On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
re: support- on the contrary I think it would be easier for RR to
support a common interface instead of having people writing C code who
wouldn't otherwise want, need, or be capable of learning such a
low-level language.
Maybe.
It s
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
But when somebody says "I did the DLL-call thing to get a list of
watchamacallits from the system and all I got was garbage" then it is
hard to tell whether one has set up the call right or whether "pointer
to unsigned long" is broken o
Thanks to all for directing me to MetaCard FTP.
Yes, the interface to the rest of the world obviously did
not get much attention in the external implementation,
but it is a place to start. To see this stuff takes me back
about ten years.
While getting frustrated about Revolution last night,
I spent
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 10:48 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
the ability to make
direct system API calls right in the scripting language.
One way to do this on Windows might be the ability to make arbitrary
DLL calls. The problem here is that the call must be right.
Hopefully one day we'll s
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 01:50 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
But when somebody says "I did the DLL-call thing to get a list of
watchamacallits from the system and all I got was garbage" then it is
hard to tell whether one has set up the c
> After spending much time looking for DLL info, I see a message that it
> is in
> the folder, "External SDK", which is not anywhere on my computer.
>
No it's not. It was taken out in 2.0 because I think they are working on
some proper external docs. What was called the External SDK was about the
l
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:05 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
the ability to make
direct system API calls right in the scripting language.
One way to do this on Windows might be the ability to make arbitrary
DLL calls. The problem here is that the call must be right.
This t
I couldn't find the external SDK on the RunRev site just now either,
but it appears that it is still available from the Metacard FTP site:
ftp://ftp.metacard.com/MetaCard/
It has been part of past release- I don't know the history or pattern
behind it, however.
HTH
Brian
Gee!
After spending
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 07:26 PM, jleddy wrote:
Makes me feel like the small business edition is the no-business
edition.
No, it is not a conspiracy to get you to buy the Enterprise license, if
that is what you are asking.
The Externals SDK was included with Rev 1.x, but mysteriously
Alex Rice wrote:
> re: your choices. I know C, Objective-C, (some) C++ and Java but my
> productivity is just off-the-scale when I'm using Revolution as opposed
> to those other languages!
For this reason I envy one feature from ToolBook: the ability to make
direct system API calls right in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
