Thanks very much, Chipp. Greatly appreciated.
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-re
That was fast... dug up:
http://www.wesleyverhoeve.com/why-myspace-failed-or-when-you-kill-the-user-experience-you-kill-yourself
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
Chipp-
Monday, September 6, 2010, 5:36:38 PM, you wrote:
> All three of these social networking communities have grown in an ad hoc
> fashion. Changing quickly to take advantage of the trends. MySpace is an
> example of one who didn't change fast enough, and now is left behind.
Or one might say
Google pay per click advertisement is getting so very expensive-- esp for
our client in the auto insurance business where a single ad click can go as
high as $130! Yes, Geico or Progressive or other pay up to that amount just
to have you click on their Google Ad when searching for "auto insurance."
On 6 Sep 2010, at 21:04, Chipp Walters wrote:
> More at
> http://dlvr.it/4gnsY
I confess I'm totally ignorant of the social networking thing. I read the links
you posted, but not knowing much about the networks they were comparing with, I
didn't really follow. I was hoping you might have summa
Chipp-
Monday, September 6, 2010, 1:04:50 PM, you wrote:
> Our company does a lot of work in the Online Digital Marketing
> space. This stuff is interesting. There are no right and wrong
> answers.
...there may be a lot of wrong ones floating around out there...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsof
You're a funny guy, Dave!
No trick question, just wondering how much effect PING will have. There's one
theory which says this is just the beginning of social networking built around
a single venue, others see it doomed to failure because it's too commercialized.
Our company does a lot of work
How would the "Social Networks" supposed notion really make sense when we are
daily bused by (and about) "Ethological Networks" businesses only. Are FaceBook
and Twitter in social tasks involved in any way ? iTunes Ping ? Pathetic ...
Le 6 sept. 2010 à 05:04, Chipp Walters a écrit :
> Any e
On 09/06/2010 06:19 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Chipp-
Sunday, September 5, 2010, 8:04:56 PM, you wrote:
Any early thoughts on Apple's new social network? It seems to be getting some
concerned reviews.
http://bit.ly/dn5AON
Hadn't heard about Ping until your note, but I like Eric Schwarz
Chipp-
Sunday, September 5, 2010, 8:04:56 PM, you wrote:
> Any early thoughts on Apple's new social network? It seems to be getting some
> concerned reviews.
> http://bit.ly/dn5AON
Hadn't heard about Ping until your note, but I like Eric Schwarz's
comment (pasted here because I can't figure out
On 09/06/2010 01:18 PM, Dave Cragg wrote:
On 6 Sep 2010, at 04:04, Chipp Walters wrote:
Any early thoughts on Apple's new social network? It seems to be getting some
concerned reviews.
http://bit.ly/dn5AON
Is this a trick question, Chipp?
Anyway, I agree with whatever your thoughts
On 6 Sep 2010, at 04:04, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Any early thoughts on Apple's new social network? It seems to be getting some
> concerned reviews.
> http://bit.ly/dn5AON
Is this a trick question, Chipp?
Anyway, I agree with whatever your thoughts are, unless they're wrong. :-)
Dave
___
Any early thoughts on Apple's new social network? It seems to be getting some
concerned reviews.
http://bit.ly/dn5AON
Chipp Walters
CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to s
Dar Scott wrote:
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our testers have discovered that when Revolution does a shell("ping")
to a
server that isn't responding, that the timeouts are much different,
depending on
which version of Mac OS X one is on. In Mac OS 10.3.2, we get
feedb
ubject: Re: OT: Ping timeout much longer with 10.3.7
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Our testers have discovered that when Revolution does a shell("ping")
> to a
> server that isn't responding, that the timeouts are much different,
> depending o
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our testers have discovered that when Revolution does a shell("ping")
to a
server that isn't responding, that the timeouts are much different,
depending on
which version of Mac OS X one is on. In Mac OS 10.3.2, we get
feedback in a
matter o
Our testers have discovered that when Revolution does a shell("ping") to a
server that isn't responding, that the timeouts are much different, depending
on
which version of Mac OS X one is on. In Mac OS 10.3.2, we get feedback in a
matter of seconds. In Mac OS 10.3.7, it takes over 2 minute
17 matches
Mail list logo