On 12/17/05 9:50 AM, Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/17/05 3:14 AM, Dick Kriesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
before asking about that
On 12/19/05 4:00 PM, Dick Kriesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for asking, Ken. My answer is neither: I'm concerned because of the
following message from Scott Raney, which leads me to think there may be
some disqualifying problem in the design or implementation of the
executionContexts.
Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
before asking about that possibility. The result was a surprise, so here's
another question:
Would you please comment on the resolutions of BZ 724
On 12/17/05 3:14 AM, Dick Kriesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
before asking about that possibility.
Dick, are you saying that you can't use
Dick Kriesel wrote:
Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
before asking about that possibility. The result was a surprise, so here's
another question:
Would you please comment on the
