Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-25 Thread Dave
Hi, I really can't see how it's not a bug to be honest, I mean, if: put "Hello" into me OR set the text of me to "Hello" doesn't work 100% of the time, then If you write a handler (subroutine) and if it works or not is dependent on where it's called from then it's really not a

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-24 Thread Mark Smith
I think we decided that if it was not a bug, then the docs should discuss it a bit more fully. Bugzilla no. 3419 best, Mark On 24 Nov 2006, at 07:38, Bill Marriott wrote: Hm... maybe not yet. Did y'all decide it was a bug or not? If so, what's the bug ID#? _

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-23 Thread Bill Marriott
Hm... maybe not yet. Did y'all decide it was a bug or not? If so, what's the bug ID#? "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mark Smith wrote: >> Except when it refers to the value or content of the object, eg. 'put me >> into someVariable" (a known and u

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-16 Thread Dave
On 16 Nov 2006, at 11:29, Bernard Devlin wrote: Dave said: >> As far as I know they evaluate the same way in both cases, e.g. when called from another card or are called from the same card. The problem is that when called from another card, the "me" that gets evaluated is the wrong "me". [...]

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-16 Thread Bernard Devlin
Dave said: >> As far as I know they evaluate the same way in both cases, e.g. when called from another card or are called from the same card. The problem is that when called from another card, the "me" that gets evaluated is the wrong "me". [...] My guess would be is that "me" is pre-calculated, s

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-16 Thread Dave
On 16 Nov 2006, at 05:34, Bernard Devlin wrote: >> Have we stretched this thread to the breaking point yet? ;) << Hi Jacque, I think there is an oddity/bug here. For example (unless I've really misunderstood things), when a message is received by a handler in a field on a card that is no

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-15 Thread J. Landman Gay
Bernard Devlin wrote: >> Have we stretched this thread to the breaking point yet? ;) << Hi Jacque, I think there is an oddity/bug here. For example (unless I've really misunderstood things), when a message is received by a handler in a field on a card that is not the current card, "me" reso

Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-15 Thread Bernard Devlin
>> Have we stretched this thread to the breaking point yet? ;) << Hi Jacque, I think there is an oddity/bug here. For example (unless I've really misunderstood things), when a message is received by a handler in a field on a card that is not the current card, "me" resolves to the actual t

Re: Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-15 Thread Mark Smith
Well, I think that we've established that me, er, I... no, me behaves strangely under some circumstances... Best Mark On 16 Nov 2006, at 02:09, J. Landman Gay wrote: Have we stretched this thread to the breaking point yet? ;) ___ use-revolution

Me, me, me [Was: Re: Bug???? Discuss please!]

2006-11-15 Thread J. Landman Gay
Mark Smith wrote: Except when it refers to the value or content of the object, eg. 'put me into someVariable" (a known and useful exception) but also apparently when it doesn't seem to refer usefully to anything - as per this thread... Actually, the example is still an object reference that eq