Message: 4
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:49:15 -0700
From: Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Drawing speed in rev 2.8
To: How to use Revolution
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Recently, James Hurley wrote:
I
Recently, James Hurley wrote:
> I've just moved over to 2.8 and have found a significant loss of
> speed in drawing with the pencil tool.
>
> Does anyone have any idea why the handler below would take 88 ticks
> in 2.7, but 302 ticks in 2.8?
I see the same speed you describe in 2.8.1. Not sur
I've just moved over to 2.8 and have found a significant loss of
speed in drawing with the pencil tool.
Does anyone have any idea why the handler below would take 88 ticks
in 2.7, but 302 ticks in 2.8?
(I realize their are many other ways to draw a circle.)
Jim Hurley
on mouseUp
put
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Drawing speed
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Jim Hurley wrote:
>
> > > > There appears to be no remedy in the offing to the speed problem.
>
> Scott Rainey wrote:
>
>
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 06:22 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
> I concede the difficulties in speedily running color vs. black and
> white, and the improvement in the current release is much appreciated.
> However there remains a considerable gap between MC/RR and HC. For
> example, the follo
Glen Yates wrote:
>
>Interesting little speed test, I get 102 ticks in MC on a 933MHz Pentium 3,
>and 161 ticks on a 400MHz B&W G3 (with Retrospect running in the
>background).
>
>Try running in thousands of colors instead of millions, and you should see a
>good speed increase from your 265 ticks
Interesting little speed test, I get 102 ticks in MC on a 933MHz Pentium 3,
and 161 ticks on a 400MHz B&W G3 (with Retrospect running in the
background).
Try running in thousands of colors instead of millions, and you should see a
good speed increase from your 265 ticks.
-Glen Yates
Jim Hurley
Jim Hurley wrote:
> > > There appears to be no remedy in the offing to the speed problem.
Scott Rainey wrote:
>Actually the current release is pretty close to HC in performance,
>the primary remaining difference being due to running in color vs
>black and white (anywhere from 8 to 32 times as
