Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-05 Thread Dom
Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on newcard answer Only one card, please! send delete this card to this STACK in 1 sec ## stack !!! end newcard That works here for me ;-) No luck for me... The same bug arises! OS 10.2.4 iceBook 800 Rev 2.1 --

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-05 Thread Dom
Pierre Sahores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just because your answer brakes the original message path, you just need to invert your two statments as below to get the expected result : Tu as tout bon, Pierre :-))) You are all right, Pierre :-))) -- mais je ne sais pas si c'est une histoire de

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-05 Thread Pierre Sahores
Le dim 05/10/2003 11:19, Dom a crit : OS 10.2.4 iceBook 800 Rev 2.1 Run an icebook 800, here too. Good mothercard, lots more faster than my previous icebook 600 and even than the G4 12 inches, i was going to brought before my resseller said me i would do a best operation in taking the

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-05 Thread Dom
Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C'est: Never touch a running system! ;-) I thought to a more argotic one, such as If ain't broke, don't touch it ? -- ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-05 Thread Pierre Sahores
Le dim 05/10/2003 19:35, Dom a crit : Pierre Sahores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't you upgrade to 10.2.6 ? Quand a marche, ne touche rien ;- (c'est comment en anglais ?) (I know there is an expression in english but can't remember) With each upgrade the battery problem arises

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-05 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Dom, Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C'est: Never touch a running system! ;-) I thought to a more argotic one, such as If ain't broke, don't touch it ? Sorry, looks like i'm too computer-centric ;-) Ciao ragazzo... Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.major-k.de

Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-04 Thread Dom
I have a single card stack. I don't want the user adds a new card; so I trap the newcard message (accordingly with the help) If I write: on newcard send delete this card to this card in 1 sec end newcard That works... But if I add a warning, such as in: on newcard answer Only one card,

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-04 Thread Klaus Major
Bon soir Domi, ... on newcard answer Only one card, please! send delete this card to this STACK in 1 sec ## stack !!! end newcard That works here for me ;-) Hope that helps... Au revoir Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.major-k.de ___

Re: Newcard: a curious bug!?

2003-10-04 Thread Pierre Sahores
Hi Dom, It's not a bug... Just because your answer brakes the original message path, you just need to invert your two statments as below to get the expected result : Bests, Pierre on newcard send delete this card to this card -- in 1 sec answer Only one card, please! end newcard Le