Thanks for the reply Bjoernke. I was probably too brief in my
question. When I set the decorations of a stack to menu, nothing
happens. The only way I know of to create a menubar on Windows or
Linux is to create a group and make it look like a menubar. Once
that's done setting
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the reply Bjoernke. I was probably too brief in my
question. When I set the decorations of a stack to menu, nothing
happens. The only way I know of to create a menubar on Windows or
Linux is to create a group and make it look like a menubar. Once
that's done setting
Thank you Klaus. The documentation on this is very misleading. Maybe
someone should add your sentence! :-))
On Aug 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Klaus Major wrote:
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the reply Bjoernke. I was probably too brief in my
question. When I set the decorations of a stack to menu
Timothy Bleiler wrote:
Thank you Klaus. The documentation on this is very misleading. Maybe
someone should add your sentence! :-))
On Aug 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Klaus Major wrote:
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the reply Bjoernke. I was probably too brief in my
question. When I set the decorations
According to the documentation
Use the menu keyword to give a window a menu bar (on Unix and Windows
systems).
I can't see that menu does anything in this context. Can anyone tell
me what I'm missing?
Thanks,
Tim Bleiler
___
use-revolution
set the decorations to menu
check out the menu keywords (and of course the decorations properties)
entry in the dictionary, it's very long ;)
Bjoernke
On 19 Aug 2009, at 22:18, Timothy Bleiler wrote:
According to the documentation
Use the menu keyword to give a window a menu bar
why
it isn't working, but since it works in new stacks, there must be
something in that particular stack that's causing the problem.
There are two things that will cause a titlebar to change: opening a
stack in a style that doesn't support the original decorations, or a
script that sets
Hi, I added a new subStack to this mainStack the decorations were set to
title,menue,minimize with two btn's, one to set it to
title,menue,minimize and two to set it to title,menue,minimize,close,
compiled it, opened up there was only one box, the close box disabled, then
when hitting btn 2
Hershel Fisch wrote:
Hi, I added a new subStack to this mainStack the decorations were set to
title,menue,minimize with two btn's, one to set it to
title,menue,minimize and two to set it to title,menue,minimize,close,
compiled it, opened up there was only one box, the close box disabled
typo
On 5/22/09 11:18 AM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Hershel Fisch wrote:
Hi, I added a new subStack to this mainStack the decorations were set to
title,menue,minimize with two btn's, one to set it to
title,menue,minimize and two to set it to title,menue,minimize,close
On 5/20/09 10:02 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Hershel Fisch wrote:
Hi, the way my stack is set up, the MainStack which is the splash screen
which has no title bar at all, all scripts are placed in that stack and then
about 35 subStacks.
What command do you use to
Hi Hershel,
I created a standalone with two buttons. One button sets the
decorations to title,menu,minimize and the other to menu,minimize.
Both buttons work as expected.
If I set the decorations before creating the standalone, the stack
appears with the menu, title and minimise box
Hershel Fisch wrote:
Hi, all I¹m having a bit of a problem with the decorations on windows when
building as a standalone
The decorations are set to ³title,menu,minimize² or ³menu,minimize² and in
fact it only has the close box and its disabled.
What is the style of the stack? Some styles don't
On 5/20/09 10:07 AM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Hershel Fisch wrote:
Hi, all I¹m having a bit of a problem with the decorations on windows when
building as a standalone
The decorations are set to ³title,menu,minimize² or ³menu,minimize² and in
fact it only has
On 5/20/09 9:23 AM, Mark Schonewille m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com
wrote:
Is there anything special about your stack, which might affect
decorations? Perhaps you have the style set the modal? (Actually, I
just tested it and if you set the stack style to modal, the menu title
Hershel Fisch wrote:
Hi, the way my stack is set up, the MainStack which is the splash screen
which has no title bar at all, all scripts are placed in that stack and then
about 35 subStacks.
What command do you use to open a substack?
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay |
Hi, all I¹m having a bit of a problem with the decorations on windows when
building as a standalone
The decorations are set to ³title,menu,minimize² or ³menu,minimize² and in
fact it only has the close box and its disabled.
All help would strongly appreciated.
Thanks in advanced, Hershel
Thanks Devin...
~
The labels in the property inspector can either be descriptive labels
or the property names. This is set in Preferences, in the General
section. There you can set the property labels in the inspector.
Regards,
Devin
On the stack properties: Basic Properties window my machine refers to Controls
and a colleagues machine refers to Decorations. Both are MacBooks running OS X
and both are running Rev Studio2 v2.8.1 Build 472. Weird..
So my question is, do you have Decorations or Controls ??
best, Bob
Bob,
On Sep 28, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Bob Earp wrote:
On the stack properties: Basic Properties window my machine refers
to Controls and a colleagues machine refers to Decorations. Both
are MacBooks running OS X and both are running Rev Studio2 v2.8.1
Build 472. Weird..
So my
Just found another oddity with two machines running proportedly the same
version of Rev. On one machine (the one that shows Decorations instead of
Controls) keyword dateItems does not appear in the documentation and does not
work. On the other machine it does. Go figure
If anybody
extract data from your HyperCard stacks with DIFfersifier.
http://differsifier.economy-x-talk.com
Op 28-sep-2007, om 20:03 heeft Bob Earp het volgende geschreven:
On the stack properties: Basic Properties window my machine refers
to Controls and a colleagues machine refers to Decorations. Both
Hi all,
I have wrote an enhancement request in the Revolution Bugzilla database.
And I think that this enhancement can be great,
so please vote for it. Regards.
Content of the enhancement request :
---
Currently, stacks with decorations set to empty
Am I the only one who ever wanted a window to have no top decorations
at all, but still wanted the user to be able to resize the window?
On Feb 22, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
On OS X it's common to have live resizing, but in Rev there is a
bug in which the liveResizing
I made my own live resizing with no decorations but it is not 100%
perfect. Still worth a look. You may want to control how far they can
resize and put a stop in there. Also I based it on left/right
movement of the mouse but it might be better if is was more
independent and was based upon
I set decorations for stack to empty, but resize is still checked,
the resize control in the lower right corner of the window is gone...
is this normal behavior?
I would like to eliminate title bar and all the top buttons, but keep
the resize option.
Sivakatirswami
On 2/23/06, Sivakatirswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I set decorations for stack to empty, but resize is still checked,
the resize control in the lower right corner of the window is gone...
is this normal behavior?
I don't know if it is normal, but in Rev it is a fact (at least it was
in 2.6, I
I don't know if it is normal, but in Rev it is a fact (at
least it was in 2.6, I haven't tried 2.7). The get a resizble
window in Windows, you have to set the decorations to default.
It's a standard and the way it should be on all OS's and is
documented in the User Interface Guidelines
Scott Kane wrote:
I don't know if it is normal, but in Rev it is a fact (at
least it was in 2.6, I haven't tried 2.7). The get a resizble
window in Windows, you have to set the decorations to default.
It's a standard and the way it should be on all OS's and is
documented in the User Interface
shapes (=
decorations empty), but I don't want users to not NOT see what they
expect at the top of the windows for closing and minimizing the window.
Cheers,
Lars
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com
and Windows. I have a project where all stacks have custom
shapes (= decorations empty), but I don't want users to not NOT see
what they expect at the top of the windows for closing and
minimizing the window.
Look at the iconic property in the dictionary. That should do what
you want.
set iconic
I tried both of the suggestions I received about how to overcome this
issue. Unfortunately both of them didn't work.
So it tried a few different situations to see what would happen.
1. During preOpenStack, the systemWindow property is set to true. The
decorations are not set
The systemWindow works fine, but as soon as you get rid of all
decorations, it no longer stays a systemWindow (Even though the
decoration says System).
Is this a bug, or is there way way to remove the window's border but
keep the window a systemWindow?
Derek Bump
Dreamscape Software
Recently, Derek Bump wrote:
The systemWindow works fine, but as soon as you get rid of all
decorations, it no longer stays a systemWindow (Even though the
decoration says System).
Is this a bug, or is there way way to remove the window's border but
keep the window a systemWindow?
You
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:37:05 -0600, Derek Bump
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The systemWindow works fine, but as soon as you get rid of all
decorations, it no longer stays a systemWindow (Even though the
decoration says System).
Is this a bug, or is there way way to remove the window's border
Hi all,
has someone successfully used this combination for a stack?
Metal, palette AND empty decorations...
No hint in the docs that this is NOT possible...
I have no success so far, when i try it, ALL objects on the card
disappear, but are still present but NO metal look...???
The object do
won't work. metal is technically a decoration. setting the metal of a stack sets this
decoration for you. you can try setting the decorations to empty and then setting the
metal of the stack to true.
best,
Tuviah
Get your name
Hi Tuviah,
won't work. metal is technically a decoration. setting the metal of a
stack sets this decoration
for you. you can try setting the decorations to empty and then setting
the metal of the stack to true.
Tried that, but then the whole card turns white, means all objects
disappear
] wrote:
won't work. metal is technically a decoration. setting the metal of a
stack sets this decoration for you. you can try setting the
decorations to empty and then setting the metal of the stack to true.
best,
Tuviah
Get your
.
Perhaps Tuviah can comment if this is the correct and expected behavior.
It's weirder than that: Ken and I were doing some experimenting not
long ago and found that doing nearly anything to the decorations of
windows other than setting them to default will cause the stack to be
unable
If you do:
set the rect of this stack to tRect
set the decorations of this stack to default
- no resizeStack message will be sent. Solution is to send one
yourself:
send resizeStack to this card
R.
--
Rodney Tamblyn
44 Melville Street
Dunedin
New Zealand
+64 3 4778606
http
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
rodney tamblyn
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 5:52 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: bug - setting decorations stops resizestack message
If you do:
set the rect of this stack to tRect
set the decorations of this stack
on windows-based machines i wrote a dll that allows for top-level windows..
Sean | http://shaosean.tk/
-Original Message-
decorations system,empty is invalid though.
Did you find solution for this that works on a systemWindow? (Jacqueline's
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 01:08 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Did you find solution for this that works on a systemWindow?
(Jacqueline's
solution only works for std palette windows.)
No it seems not possible.
BTW Jaqueline, thanks for the suggestion: a palette window will work
for me. I
I am using the system decoration for a splash screen stack. Seems
like a good way to keep the splash screen in front of other stacks that
that are subsequently opened during startup.
decorations system,empty is invalid though.
I'm really using the system decoration for it's window Z-ordering
On 8/31/03 6:13 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
I'm really using the system decoration for it's window Z-ordering, not
for the window decorations. How can I get a float-on-top window with no
decorations? Just curious if it's possible.
set the raisepalettes to true
set the decorations of stack floater
I'm using vers 2.1 on XP
I try:
set the decorations of this stack to utility
from the msg
and it appears to execute:
set the decorations of this stack to empty
The utility setting should create a palette which floats above all other
windows. I've created a standalone with it and it still
Hi Chipp,
I'm using vers 2.1 on XP
I try:
set the decorations of this stack to utility
the official syntax is:
...
set the decorations of this stack to (utility)
...
But it only worked on OSX for me.
On my win2000 i got:
can't set this property!
...waiting for the beta 3 ;-)
from the msg
Running my standalones under windows OS, I find empirically that stack
windows are only resizable (as in dragging the resize corner with the mouse
pointer) if the decorations are set to default.
I looked in the docs (under resizable property, style property, decorations
property) for confirmation
49 matches
Mail list logo