On Sep 15, 2004, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Trevor DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: printRotated on Mac?
To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
...
The entry even has a link to
>
>
> I know it's a little off-topic, but every time I see a request like
> this I am reminded of how many feature requests would be unnecessary if
> RunRev supported a way to call the native OS toolboxes.
>
> I can even imagine a nice little business building cross-platform
> functions to extend R
On Sep 15, 2004, at 5:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: jbv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Native OS Support [was Re: printRotated on Mac?]
To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-
I know it's a little off-topic, but every time I see a request like
this I am reminded of how many feature requests would be unnecessary if
RunRev supported a way to call the native OS toolboxes.
[snip]
Quite a few, in my estimation. I have suggested several times that
support for a compiler sym
In my opinion, a native Transcript solution would be MUCH preferable
to reliance on externals.
I should note that my opinion appears to be in the minority:
On March 27th I invited others who were interested to join me in a
private effort to flesh out the concept, create a basic design, and
Bugzi
