Hi Guys,
Although Word looks better in it's new release ( I did follow
the link Richard G. provided ), it's so big I think they should split
the program up, providing simpler control input (intelligence).
bye
David
David Flanders
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 12, 2008,
Recently, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
At the time was thinking about huge corporations that have settled in on
using Office, or various government agencies. Even fairly mild updates, like
Office 97-2000, there's a lot of training that usually takes place to get
everyone up to speed. But then
New thinking is good. It may not always work (witness
Apple's decision to use documents within folders as iconic
folder representations in Leopard) but it needs to happen.
With new thinking, we get things like GLX2, a new way of
editing projects in Rev. So while new, and maybe a bit
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New thinking is good.
Sure, I don't argue new thinking is a great way to do new things. Take the
iPhone for instance. A lot of new thinking went into it, and it shows,
though the whole finger as pointing device I do take
One other thing about Ribbon. Microsoft now has incorporated it into it's
own MS Office User Interface Guidelines. So, they encourage licensees, or
actually demand they abide by certain rules or else they violate the terms
of the license the User Interface Guidelines. Which pretty much means they
Hi Lynn,
On Mar 13, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Microsoft doesn't usually make decisions that affect its big two of
Office/Windows without having reasons to do it - Im sure there was
loads of
research done. I actually participated in some of that in the
Windows 2000
era (and
Sadly disturbing. Makes one wonder who's making the decisions over in
Redmond.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=1oref=slogin
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia Design
___
use-revolution
Sadly disturbing. Makes one wonder who's making the
decisions over in Redmond.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=1or
ef=slogin
I've told everyone in my company not to upgrade - if we get a new Vista
machine, leave it. But otherwise, don't upgrade. Way, way too many
Scott Rossi wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=1oref=slogin
Sadly disturbing. Makes one wonder who's making the decisions over in
Redmond.
Magic 8-Ball? :)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?
_r=1oref=slogin
Hee hee hee.
- Steve Jobs
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Jim, I love it. Of course, I love all sorts of conspiracy theories -
even the really stupid ones. After the kinds of things Gates pulled,
initially, he would have deserved such treatment. (smile) Besides, The
Pirates of Silicon Valley needs a sequel.
Joe Wilkins
On Mar 12, 2008, at 1:27
We've deployed exactly one vista box. Since that time I've bought
several more XP boxes just to avoid vista. I still have a vista box
we purchased sitting in its box. It's probably going to stay there
for the foreseeable future.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL
On 3/12/08 11:00 AM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Rossi wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=1oref=slogin
Sadly disturbing. Makes one wonder who's making the decisions over in
Redmond.
Magic 8-Ball? :)
My current theory is that in a
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim, I love it. Of course, I love all sorts of conspiracy theories -
even the really stupid ones. After the kinds of things Gates pulled,
initially, he would have deserved such treatment. (smile)
No arguing Gates has
No kidding. The simple fact is, it's an inferior product at this time. WinXP
takes less memory, and generally work much faster.
One of the issues as I see it is MS took what...5 years to release this,
compared to Apple's regular release around every 2 years? Compound it with
the contradiction
Interesting article; but, as it also points out, the RECORD doesn't
necessarily tell the whole story, since those with bad/evil images are
the ones who need to make PUBLIC their good deeds in order to attempt
to fix things, much as the philandering spouse who unexpectedly
brings home roses
Chipp, others,
I tried to open google docs in my REV browser and it said I needed to
use a more up to date browser. BUT it will open in Safari. I think it
is a catch all error though since on the web in safari it needs to or
wants to open a new window.
Has anyone or yourself tried to
Let me get this straight. You're telling me the most noteworthy CEO
performer of all time, keeps all his charity contributions a secret, EXCEPT
for those done for the Democratic Party. Right.
Frankly, I doubt any of the school children aided by the 2 billion dollars
care WHY they are the
Hi Tom,
Nope, I haven't, but I'll ask Chris about it, and hopefully let you know
what he says.
best,
Chipp
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Thomas McGrath III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chipp, others,
I tried to open google docs in my REV browser and it said I needed to
use a more up to date
The simple fact is, there is ZERO compelling reason for the
average user to want to upgrade. Period. That's pretty sorry
for five plus years in development.
With regard to Office, it's not the OS, but a completely
different interface. So instead of evolutionary, it's
revolutionary.
IMO, one of the most interesting parts of the new Office interface, is it's
complete disdain for the past. In fact, ask any user of pre-2007 Office how
to simply Open or Print a document, and they're confounded. The old File,
Edit, ... menu structure is just GONE. Completely. Replaced by a round
Chipp Walters wrote:
IMO, one of the most interesting parts of the new Office interface, is it's
complete disdain for the past. In fact, ask any user of pre-2007 Office how
to simply Open or Print a document, and they're confounded. The old File,
Edit, ... menu structure is just GONE.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Richard Gaskin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chipp Walters wrote:
IMO, one of the most interesting parts of the new Office interface, is it's
complete disdain for the past. In fact, ask any user of pre-2007 Office how
to simply Open or Print a document, and
23 matches
Mail list logo
