Would something that takes input from joystick and emulates it into
keystrokes be acceptable?
http://www.oneswitch.org.uk/2/I/JoyToKey/JoyToKey.htm
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/data-from-USB-joystick-tp2714272p2716671.html
Sent from the Revolut
Here's the direct link:
http://www.macnn.com/articles/10/09/27/revamp.offers.new.ios.development.environment/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
Posted an hour ago apparently:
http://www.macnn.com
Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinf
That reminds me of the chorus of a song that takes me well back to the mid
80s and being a schoolkid:
"Hey, hey 16k
What does that get you today?
It's not enough even for a letter
Old school RAM packs were much better!"
Steve
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4
You can work out exactly what you want if you realize that the result
of "the selectedChunk" is always char to
of field , and this will be as you would expect if the selection is
not empty:
ie, in "this is a sample string of text" in field 1, selecting the
characters "is a sample" would
Nevermind. *sigh* Number of words prior to selection or insertion point is
put the number of words of (char 1 to (word 2 of the selectedchunk) of
field 1)
Rev is far more amazing than I can make it be. So is Livecode!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> Ok thats cool.
Ok thats cool.
So if its NOT just an insertion point then
the number of words of char 1 to (word 2 of the selectedchunk) of field
"yourfield"
will give the number of words preceeding the selection?
So this whole thing could boil down to
on mouseUp
if word 4 of the selectedchunk < word 2 of the
The selectedChunk gives the segment of text selected, in the form
char to of field
If the selection is empty (insertion point only), the result is
something like "char 5 to 4 of field 9" -- in this case to get the
number of the word containing the insertion point, use:
the number of
Message: 18
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:59:01 -0700
From: Mark Wieder
Subject: Re: What have I done?
To: How to use Revolution
Message-ID: <28318156578.20100927095...@ahsoftware.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Devin-
Monday, September 27, 2010, 9:47:13 AM, you wrote:
Luxury!
On 09/27/2010 06:22 PM, David Glasgow wrote:
On 27 Sep 2010, at 2:12 pm, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
[ they cannot be that other-worldly ]
Oh but they are!
(or at least, too alien for my abilities)
And yes, the point is not to have any set up panel run separately from the
LiveCard standalon
Devin-
Monday, September 27, 2010, 9:47:13 AM, you wrote:
> Luxury! I dream about having a register! All I have is the bottom
> of a rusty soup tin, and I have to scratch tick marks on it with a
> broken stick!
Wow! A soup tin... all I have is... aw, I forget what I have...
--
-Mark Wieder
m
Luxury! I dream about having a register! All I have is the bottom of a rusty
soup tin, and I have to scratch tick marks on it with a broken stick!
On Sep 27, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
> at least you got 8k... all I have are a couple registers and a very short
> stack...
>
> On Mon
You may want to back that up off site.
Craig
In a message dated 9/27/10 12:28:40 PM, jhurley0...@sbcglobal.net writes:
> I used to have about 68 K short term memory. ItÂ
> has dwindled to about 8 k.
>
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@li
at least you got 8k... all I have are a couple registers and a very short
stack...
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:28 PM, James Hurley wrote:
> Craig and Mark,
>
> That was the problem. I have a vague recollection of changing that in the
> preference dialog box just to see what would happen, and then
Craig and Mark,
That was the problem. I have a vague recollection of changing that in
the preference dialog box just to see what would happen, and then the
phone rang. By the time I got of the phone my short term memory bank
had been reprogrammed. I used to have about 68 K short term memor
James-
Monday, September 27, 2010, 9:01:54 AM, you wrote:
> Rev 4.0 is in revolt. (LiveCode is fine.)
> I write in script:
> put 3 into x
> and when I try to compile I get a message "Can't create a variable by
> that name."
You have turned on the explicitVariables failsafe mechanism, whi
Did you change your preferences, checking "strict compilation mode"? This
would require that you declare your variables, and not be able to load them
on the fly.
Craig Newman
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
P.S.
I can run preexisting scripts, I just can't make any changes. It is as
if I have lost privileges.
Jim
Rev 4.0 is in revolt. (LiveCode is fine.)
I write in script:
put 3 into x
and when I try to compile I get a message "Can't create a variable
by that name."
Or any other name
Rev 4.0 is in revolt. (LiveCode is fine.)
I write in script:
put 3 into x
and when I try to compile I get a message "Can't create a variable by
that name."
Or any other name for that matter.
I think I may have messed up the global variables. They are the same
as before except for the
On 27 Sep 2010, at 2:12 pm, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>
> [ they cannot be that other-worldly ]
Oh but they are!
(or at least, too alien for my abilities)
And yes, the point is not to have any set up panel run separately from the
LiveCard standalone.
Best Wishes,
David Glasgow
Carlton
http://forums.runrev.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3199
Not the post I was thinking of, but some really useful stuff in that forum
thread about whole word selections.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Warren Kuhl wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Thank you very much. You have been most helpful!
>
> All the b
Mike,
Thank you very much. You have been most helpful!
All the best!
Warren
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> Would have to program it, and now that i'm more awake, not sure you need to
> go through all the convoluted stuff I did.
>
> This is probably closer to what you c
Would have to program it, and now that i'm more awake, not sure you need to
go through all the convoluted stuff I did.
This is probably closer to what you can end up with.
on mouseUp
put word 2 of the selectedchunk into tChar
put char 1 to tChar of field 1 into tTmp
put the number of word
Mike,
Thank you very much for this. I really appreciate it. Looks exactly like
what I was looking for.
You mentioned forcing only whole words. Is this a command? Or something I
would need to program?
Thanks again!
Warren
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> I'm positiv
I'm positive this can be shortened, but as is should do what you want. It
could be simplified greatly of course if you are forcing only whole word
selections, but this will account for partial word selects, and also just an
insertion point.
*
on mouseUp
-- Determine if there is actually a select
Dear RunRev/LiveCode users,
I am pleased to announce that Economy-x-Talk has just released a new version of
the Installer Maker Plugin for Runtime Revolution/LiveCode. The Installer Maker
Plugin is a tool to quickly wrap your RR/LC standalones in an installer for Mac
OS X or Windows. This new v
I found I could crash 4.5 reliably by clicking on a certain button in
my rather complex clinical management stack. The button sets up an
enhanced find function then lists the cards on which a textstring is
found in a given field. I have not been able to track down at which
point in my scrip
Is there an easy way to retrieve the word # of a field based on the
SelectedChunk? The SelectedChunk contains the start/end position of a word
of a field. Just am trying to determine which word without to much
coding...if possible.
Thanks for any help!
Warren
Thanks for that Monte,
On 27 September 2010 13:44, Monte Goulding wrote:
> UNIQUE INDEX `mykey` (`name`, `type`, `location`, `handler_num`) );
>
> Or you can use a separate Create Unique Index statement.
>
OK - will have to read up more on Indexes - I thought they were just for
speeding up sea
On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Michael D Mays wrote:
Thanks Mark and Craig,
That's what I need.
Unfortunately that property doesn't show up in the dictionary as a
property of a field (only a button) so it makes it a little hard to
find. :(
And the syntax example for formatedWidth some punctu
Try:
-- -
-- Table `handler`
-- -
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `handler` (
`id` INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT ,
`name` VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL ,
`type` VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL ,
`location` VARC
OK - not getting very far with that - Google is not my friend :)
Can you give me an idea of what the CREATE statement would look like?
CREATE TABLE 'handler' (
> 'name' VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
'type' VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
> 'location' VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
> 'handler_num' INTEGE
> HI Monte - hows down-under :)
Getting better all the time ;-)
>
> Only by making the primary key = "name,type,location,hnum" instead of "id"
> woudl you get a fast normalisation of the data inserted.
You can create an secondary key for those fields and still use your primary key
auto-incremen
HI Monte - hows down-under :)
On 27 September 2010 11:31, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> I haven't yet used SQLYoga but I'm sure Trevor has this all worked out.
> SQLite will handle the auto increment of integer primary keys when you
> INSERT without an ID field and then you query
> put revDataFromQue
Hi David
>
> However if I uses a
> surrogate primary key (ie the usual auto-incremented numeric id field), for
> each updated record I need to check first whether it is already in the
> database before adding it - this is a lot of overhead in terms of finding
> the ids based on other fields.
I ha
I've spent the weekend refreshing on databases. I'm using LiveCode and also
Trevor's fabulous sqlYoga, and beginning to realise how little I know about
databases! The question I've got is about the database schema design and
optimising it for the speed of adding records.
* Exporting Handlers*
I th
36 matches
Mail list logo