I am still a little bit puzzled with the technical background of H264.
The QT7 player should support H264, but do I need a separate H264 codec
installer to encode? It seems there are different suppliers for this codec?
Which one is the best and where do I get it from? Can I use it in Sorenson
An: How to use Revolution
Betreff: Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime?
On Feb 16, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
I am still a little bit puzzled with the technical background of H264.
The QT7 player should support H264, but do I need a separate H264
codec
installer to encode
On Feb 16, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
I am still a little bit puzzled with the technical background of H264.
The QT7 player should support H264, but do I need a separate H264
codec
installer to encode?
To export out of QuickTime Player at all you would need to have paid
Hmm, didn't thought about that yet. I have never compared quality and size
against a video, but giving each frame a unique filename sounds to quite
some work
Thanks for the hint
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
Hi Tiemo,
Hmm, didn't thought about that yet. I have never compared quality
and size
against a video, but giving each frame a unique filename sounds to
quite
some work
No need to use separate files for the frames!
You can even control frames of animated gifs in Rev!
Check framecount,
Hi Colin,
interesting aspect, I have to check, if my encoder supports H264 and how
about size/quality. The only thing I have read about H264 is that it takes
much processor power and could get into troubles on old machines. Up to now
I wanted to use Sorenson Video3 Pro codec.
Yes I thought about
On Feb 15, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote:
interesting aspect, I have to check, if my encoder supports H264 and
how
about size/quality. The only thing I have read about H264 is that it
takes
much processor power and could get into troubles on old machines. Up
to now
I wanted
What about sound? Aren't animated gifs silent?
--- Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tiemo,
Hmm, didn't thought about that yet. I have never compared quality
and size
against a video, but giving each frame a unique filename sounds to
quite
some work
No need to use
The main arguments against animated gifs would be the lack of color
range, and the file size. If there are 17000 files of 1-4 seconds
each, so let's say 36000 seconds worth altogether, that's the same
amount of time as five full length Hollywood movies, and with double
layer discs being enough
Yes, in this case, I don't have audio at all...
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Luis
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 15:41
An: How to use Revolution
Betreff: Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime?
Someone
Another issue you may wish to consider, is how powerful a machine the
playback will be on. A recent cient of ours had to forgo the Flash
solution in favor of QT because Flash is considerably more processor
intensive than QT...by a lot.
___
use-revolution
Colin Holgate
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 16:02
An: How to use Revolution
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Flash or Quicktime?
The main arguments against animated gifs would be the lack of color
range, and the file size. If there are 17000 files of 1-4 seconds
each, so let's say 36000 seconds
Interesting to hear, I didn't know that
Thanks for sharing
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Chipp Walters
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 16:20
An: How to use Revolution
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Flash
Someone had to spoil the party... :)
Good point, but I had assumed that at 1-4 seconds per file that there
really wasn't much sound to talk about (intentional pun..).
Could be linked to fire off (if necessary) a separate sound file.
Oh, and about the individual filenames per frame: This the
Thank you for your points, Stephen
Tiemo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Stephen Barncard
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 17:22
An: How to use Revolution
Betreff: Re: Flash or Quicktime?
And another
its a bit more than throwing the qt installer on and sending them a
couple copies of your disc. you must install qt with your product w.o
the user being able to stop the qt installation. it was all a bit of
hassle and it changes (another pain). in the past they have done
things like your
: Flash or Quicktime?
Another issue you may wish to consider, is how powerful a machine the
playback will be on. A recent cient of ours had to forgo the Flash
solution in favor of QT because Flash is considerably more processor
intensive than QT...by a lot.
This is apparently one
Another issue you may wish to consider, is how powerful a machine the
playback will be on. A recent cient of ours had to forgo the Flash
solution in favor of QT because Flash is considerably more processor
intensive than QT...by a lot.
This is apparently one of the reasons the iPhone doesn't
If you want to stick to a 'movie' format: You could package up the
Theora codecs with your installer (for each OS) but you'd have to
re-encode them for Theora (there's plenty of free apps that will do
this). Theora may be 'new/beta'ish' but has been in solid use in some
large projects for a
From: Scott Rossi
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Flash or Quicktime?
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/iphone/iphone-adobe-flash-support-coming-275317.php
More opinion...
http://daringfireball.net/2008/02/news_flash_no_flash
http://daringfireball.net/2008/02/flash_iphone_calculus
Terry
20 matches
Mail list logo
