At 7:53 PM -0500 3/16/05, Kevin J wrote:
Is there a document or a website that can explain some of the key
words a bit better. When to know when you need the key words "the",
"is" ect.
ie:
if the somthing of the otherthing = "true" then
The the keyword is mandatory before the names of built-in f
Kevin,
> THe other problem I still have
>is that the descriptions in the docs don't show enough examples of the
>different ways a script can be written.
That's not true... If you browse the docs, you'll find examples for
everything
and every use...
But the basics of
Kevin,
That is what I always had problems with at first. I learned from
reading other peoples scripts to see how live examples where done. I
downloaded hundreds of sample stacks from the great people on this list
and open them for how this stuff works. THe other problem I still have
is that the
Is there a document or a website that can explain some of the key
words a bit better. When to know when you need the key words "the",
"is" ect.
ie:
if the somthing of the otherthing = "true" then
That is what I am mostly having problems with.
Thanks
Kevin
_
At 18:44 14/07/2004 -0700, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
At 4:31 PM +0100 7/13/04, Alex Tweedly wrote:
Do all the Transcript keywords operate at the same precedence ?
You're right.
For precedence rules, take a look at the Operator Precedence Reference.
Thanks Jeanne - but I'm afraid I st
and it tries to load it. After that is loaded it tries to add the
myFile string to the field. If you combine "file:" with myFile before
calling the put URL command then all works as expected.
Example:
put "file:" & myFile into zipZap
put URL zipZap into field "tes
On Dec 5, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Ken Norris wrote:
Howdy,
Just a casual question (see subj).
~1690
(counting operators, keywords, builtin+library commands, functions)
Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software |
Alas, I am reaching that time of life when memory space is limited
on 12/5/03 3:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:11:22 -0700
> From: Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: How many keywords in Rev 2.1?
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Ken Norris wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>&g
On Dec 5, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Ken Norris wrote:
Howdy,
Just a casual question (see subj).
~1690
(counting operators, keywords, builtin+library commands, functions)
Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software |
<http://mindlube.com>
what a waste of thumbs that are oppos
Howdy,
Just a casual question (see subj).
Ken N.
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
10 matches
Mail list logo