- do you really think that the current Rev / MC IDEs allow us to
maintain &
debug scripts with hundreds or thousands of lines ? Of course not...
But
Salut, JB,
And my I say that I agree wholehearted with every word you
wrote...until you ended with the statements I included above:
1. The stack
The strongest argument for the legitimacy of Transcript is an army of
well-marketed world-class apps made with it.
...with the Made With Run Rev logo in every About box.:{`)
--
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.net/who.htm
"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow t
- do you really think that the current Rev / MC IDEs allow us to
maintain &
debug scripts with hundreds or thousands of lines ? Of course not... But
CodeWarrior (for instance) does...
So in conclusion, I'm tempted to say that the language itself doesn't
look
amateurish at all (and DOESN'T need to
jbv wrote:
> The main point I want to make is that this discussion about introducing
> C-like syntax in x-Talk is totally pointless, especially if the only
> goal is to make Transcript look less amateurish...
Amen. The strongest argument for the legitimacy of Transcript is an army of
well-market
>
> >> because we have a
> >> language that thinks like we do, not like the compiler does."
>
Well, even if I somehow agree with the above sentence (because I more
or less understand what it implies), I must confess I don't really like
it...
IMHO computers and languages DO NOT THINK. Only progra
