longer to display at the beginning but will offer smooth
scrolling when the user interacts with the data grid.
So that's why when you turn the cache control to on, you are able to
use the find command in it. That is the only way to have the native
find command performs.
A possible workaround
5 works as expected.
line 3 returns Not Found
Why?
Line 2 above will put a return character (numToChar(10) at the end
of wordToFind (except when clicking the last line). The find string
method doesn't allow return characters. Also, the find command
searches forwards from the previous find
Dave was right, line 2 had a return in it. line 5 did not.
I discovered this 20 minutes after I went to bed, got up and lo and
behold
it now works.
Another difference between HC and RM.
Many thanks.
Bob
Begin forwarded message:
Friends, I have recently upgraded from HyperCard to
RG Teeter wrote:
I am recreating some hypercard stacks.
I am having a problem with find
The handler below:
on mouseUp
1 select the clickline
2 put the selectedtext into wordToFind
3 find string wordToFind in field TestFld2
4 put wordToFind the result
5 find string
Friends, I have recently upgraded from HyperCard to Revolution Media.
I am recreating some hypercard stacks.
I am having a problem with find
The handler below:
on mouseUp
1 select the clickline
2 put the selectedtext into wordToFind
3 find string wordToFind in field TestFld2
4
Hi Paul and Jeanne
Is the don't search property set to true for this field?
--No, it isn't set to true.
Is it a sharedText set to true?
--No, it isn't set to true, either.
Paul Looney
Have you previously used the find command on the same card, finding
the same thing?
--Yes, I did so
: problems with find command
At 12:55 PM +0200 4/14/2006, Martin Meili wrote:
I'm having problems with the find command.
I've got a a text field with a lot of names. Each name is on a
single line and the data is clean, so, no spaces, no tabs and so onŠŠ
Using the find command the result
I'm having problems with the find command.
I've got a a text field with a lot of names. Each name is on a single
line and the data is clean, so, no spaces, no tabs and so on……
Using the find command the result is not found (!!), even though you
can see in the text field that the result should
Hi,
Yes, there are numerous problems with the Find Command. Do you mean
the Global Find or the one in the Script Editor?
You could try fiddling with the settings in the prefs, failing that,
if you want to be 100% sure of finding everything you are looking for
then the best bet
At 12:55 PM +0200 4/14/2006, Martin Meili wrote:
I'm having problems with the find command.
I've got a a text field with a lot of names. Each name is on a
single line and the data is clean, so, no spaces, no tabs and so on
Using the find command the result is not found (!!), even though
you
, as fast as the
find in the message box. Now that I have stopped outsmarting myself
regarding the find command, I think I can bypass the message box.
You inspired me!
Cheers,
Tim
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Hi Ken,
On 8/8/05 7:14 PM, Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
1--If I use the find command in the single-line message box, is
there any way to get the foundchunk? How?
get the foundChunk
:-)
Well, thanks, you did try to help, and sent a smiley too.
I knew that. Typing put
On 8/9/05 1:56 PM, Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ken,
On 8/8/05 7:14 PM, Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
1--If I use the find command in the single-line message box, is
there any way to get the foundchunk? How?
get the foundChunk
:-)
Well, thanks
use the find command in the single-line message box, is
there any way to get the foundchunk? How?
get the foundChunk
:-)
Well, thanks, you did try to help, and sent a smiley too.
I knew that. Typing put the foundchunk into the single-line message
box would be nearly pointless, except
Timothy Miller wrote:
It still seems like I am the only amateur do-it-yourself end user on
the list. It's easy to be defensive, in that position, though that's
no excuse. I also admit I'm prone to absent minded scripting errors. I
still wonder if Dreamcard is intended for people like me,
Regarding the single-line message box command, I was trying to
enhance the find script that Sarah generously posted for my
benefit. It uses the single-line message box.
Tim,
You can easily change my script to se the multi-line message box
instead.
Cheers,
Sarah
Hi,
1--If I use the find command in the single-line message box, is
there any way to get the foundchunk? How?
2--If I use the find command in a script, is there any way to script
the equivalent of hitting the return key (like when I click on a
button), so as to find the next item, as I
On 8/8/05 7:14 PM, Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
1--If I use the find command in the single-line message box, is
there any way to get the foundchunk? How?
get the foundChunk
:-)
You can also get the foundText, foundField, foundLine, and foundLoc.
2--If I use the find
David,
The find command begins searching from the point of the last
successful find. Try inserting Find Empty just above the line of
code with the find command:
Find Empty
Find desired text
...
Mark Greenberg
___
use-revolution mailing list
.
In this case, putting the fld reference there is actually better.
David,
The find command begins searching from the point of the last
successful find. Try inserting Find Empty just above the line of
code with the find command:
Find Empty
Find desired text
...
Mark Greenberg
Further to my last post, the find works when the field is specified,
but that wasn't necessary for other fields.
Dave
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
21 matches
Mail list logo
