Re: Corruption of stack using clone

2003-12-24 Thread Richard Gaskin
Thomas J McGrath III wrote: I may have found a possible issue. I seem to have corrupted a whole new stack using SCRIPTED cloning. I put a button and a filed on a card of my main stack here is the code: on mouseUp clone stack 61i -- existing substack put it into mynewone set the

Re: Corruption of stack using clone

2003-12-24 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
On Dec 24, 2003, at 2:03 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Thomas J McGrath III wrote: I may have found a possible issue. Maybe the 72 is too short or because it has no alpha letters or is only a number is why it corrupted Is Rev reporting it as corrupted when you try to open it? If not, what

Corruption of stack using clone

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
Hello everyone, I have been building a rather large project and have a series of substacks for individual sections that are like slide presentations. Anyway, I have a card that has all the code I want to use with the buttons etc. on it. So I have been cloning the substack about 12 times and

Re: Corruption of stack using clone

2003-12-23 Thread Alex Rice
On Dec 23, 2003, at 9:07 PM, Thomas J McGrath III wrote: HAS anyone had the clone stack do this to them I need to clone about another 50 substacks of the master substack and don't want to corrupt my app again. Any help is going to really make me calm down. Not exactly- but here are some

Re: Corruption of stack using clone

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
OK, I think you are right on the money. And I would add Don't ever name a substack with just numbers I have tried it now twice and it has corrupted my whole stack and I hope not REV. I did do archives this time and lost no work but have learned a horrible lesson. Thanks for the response Tom