Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-10 Thread Wally Rodriguez
Most newer Macs have auto sensing and do not need a crossover cable anymore, they can do the crossover internally if they detect that they are connected to another computer instead of a switch or hub. On May 9, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Ault wrote: There is the 'old' way of using a cross-over

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-10 Thread Jim Ault
Thanks, and since I have always used a hub, switch or router, I did not know the new auto sensing capability Jim Ault Las Vegas On 5/10/06 5:46 AM, Wally Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most newer Macs have auto sensing and do not need a crossover cable anymore, they can do the crossover

[OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Scott Rossi
Hi List: Apologies for the OT question. I have an XP system and an OSX Mac sitting near each other that I'm wondering if I can network without using a router -- I'd like to move some Rev files back and forth for testing. (There is a wireless network in the area but no card for the XP system,

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Mark Talluto
On May 9, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Scott Rossi wrote: Hi List: Apologies for the OT question. I have an XP system and an OSX Mac sitting near each other that I'm wondering if I can network without using a router -- I'd like to move some Rev files back and forth for testing. (There is a

[OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Richmond Mathewson
I have a Pentium 3 running Windows XP and a G4 Mirror Door running Mac OSX 10.4.6 - they are networked together via a Switch/Hub (this is not a router) using Ethernet: The settings for the XP box are as follows: Properties Internet protocol (TCP/IP); IP address 10.0.0.29 Subnet Mask

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Jim Ault
There is the 'old' way of using a cross-over ethernet cable. This allows the 2 computers to use that port to talk and listen. price is about $20. catch is that you are now using the port this way, so no internet access. Google 'crossover ethernet cable' to see how it is wired. Not many around

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Mark Talluto
On May 9, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Jim Ault wrote: Google 'crossover ethernet cable' to see how it is wired. Not many around so it is very unlikely that the cable you have is crossover. All Macs for the last few years automatically crossover the connection if you use a standard ethernet

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Bill
Thanks for your clear instructions. I just taped them to the monitor for my XP box as I can never get that thing to be on the network consistently. I also absolutely hate window's wizards and while I'm at it why is Outlook such a bad program while Entourage written by the same people works so

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Bill Marriott
Scott, You can do it but it may be more time consuming than it's worth because of the potential gotchas. First, not any Ethernet cable will do; you typically need to have a crossover cable. Most modern routers and switches (hubs) auto-detect and compensate for cables of either wiring flavor,

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, David Vaughan wrote: Take all the replies and wherever you see a negative comment (need crossover cable which costs $millions, can not network whatever) cross it out. Heh, thanks David. No worries -- I'm not thrown by negative comments; I've learned to wait for a few responses from

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Sivakatirswami
It's a hack, but if you run virtual PC on the Mac you might be able to set the other box as a share point? On May 09, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: Recently, David Vaughan wrote: Take all the replies and wherever you see a negative comment (need crossover cable which costs

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Andre Garzia
MacOS X has built-in windows sharing no need for VPC for that... On May 9, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Sivakatirswami wrote: It's a hack, but if you run virtual PC on the Mac you might be able to set the other box as a share point? On May 09, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: Recently, David

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hello, FYI, it is not necessary to use VPC for that. On the PC side, I have Client for MS Networks installed, together with the correct ethernet drivers. I have also a TCP/IP protocol defined for that Ethernet driver, with the correct IP number and subnet mask. Then I turned on file

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Alex Tweedly
Scott Rossi wrote: Recently, David Vaughan wrote: Take all the replies and wherever you see a negative comment (need crossover cable which costs $millions, can not network whatever) cross it out. Heh, thanks David. No worries -- I'm not thrown by negative comments; I've learned to

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread Bill Marriott
Unfortunately, these ad hoc networks are almost never straightforward. Been there, done that. And the OP couldn't get it to work either. Not trying to be negative, just trying to save people time. David Vaughan wrote [...] follow the remaining positive instructions and it should be a piece

Re: [OT] Routerless Network?

2006-05-09 Thread David Vaughan
On 10/05/2006, at 9:15, Mark Schonewille wrote: FYI, it is not necessary to use VPC for that. On the PC side, I have Client for MS Networks installed, together with the correct ethernet drivers. I have also a TCP/IP protocol defined for that Ethernet driver, with the correct IP number