Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-19 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Thierry wrote: Le 18 sept. 09 à 21:25, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : <> From a personal point of view I can see that Haiku looks quite sexy in GUI terms and probably boots and runs faster than a lot of Ubuntu distros [and to support this I should point out that I have just put my P3s in my

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-19 Thread Thierry
Le 18 sept. 09 à 21:25, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : <> From a personal point of view I can see that Haiku looks quite sexy in GUI terms and probably boots and runs faster than a lot of Ubuntu distros [and to support this I should point out that I have just put my P3s in my school BACK

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-18 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Andre Garzia wrote: Keep an eye on Haiku, it will make lots of noise. Have just burnt a CD and bunged it in the P4 . . . Live only, as don't want to lose my Happy Ubuntu Box: Hey, the boot is pretty fast. Nice, clean GUI; err . . . makes me think of Damn Small with its modified Fluxbox. No

RE: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Lynn Fredricks
> the BeOS IP passed from hand to hand and now is owned by > Access (who brought it from palm) (whoever they are). I think it might be this: http://www.access-company.com/. They were a Linux focused company in Japan that went on a pretty big shopping spree and are very, very focused on the Japane

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Andre Garzia wrote: Lynn, the BeOS IP passed from hand to hand and now is owned by Access (who brought it from palm) (whoever they are). BeOS was Great! I used it a lot, now, as soon as Haiku becomes a little more stable, it will become my own desktop os here for most of my computers, except my

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Andre Garzia
Lynn, the BeOS IP passed from hand to hand and now is owned by Access (who brought it from palm) (whoever they are). BeOS was Great! I used it a lot, now, as soon as Haiku becomes a little more stable, it will become my own desktop os here for most of my computers, except my macs... if Rev ever ru

RE: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Lynn Fredricks
> SOT - Slightly Off Topic > > http://www.haiku-os.org/ > > Will RunRev be able, in the future, to produce standalones > for this Be OS clone? BeOS...alas poor yorick. Jean-Louis Gassée got me to write for the BeOS Developer Journal and there was some efforts going on to make way for BeOS softw

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Wieder
Richmond- Thursday, September 17, 2009, 7:34:26 AM, you wrote: >> Look at the about box for that system and look into past mantainers... >> you'll see, me! :D >> > Look up 'Ubiquitous' in your dictionary . . . :) ROTFL -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net _

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Why do I have a "funny feeling" related to the Google Chrome noise, and now Haiku, that there are very shortly going to be a number of OSes that may effectively undermine the 90% Windows - 10% Macintosh dominance. I am not psychic, but I can always tell when rain is coming by the smell in the

Re: [SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Andre Garzia
Richmond, Look at the about box for that system and look into past mantainers... you'll see, me! :D I created the network preferences for Haiku during the Google Summer of Code. Ok Ok, it is a very basic network preference pane but it is mine and it was done in C++ As for Rev running under haiku,

[SOT] Haiku ???

2009-09-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson
SOT - Slightly Off Topic http://www.haiku-os.org/ Will RunRev be able, in the future, to produce standalones for this Be OS clone? Will there be a revWeb plug-in for Haiku so that revlets can be accessed in Haiku-based web-browsers? I wonder what the uptake on this OS will be: I'm just going t