Seems the localizer will be jut a localizer then... Thanks Mark.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Wieder > Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 00:09 > To: How to use Revolution > Subject: Re: Localizer - Transcriptlator - opinion request > > > MisterX- > > Friday, August 6, 2004, 10:44:02 PM, you wrote: > > M> The last piece I added to this stack is a parser that finds > M> all your local assignments and puts them into the script if > M> missing. This script also recognizes also the locals assigned > > We're obviously thinking along the same lines here. I've just been > finishing off and getting ready to publish my Stack Analyzer that has > this as one of its tasks (also namespace conflicts, unquoted string > literals, etc). > > M> So the question is whether this last script should be made > M> available separately in a stack from the other translators? > > My feeling is that this is a separate feature from cross-language > translation. They're obviously related issues, but there are some > things that are rev-specific, or are at least frowned on in other > languages, and that therefore seem to be out of the realm of > translation itself. I'm in particular thinking of the strong typing > present in C and java, and to a lesser extent in basic. > > BTW - if you start a new thread with a real subject line instead of > replying to the middle of an existing one there's more of a chance it > will be seen. I missed your original message the first time through > because it was buried in a thread that I was ignoring. > > -- > -Mark Wieder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
