I've given bug 3419 5 votes.
Best,
Mark
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Dave-
Thursday, November 16, 2006, 4:39:40 PM, you wrote:
>> not voted for it when it was logged as a bug,
> How do you know that?
If you'd have looked at the bug report, you'd have seen that a) there
are no votes assigned to this bug, and b) Marcus noted in June that
it's related to the shared
On 17 Nov 2006, at 00:19, Bernard Devlin wrote:
>>
The thing is that depending on the context "me" is evaluated
differently, so all the different tests etc. don't really count for
much, except that they evaluate ok in *that* context or they don't.
The tests you did are just red herrings since t
>>
The thing is that depending on the context "me" is evaluated
differently, so all the different tests etc. don't really count for
much, except that they evaluate ok in *that* context or they don't.
The tests you did are just red herrings since they change the context
of how "me" is evaluated.
<<
On 16 Nov 2006, at 15:38, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Bernard Devlin wrote:
I decided to look in bugzilla myself, and I found that it was
indeed entered as a bug by the ever-gracious Mr. Gaskin on
23.3.06. Marcus from Runrev accepted that it "is pathological"
and should probably be consid
On 16 Nov 2006, at 12:28, Bernard Devlin wrote:
Dave
I decided to look in bugzilla myself, and I found that it was
indeed entered as a bug by the ever-gracious Mr. Gaskin on
23.3.06. Marcus from Runrev accepted that it "is pathological"
and should probably be considerd a bug (and it i
Bernard Devlin wrote:
I decided to look in bugzilla myself, and I found that it was indeed
entered as a bug by the ever-gracious Mr. Gaskin on 23.3.06. Marcus
from Runrev accepted that it "is pathological" and should probably
be considerd a bug (and it is indeed still open as a bug). Whe
Dave
I decided to look in bugzilla myself, and I found that it was indeed
entered as a bug by the ever-gracious Mr. Gaskin on 23.3.06. Marcus
from Runrev accepted that it "is pathological" and should probably
be considerd a bug (and it is indeed still open as a bug). When I
searched b
