Re: 21 years ahead in math and blocked by a stupid field display bug?

2004-07-01 Thread Wouter
The other limit you will hit is a prime of 64k length (then you'll have to add a space ;-) I meant you'll have to add a return. W. ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Re: 21 years ahead in math and blocked by a stupid field display bug?

2004-07-01 Thread Andre Garzia
On Jul 1, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Dar Scott wrote: There is a bugzilla entry on this topic. Revolution requires white space to wrap. Perhaps there will be a change. To complicate things, if the width of the line is greater than 32K pixels, the field is not displayed correctly. However, if you are s

Re: 21 years ahead in math and blocked by a stupid field display bug?

2004-07-01 Thread Dar Scott
On Jul 1, 2004, at 9:23 AM, MisterX wrote: if I display a just a 100 digits number the field which has its dontwrap set to false persist in not wrapping this number! EVERY other program I can paste this number into will wrap the number correctly but not RunRev... There is a bugzilla entry on this t

Re: 21 years ahead in math and blocked by a stupid field display bug?

2004-07-01 Thread Wouter
Hi Xav, Sorry to say but is no bug. It is the way Scott Raney implemented the wrap in metacard. Wrap on words. Nothing else. His way of saying (in a mail years ago) was something like: "No spaces, no words, no wraps". May be a featurerequest to something as a new windowwrap property? The other li

21 years ahead in math and blocked by a stupid field display bug?

2004-07-01 Thread MisterX
Hi everyone, Im about to bring RR 21 years ahead of history: Apparently it will take until 2025 to discover a prime number with 1,000,000,000 digits. http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/notes/by_year.html I found a way to generate this BUT... if I display a just a 100 digits number the field w