Re: [OT] IE6 Funeral

2010-03-06 Thread Jim Ault
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:41 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: I really wonder about these much vaunted "standards" and how valuable they really are. Surely the only "standards" that are needed are: The program works, It doesn't leak credit card numbers like a sieve. Actually, the deviation from s

Re: [OT] IE6 Funeral

2010-03-05 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 06/03/2010 06:59, Bob Sneidar wrote: Oh hey! Everyone wants to comply with standards. Their own personal standards. ;-) Bob I really wonder about these much vaunted "standards" and how valuable they really are. Surely the only "standards" that are needed are: The program works, It

Re: [OT] IE6 Funeral

2010-03-05 Thread Bob Sneidar
Oh hey! Everyone wants to comply with standards. Their own personal standards. ;-) Bob On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > Scott- > > Friday, March 5, 2010, 5:57:22 PM, you wrote: > >> This is years overdue. Here's hoping everybody moves on and this bane of >> developers' exist

Re: [OT] IE6 Funeral

2010-03-05 Thread Mark Wieder
Scott- Friday, March 5, 2010, 5:57:22 PM, you wrote: > This is years overdue. Here's hoping everybody moves on and this bane of > developers' existence never returns. > ...and from the comments section: "Yay! Now that people aren’t using the standards abusing brow

[OT] IE6 Funeral

2010-03-05 Thread Scott Rossi
This is years overdue. Here's hoping everybody moves on and this bane of developers' existence never returns. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX Design ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution