On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:16 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
The default value for maxWidth and maxHeight is the topmost limit of the
allowable stack size. So if you click the up arrow, you're going to go off
into the weeds; the size will be an abstraction. The fix would be to script
the inspector
Michael D Mays wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:16 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
The default value for maxWidth and maxHeight is the topmost limit
of the allowable stack size. So if you click the up arrow, you're
going to go off into the weeds; the size will be an abstraction.
The fix would be to
If a field isn't recognizing the closefield message I would call that a major
bug, if the closefield message isn't being trapped and/or acted upon correctly
in a field I would call that minor. (yes I am nit picking like my cousins ;)
Re reproduction: If I create a new stack, double click the
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:57:09 PM, you wrote:
groan Reproduct is a perfectly good word, it just isn't in
widespread use yet. Knowing you, it soon will be...
I think reproduct is a great verb. And the concept is certainly in
common use:
it's what makers of candy bars and cereal boxes
Michael D Mays wrote:
If a field isn't recognizing the closefield message I would call that
a major bug, if the closefield message isn't being trapped and/or
acted upon correctly in a field I would call that minor. (yes I am
nit picking like my cousins ;)
It looks to me like it just isn't
When I type in a new location and tab out of the field in the size position
inspector for a stack nothing happens. All other objects I've done this with
update their location when I tab out.
Is this a feature or a bug?
If it is a feature, why?
Thanks,
Works for me. Something is going on at your end.
If you click and hold on the small arrows, does the stack size change,
tracking the increase or decrease in the values?
Craig Newman
In a message dated 6/28/10 11:07:50 AM, mich...@michaelsmanias.com writes:
When I type in a new location and
Yes this works.
On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:16 AM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
Works for me. Something is going on at your end.
If you click and hold on the small arrows, does the stack size change,
tracking the increase or decrease in the values?
___
So the size tracks the changes when clicking on the arrows, but NOT when
you enter a value and leave the field?
Craig Newman
In a message dated 6/28/10 11:24:39 AM, mich...@michaelsmanias.com writes:
Yes this works.
___
use-revolution mailing
When I go to one of the location fields, type in a different number; tab:
nothing happens. If I click either of the arrows for the location's input
fields of the stack, the stack updates to the incremented value. I've quit and
restarted Rev; created a new empty mainstack with the same results.
Michael D Mays wrote:
When I go to one of the location fields, type in a different number;
tab: nothing happens. If I click either of the arrows for the
location's input fields of the stack, the stack updates to the
incremented value. I've quit and restarted Rev; created a new empty
mainstack
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I wish I had been waiting around for someone to coin that word...
...but then I would have been precrastinating...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
On 06/28/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I wish I had been waiting around for someone to coin that word...
...but then I would have been precrastinating...
Somebody around here has been
Richmond-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:39:52 PM, you wrote:
On 06/28/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I wish I had been waiting around for someone to coin that word...
...but then I would have
Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I wish I had been waiting around for someone to coin that word...
...but then I would have been precrastinating...
groan Reproduct is a perfectly good word, it just isn't in
widespread
On 06/28/2010 10:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:39:52 PM, you wrote:
On 06/28/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I wish I had been waiting around
On Jun 28, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:39:52 PM, you wrote:
On 06/28/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I wish I had been waiting around for someone to coin
On 06/28/2010 11:10 PM, Peter Brigham MD wrote:
On Jun 28, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:39:52 PM, you wrote:
On 06/28/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
I can't reproduct this one.
I
On Jun 28, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 06/28/2010 11:10 PM, Peter Brigham MD wrote:
On Jun 28, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:39:52 PM, you wrote:
On 06/28/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:25:11 PM,
Peter-
Monday, June 28, 2010, 1:27:38 PM, you wrote:
I think we need to stick to the English linguage. Have we beaten this
dead horse sufficiently yet?
One of my favorite books, unfortunately long out of print (apparently
there's a used copy on Amazon for $330) is fortunately on line. You
20 matches
Mail list logo
