Milgram and the Unabomber [OT]

2010-10-22 Thread David Glasgow
As a forensic psychologist I have an interest in both Milgram's work and the Unabomber. My recollection is that Kaczynski was a volunteer subject at the Murray lab in Harvard, but not for Stan Milgram. They did other poorly controlled 'research' there, which certainly would not obtain ethical ap

Re: Milgram and the Unabomber [OT]

2010-10-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 10/22/10 6:48 AM, David Glasgow wrote: As a forensic psychologist... Uh oh. After reading this list for so long, you've probably got enough material for a book by now. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperact

Re: Milgram and the Unabomber [OT]

2010-10-22 Thread Marian Petrides
Yeah, but no one would believe him, even if he wrote a book. On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:57 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 10/22/10 6:48 AM, David Glasgow wrote: >> As a forensic psychologist... > > Uh oh. After reading this list for so long, you've probably got enough > material for a book by now. >

Re: Milgram and the Unabomber [OT]

2010-10-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 10/22/10 4:02 PM, Marian Petrides wrote: Yeah, but no one would believe him, even if he wrote a book. On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:57 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 10/22/10 6:48 AM, David Glasgow wrote: As a forensic psychologist... Uh oh. After reading this list for so long, you've probably got

Re: Milgram and the Unabomber [OT]

2010-10-22 Thread Marian Petrides
In case anyone misinterpreted my earlier reply let me offer the following clarification: By that I mean we all are so, ahem, "unique" that our story would not be believable, NOT that no one would believe David. On Oct 22, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Marian Petrides wrote: > Yeah, but no one would believ