? I'm reluctant to use
Wilhelm's suggestion on Linux, since there is a known memory leak to do with
33 matches
Mail list logo
