On 27.02.09 at 08:49 -0800 Scott Rossi apparently wrote:
I could be wrong but I believe that the order of library stack to be used is
determined by the order opened: the scripts of the most recent stack opened
would be used before any others. I know this is true of frontscripts.
The workaround
t;
> > Aloha from Hawaii
> > Jim Bufalni
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-
> revolution-
> >> boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Scott Rossi
> >> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 8:21 AM
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 8:21 AM
To: Revolution Mail List
Subject: Re: Main stack and substack order in the message path
Recently, Jim Bufalini wrote:
The workaround might be to have stack A call "start using stack
ABC"
(and
the same with the other stack) to make sure the s
Message-
> From: use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-revolution-
> boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Scott Rossi
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 8:21 AM
> To: Revolution Mail List
> Subject: Re: Main stack and substack order in the message path
>
>
It looks like Start Using inserts the script of the stack into the
front of the message path, meaning it will receive all messages first.
You can just see why that would be a good idea! You want the stack you
last opened to be the one that gets the messages.
You can alternatively use the In
Recently, Jim Bufalini wrote:
>> The workaround might be to have stack A call "start using stack ABC"
>> (and
>> the same with the other stack) to make sure the substack is used first
>> when
>> necessary.
>
> This is done and it is actually the problem.
>
> I actually discovered this in two way
Hi Scott,
> The workaround might be to have stack A call "start using stack ABC"
> (and
> the same with the other stack) to make sure the substack is used first
> when
> necessary.
This is done and it is actually the problem.
I actually discovered this in two ways working on an update for ListM
Jim-
Friday, February 27, 2009, 9:03:41 AM, you wrote:
> I didn't say automatically. Each lib is placed by a start using statement in
Silly me. I assumed you meant that substacks would be used
automatically. On rereading I see it differently.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
__
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: use-revolution-boun...@lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-revolution-
> boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Mark Wieder
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 6:45 AM
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: Main stack and substack order i
Recently, Jim Bufalini wrote:
> Let's say you have main stack A with a substack that is a lib called ABC and
> you start using ABC on launch. You then launch a completely different main
> stack called X with an identical substack lib called XYZ and then start
> using XYZ on launch of main stack X.
Jim-
Friday, February 27, 2009, 8:05:30 AM, you wrote:
> Wouldn't it be logical that the substack of the main stack of the card would
> be searched in the message path before the substack of another completely
In some alternate universe perhaps. But substacks are not
automatically placed into th
Hi All,
I wonder if someone can explain this to me and the way around it.
Let's say you have main stack A with a substack that is a lib called ABC and
you start using ABC on launch. You then launch a completely different main
stack called X with an identical substack lib called XYZ and then start
12 matches
Mail list logo
